Journals / Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Juvenile and Adolescent Sexual Abuse Victims: A Retrospective Study

Pages
68–74
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Considering that many child abuse victims have normal examination findings, it should not be forgotten that the interview and psychiatric examination with the child are as valuable as the genital examination.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the sociodemographic characteristics and the mental, anogenital, and physical examination findings of child and adolescent sexual abuse victims and to discuss them in the light of the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This study included a total of 134 children and adolescent cases between the ages of 0 and 18 who were victims of sexual abuse, from among the reports prepared in the Forensic Medicine Clinic of Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal Training and Research Hospital between 2015 and 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Considering that many child abuse victims have normal examination findings, it should not be forgotten that the interview and psychiatric examination with the child are as valuable as the genital examination.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the sociodemographic characteristics and the mental, anogenital, and physical examination findings of child and adolescent sexual abuse victims and to discuss them in the light of the literature. Materials and Methods: This study included a total of 134 children and adolescent cases between the ages of 0 and 18 who were victims of sexual abuse, from among the reports prepared in the Forensic Medicine Clinic of Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal Training and Research Hospital between 2015 and 2019. Results: This study included 134 cases: 113 (84.3%) were female and 21 (15.7%) were male. The mean age was 13 ± 3.4 years (min: 3, max: 17). The average age of the defendants was 25.6 ± 13 years (min: 12, max: 75), and all the defendants were male. The defendants were strangers in 60 cases (4.8%). Sexual abuse mostly occurred as vaginal penetration in 46 cases (34.3%). Sixty–nine (51.5%) cases were exposed to abuse more than once. Depression due to sexual abuse developed in 14 (10.4%) of the cases. Conclusion: Considering that many child abuse victims have normal examination findings, it should not be forgotten that the interview and psychiatric examination with the child are as valuable as the genital examination.

🔖

Cite This Article

HÖSÜKLER, E., YİLMAZ, A., ERKOL, Z. (2022). Evaluation of Juvenile and Adolescent Sexual Abuse Victims: A Retrospective Study. Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online), Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1, 68–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/418299

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Adams JA, Kaplan RA, Starling SP, et al. Guidelines for medical care of children who may have been sexually abused. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2007
  2. 20(3):163-172. [CrossRef] 2. Murray LK, Nguyen A, Cohen JA. Child sexual abuse. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2014
  3. 23(2):321-337. [CrossRef] 3. Kotzé JM, Brits H. Child sexual abuse: the significance of the history and testifying on non-confirmatory findings. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2019
  4. 11(1):e1-e7. [CrossRef] 4. EnyedyA, Tsikouras P, Csorba R. Medical and legal aspects of child sexual abuse: a population-based study in a Hungarian County. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018
  5. 15(4):701. [CrossRef] 5. Choudhry V, Dayal R, Pillai D, Kalokhe AS, Beier K, Patel V. Child sexual abuse in India: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018
  6. 13(10):e0205086. [CrossRef] 6. Pereda N, Guilera G, Forns M, Gómez-Benito J. The prevalence of child sexual abuse in community and student samples: a metaanalysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009
  7. 29(4):328-338. [CrossRef] 7. Priebe G, Svedin CG. Child sexual abuse is largely hidden from the adult society. An epidemiological study of adolescents’ disclosures. Child Abuse Negl. 2008
  8. 32(12):1095-1108. [CrossRef] 8. Giroux ME, Chong K, Coburn PI, Connolly DA. Differences in child sexual abuse cases involving child versus adolescent complainants. Child Abuse Negl. 2018
  9. [CrossRef] 9. AlMadani O, Bamousa M, Alsaif D, Kharoshah MAA, Alsowayigh K. Child physical and sexual abuse in Dammam, Saudi Arabia: a descriptive case-series analysis study. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2012
  10. 2(1):33-37. [CrossRef] 10. Davies EA, Jones AC. Risk factors in child sexual abuse. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013
  11. 20(3):146-150. [CrossRef] 11. Modelli MES, Galvão MF, Pratesi R. Child sexual abuse. Forensic Sci Int. 2012
  12. 217(1-3):1-4. [CrossRef] 12. Essabar L, Khalqallah A, Dakhama BS. Child sexual abuse: report of 311 cases with review of literature. Pan Afr Med J. 2015
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Silva WDS, Ribeiro FM, Guimarães GK, Santos MSD, Almeida VPDS, Barroso-Junior UO. Factors associated with child sexual abuse confirmation at forensic examinations. Cien Saude Colet. 2018
  14. 23(2):599-606. [CrossRef] 14. Bahali K, Akçan R, Tahiroglu AY, Avci A. Child sexual abuse: seven years in practice. J Forensic Sci. 2010
  15. 55(3):633-636. [CrossRef] 15. Butun C, Yildirim A, Ozer E, Yilmaz E, Sari SA. A nonrandom sample of 55 sexual abuse cases in Sivas. Med Sci Monit. 2017
  16. [CrossRef] 16. Küçüker H. Analysis of 268 c