Journals / Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4

Real-Time Sonoelastography Evaluation of the Lateral Collateral Ligament of Ankle: Comparative Findings Between Athletes and Healthy Subjects

Pages
412–419
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Real-time sonoelastography provides useful additional information for the evaluation of patients with chronic sprains of the ankle LCL.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the sonography and elastography findings in the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injury due to recurrent ankle sprains and to compare them to those of healthy individuals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 108 ankles in 54 athletes and 60 ankles in 30 healthy volunteers were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Real-time sonoelastography provides useful additional information for the evaluation of patients with chronic sprains of the ankle LCL.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the sonography and elastography findings in the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injury due to recurrent ankle sprains and to compare them to those of healthy individuals. Methods: A total of 108 ankles in 54 athletes and 60 ankles in 30 healthy volunteers were included. The LCL, consisting of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and the posterior talofibular ligament (PTFL), was evaluated for images in the following three sections: proximal, middle and distal. Longitudinal images of each ten- don were obtained using ultrasound (US) and real-time sonoelastography. Degeneration of each tendon was evaluated in four grades and the length and thickness were measured in sonographic images. Real-time sonoelastography images were evaluated in four grades for elasticity pattern and strain ratios. Results: The length of ATFL was shorter in the patient group than in the control group (p=0.028). There was no difference between the patient and control group for ligament thicknes. Sonographic grades in the patient group were statistically increased compared to thecontrol group for ATFL, CFL and PTFL ligaments (p<0.001). Conclusion: US can be used as a non-invasive diagnostic method to demonstrate ankle LCL injuries in athletes. Real-time sonoelastography provides useful additional information for the evaluation of patients with chronic sprains of the ankle LCL.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKÖZSOY, A. K., ÖZER, T., VOYVODA, N., FARİZ, B. (2021). Real-Time Sonoelastography Evaluation of the Lateral Collateral Ligament of Ankle: Comparative Findings Between Athletes and Healthy Subjects. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4, 412–419. https://ajindex.com/articles/418209

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Fong DT, Hong Y, Chan LK, Yung PS, Chan KM. A systemat- ic review on ankle injury and ankle sprain in sports. Sports Med 2007;37:73–94
  2. Rodineau J, Foltz V, Dupond P. Sprained ankle in children. Ann Re- adapt Med Phys 2004;47:317–23
  3. Golditz T, Steib S, Pfeifer K, Uder M, Gelse K, Janka R, et al. Functional ankle instability as a risk factor for osteoarthritis: using T2-mapping to analyze early cartilage degeneration in the ankle joint of young athletes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014;22:1377–85
  4. Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Horisberger M, Fung TS. Lig- amentous posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 2006;34:612–20
  5. Frost SC, Amendola A. Is stress radiography necessary in the diagno- sis of acute or chronic ankle instability. Clin J Sport Med 1999;9:40– 5
  6. Oae K, Takao M, Uchio Y, Ochi M. Evaluation of anterior talofibular ligament injury with stress radiography, ultrasonography and MR im- aging. Skeletal Radiol 2010;39:41–7
  7. Chew K, Stevens KJ, Wang TG, Fredericson M, Lew HL. Introduc- tion to diagnostic musculoskeletal ultrasound: part 2, examination of the lower limb. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87:238–48
  8. Nofsinger C, Konin JG. Diagnostic ultrasound in sports medi- cine: current concepts and advances. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2009;17:25–30 9. Cheng Y, Cai Y, Wang Y. Value of ultrasonography for detecting chronic injury of the lateral ligaments of the ankle joint compared with ultrasonography findings. Br J Radiol 2014;87:20130406 10. Battaglia PJ, Craig K, Kettner NW. Ultrasonography in the assess- ment of lateral ankle ligament injury, instability, and anterior ankle impingement: a diagnostic case report. J Chiropr Med 2015;14:265– 9
  9. Radwan A, Bakowski J, Dew S, Greenwald B, Hyde E, Webber N. Effectiveness of ultrasonography in diagnosing chronic lateral ankle instability: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2016;11:164– 74
  10. Lee SH, Chang JM, Cho N, Koo HR, Yi A, Kim SJ, et al. Practice guideline for the performance of breast ultrasound elastography. Ul- trasonography 2014;33:3–10
  11. Moon HJ, Sung JM, Kim EK, Yoon JH, Youk JH, Kwak JY. Diagnos- tic performance of gray-scale US and elastography in solid thyroid nodules. Radiology 2012;262:1002–13
  12. Kyung-Sik Ahn, Chang Ho Kang, Suk-Joo Hong, Jeong WK. Ul- trasound elastography of lateral epicondylosis: clinical feasibility of quantitative elastographic measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:1094–9
  13. De Zordo T, Chhem R, Smekal V, Feuchtner