Journals / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Respiratory Disability in The Van Region Based on the Medical Board Reports

Pages
65–70
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We believe that the present study will help determination of the etiology of respiratory disability and contribute to any action on prevention of these disorders in our region

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVES: Respiratory system disorders have an impact on daily living activities of subjects, resulting in disability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study aimed to review the records of patients with a respiratory disability report from our medical board, and contribute to the national and regional statistics on disability.MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed sociodemographic characteristics, respiratory diseases and disability rates of the patients who were examined by the Chest Diseases Department during the Medical Board evaluations in our hospital between January 1st and July 1st, 2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We believe that the present study will help determination of the etiology of respiratory disability and contribute to any action on prevention of these disorders in our region
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

OBJECTIVES: Respiratory system disorders have an impact on daily living activities of subjects, resulting in disability. Data should be gathered on disability for health services. The present study aimed to review the records of patients with a respiratory disability report from our medical board, and contribute to the national and regional statistics on disability.MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed sociodemographic characteristics, respiratory diseases and disability rates of the patients who were examined by the Chest Diseases Department during the Medical Board evaluations in our hospital between January 1st and July 1st, 2014. RESULTS: Among 4285 patients whose applications were submitted to the medical board for evaluation, 401 (9.3%) had a respiratory disease. Of these patients, 163 were male, and 238 were female, with a mean age of 64.2 years. The most common diseases associated with disability were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and sequelae tuberculosis.The disability rating for respiratory system was 80% in 24.9% of patients, 40% in 34.7% of patients, and 20% in 40.4% of patients. Patients with a respiratory disability report were also considered disabled by the departments of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Cardiology and Eye diseases. There was a positive correlation between disability rating and age, and a negative correlation between forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1) and oxigen saturation measured by pulse oximeter (SpO2) values (p= 0.002; p< 0.001; p< 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, smokers had a higher disability rating compared to non-smokers (p= 0.02).CONCLUSION: In Turkey, we have limited number of studies about respiratory disability. We believe that the present study will help determination of the etiology of respiratory disability and contribute to any action on prevention of these disorders in our region

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİLİNGİR, B. M. (2016). Respiratory Disability in The Van Region Based on the Medical Board Reports. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 65–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/418148

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Disability criteria, board of health regulation on classification and reports to be given to persons with disabilities. Ministry of Family and Social Policies No. 28 173, the Official Gazette dated January 14, 2012, Ankara
  2. Turkey Disability Survey 2002. State Institute of Statistics, 1 edition. State Institute of Statistics, Printing Division, 2002, Ankara
  3. Baykan Z. Disability, handicap, disability, its causes and prevention. Journal of Continuing Medical Education Turkish Medical Association 2000;9
  4. Turkish Thoracic Society. The Guideline of Disability Evaluation in Pulmonary Disease 2005;6:1-22
  5. Beşer E, Atasoylu G, Akgör Ş, Ergin F, Çullu E. The prevalence of disability in Aydın city center, etiology and social dimension. Preventive Medicine Bulletin 2006;5:267-75
  6. Yılmaz H, Kesiktas N, Eren B, Köse R. The rate of disability and disabled people condition in the provinces of Istanbul. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 1998;1:51-3
  7. Akar T, Demirel B. The analysis of disableds applied to university hospital. Türkiye Klinikleri J Foren Med 2008;5:101-8. [CrossRef] 8. Uskun E, Oztürk M, Kisioglu AN. Epidemiology of impairment, disability and handicapped in Isparta. Sağlık ve Toplum 2005;15:90-100
  8. Berk S, Sanli GC, Ozsahin SL, Dogan OT, Arslan S, Akkurt I. Respiratory disability at a university hospital evaluation practice: analysis of 136 patients. Tuberk Toraks 2012;60:145-52. [CrossRef] 10. Kuschner WG, Stark P. Occupatonal lung disease Pt 1 identifying work related asthma and other disorders. Postgraduate Med 2003;113:70-8. [CrossRef] 11. Akkurt I, Altınors M, Simsek C, Sevgi E, Kelesoglu A, Ardıc S. The factors affecting survival in cases of Coal Workers Pneumoconiosis and Slicosis who had taken disability. Community and Physician 1997;12:17-21
  9. Wang XR, Christiani DC. Respiratory symptoms and functional status in workers exposed to silica, asbestos, and coal mine dusts. Occup Environ Med 2000;42:1076-84. [CrossRef] 13. Calverley PM, Walker P. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet 2003;362:1053-61. [CrossRef] 14. Golshan M, Faghihi M, Marandi MM. Indoor women jobs and pulmonary risks in rural areas of Isfahan, Iran, 2000. Respir Med 2002;96:382-8. [CrossRef] 15. Ozbay B, Uzun K, Arslan H, Zehir I. Functional and radiological impairment in women highly exposed to indoor biomass fuels. Respirology 2001;6:255-8. [CrossRef] 16. Speizer FE. Occupational and environmental lung diseases: an overview. Environ Health Perspect 2000;108:6