Journals / Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Suspected Macrolide Allergies in Children

Pages
81–86
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cross-reactivity, albeit rare, can occur between clarithromycin and azithromycin, which are the most frequently used macrolides in children.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Macrolides are often accepted as safe antibiotics due to their low allergenicity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to evaluate the clinical manifestations, confirmation rate, and frequency of cross-reactivity in children admitted with suspicious clarithromycin or azithromycin allergy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cross-reactivity, albeit rare, can occur between clarithromycin and azithromycin, which are the most frequently used macrolides in children.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Macrolides are often accepted as safe antibiotics due to their low allergenicity. However, studies on macrolides, particularly studies evaluating cross-reactivity in macrolides, are highly rare in children. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical manifestations, confirmation rate, and frequency of cross-reactivity in children admitted with suspicious clarithromycin or azithromycin allergy. Materials and Methods: A total of 61 children suspected of macrolide antibiotic allergy (clarithromycin, n = 39 and azithromycin, n = 22) were evaluated. Allergy work-up including drug provocation tests were performed in all patients to confirm drug allergy. Results: Macrolide allergy was confirmed in 9.8% (n = 6) of patients (azithromycin, 18.2% [n = 4] and clarithromycin, 5.1% [n = 2]). There was no significant difference between the confirmation rate of clarithromycin and azithromycin (P = .117). Cross-reaction with clarithromycin was confirmed in 2 (33.3%) patients with azithromycin allergy. Conclusion: Drug skin tests are not capable of confirming or ruling out macrolide allergy, and oral provocation tests are essential for a definitive diagnosis. Cross-reactivity, albeit rare, can occur between clarithromycin and azithromycin, which are the most frequently used macrolides in children.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜLEYMAN, A., YÜCEL, E., TAMAY, Z. Ü., GÜLER, N. (2022). Evaluation of Suspected Macrolide Allergies in Children. Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online), Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1, 81–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/418289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Araújo L, Demoly P. Macrolides allergy. Curr Pharm Des. 2008
  2. 14(27):2840-2862. [CrossRef] 2. Guvenir H, Dibek Misirlioglu E, Capanoglu M, Vezir E, Toyran M, Kocabas CN. Proven non-β-lactam antibiotic allergy in children. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2016
  3. 169(1):45-50. [CrossRef] 3. Barni S, Butti D, Mori F, et al. Azithromycin is more allergenic than clarithromycin in children with suspected hypersensitivity reaction to macrolides. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2015
  4. 25(2):128-132. 4. Shaeer KM, Chahine EB, Varghese Gupta S, Cho JC. Macrolide allergic reactions. Pharmacy. 2019
  5. 7(3):135. [CrossRef] 5. Demoly P, Adkinson NF, Brockow K, et al. International consensus on drug allergy. Allergy. 2014
  6. 69(4):420-437. [CrossRef] 6. Chia FL, Thong BY. Macrolide allergy: which tests are really useful? Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2011
  7. 39(4):191-192. [CrossRef] 7. Solensky R, Khan DA. Evaluation of antibiotic allergy: the role of skin tests and drug challenges. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014
  8. 14(9):459. [CrossRef] 8. Kuyucu S, Mori F, Atanaskovic-Markovic M, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to non-betalactam antibiotics in children: an extensive review. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2014
  9. 25(6):534-543. [CrossRef] 9. Kruppa A, Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Krieg T, Hunzelmann N. Immediate reaction to Roxithromycin and prick test cross-sensitization to erythromycin and clarithromycin. Dermatology. 1998
  10. 196(3):335-336. [CrossRef] 10. Ünal D, Demir S, Gelincik A, et al. Diagnostic value of oral challenge testing in the diagnosis of macrolide hypersensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018
  11. 6(2):521-527. [CrossRef] 11. Riley L, Mudd L, Baize T, Herzig R. Cross-sensitivity reaction between tacrolimus and macrolide antibiotics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000
  12. 25(8):907-908. [CrossRef] 12. Demoly P, Kropf R, Bircher A, Pichler WJ. Drug hypersensitivity: questionnaire. EAACI interest group on drug hypersensitivity. Allergy. 1999
  13. 54(9):999-1003. [CrossRef] 13. Brockow K, Romano A. Skin tests in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions. Curr Pharm Des. 2008
  14. 14(27):2778-2791. [CrossRef] 14. Gomes ER, Brockow K, Kuyucu S, et al. Drug hypersensitivity in children: report from the pediatric task force of the EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group. Allergy. 2016
  15. 71(2):149-161. [CrossRef] 15. Aberer W, Bircher A, Romano A, et al. Drug provocation testing in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: general considerations. Allergy. 2003
  16. 58(9):854-863. [CrossRef] 16. Romano A, Atan