Journals / Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 4

Transcatheter Closure of Atrial Septal Defect in Children: Single-Center Experience, Mid-Term Follow-up Results

Pages
406–412
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The procedure complication rates differed according to device type.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Atrial septal defect is a congenital heart disease usually diagnosed in childhood.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This study evaluated 232 patient files retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The procedure complication rates differed according to device type.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Atrial septal defect is a congenital heart disease usually diagnosed in childhood. This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term follow-up results of patients who underwent transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect by comparing the devices and methods used in the procedure and investigating the complications of this procedure in children. Materials and Methods: This study evaluated 232 patient files retrospectively. Of the 232 patients, 24 were excluded from the study due to missing files or data. Also, patients with multi-fenestrated atrial septal defect and aneurismatic septal tissue were excluded from the study. The following data were evaluated: follow-up time, patient complaints, symptoms, transthoracic echocardiography, and transesophageal echocardiography findings (if performed), the size of the defect as measured by balloon-sizing, the size of the device used in the procedure, and major and minor complications. Results: The study included 208 children who were diagnosed with atrial septal defect. The mean age of the patients was 88.0 ± 56.5 months. Of the patients, 170 (81.7%) had no complaints. The success rate of the procedure was found to be 95.7%. While device embolization was the most common major complication, arrhythmia was the most common minor complication. The complication rate was statistically different according to the device type used in the procedure. Conclusion: Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect is a safe method for atrial septal defect closure in pediatric patients. The study found that defect diameters measured by different methods were not correlated with each other. The procedure complication rates differed according to device type.

🔖

Cite This Article

OZBAY, Y. S., ÖMEROĞLU, R. E., DİNDAR, A., AYDOĞAN, Ü., NİŞLİ, K. (2022). Transcatheter Closure of Atrial Septal Defect in Children: Single-Center Experience, Mid-Term Follow-up Results. Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online), Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 4, 406–412. https://ajindex.com/articles/418304

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hoffman JIE, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002
  2. 39(12):1890-1900. [CrossRef] 2. Van der Linde D, Konings EEM, Slager MA, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011
  3. 58(21):2241-2247. [CrossRef] 3. Botto LD, Correa A, Erickson JD. Racial and temporal variations in the prevalence of heart defects. Pediatrics. 2001
  4. 107(3):E32. [CrossRef] 4. Karamlou T, Diggs BS, Ungerleider RM, McCrindle BW, Welke KF. The rush to atrial septal defect closure: is the introduction of percutaneous closure driving utilization? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008
  5. 86(5):1584-1591. [CrossRef] 5. King TD, Mills NL. Nonoperative closure of atrial septal defects. Surgery. 1974
  6. 75(3):383-388. 6. Siddiqui WT, Usman T, Atiq M, Amanullah MM. Transcatheter versus surgical closure of atrial septum defect: a debate from a developing country. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2014
  7. 6(4):205-210. [CrossRef] 7. Ooi YK, Kelleman M, Ehrlich A, et al. Transcatheter Versus surgical closure of atrial septal defects in children: a value comparison. JACC Cardiovasc Intv. 2016
  8. 9(1):79-86. [CrossRef] 8. Anderson RH. Moss and Adams–heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents including the fetus and young adult. In: Emmanouilides GC, Riemenschneider TA, Allen HD, Gutgesell HP, eds. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins
  9. Geva T, Martins JD, Wald RM. Atrial septal defects. Lancet. 2014
  10. 383(9932):1921-1932. [CrossRef] 10. Behjati-Ardakani M, Golshan M, Akhavan-Karbasi S, Hosseini SM, Behjati-Ardakani MA, Sarebanhassanabadi M. The clinical course of patients with atrial septal defects. Iran J Pediatr. 2016
  11. 26(4):e4649. [CrossRef] 11. Fraisse A, Latchman M, Sharma SR, et al. Atrial septal defect closure: indications and contra-indications. J Thorac Dis. 2018
  12. 10(Suppl 24):S2874-S2881. [CrossRef] 12. Rigatelli G, Nghia NT, Zuin M, Conte L, D'Elia K, Nanjundappa A. Very long-term outcomes of transcatheter secundum atrial septal defect closure using intracardiac echocardiography without balloon sizing. Clin Radiol. 2019
  13. 74(9):732.e17-732.e22. [CrossRef] 13. Amedro P, Bayburt S, Assaidi A, et al. Should transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects with inferior-posterior deficient rim still be attempted? J Thorac Dis. 2019
  14. 11(3):708-716. [CrossRef] 14. Bergersen L, Gauvreau K, Foerster SR, et al. Catheterization for congenital heart disease adjustment for risk method (CHARM). JACC Cardiovasc Inte