Journals / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

Long-Term Survival of Patients with Tracheostomy Having Different Diseases Followed up in the Respiratory Intensive Care Unit Outpatient Clinic: Which Patients are Lucky?

Pages
182–187
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mostimportant decision triangle is the patient's acceptance (A), family support (B), and tracheostomy indication (C), and this may vary fromcountry to country depending on the beliefs of subjects

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVES: Tracheostomy is a method of separating a patient from the mechanical ventilator in the intensive care unit (ICU).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thelong-term survivors among patients followed up with tracheostomy and ventilator in the respiratory ICU (RICU) outpatient clinic due todifferent diseases were investigated.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospectively designed cohort study between January 2004 and July 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mostimportant decision triangle is the patient's acceptance (A), family support (B), and tracheostomy indication (C), and this may vary fromcountry to country depending on the beliefs of subjects
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

OBJECTIVES: Tracheostomy is a method of separating a patient from the mechanical ventilator in the intensive care unit (ICU). Thelong-term survivors among patients followed up with tracheostomy and ventilator in the respiratory ICU (RICU) outpatient clinic due todifferent diseases were investigated.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospectively designed cohort study between January 2004 and July 2018. Patients withchronic respiratory failure followed up with tracheostomy and/or ventilator at the RICU outpatient clinic were included in the study. Age,gender, indications and date of tracheostomy, use of domestic mechanical ventilation, and mortality were recorded. The groups werecompared according to age, gender, and tracheostomy indication diseases, and the 1–3-year long-term mortality rates were analyzed bythe Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and the Cox regression test was performed.RESULTS: A total of 134 (64% male) patients with a median age of 66 (54–73) years were included in the study. The indications for tracheostomy were heart failure (HF) and cerebrovascular diseases (38.1%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (23.1%), neuromuscular diseases (22.4%), obesity hypoventilation (9.7%), and kyphoscoliosis (6.7%). Mortality was higher in patients >75 years oldin the 3-year follow-up (p=0.022). The 3-year mortality hazard ratio (HR) factors and 95% confidence interval (CI) were as follows: age>75 years HR=1.71 (95% CI, 1.03–2.82; p<0.036) and HF and cerebrovascular disease diseases sequela HR=1.84 (95% CI, 1.03–3.29;p<0.041) significantly increased the 3-year mortality, and having COPD decreased mortality in 46% (p<0.041).CONCLUSION: Patients with neuromuscular disorders, kyphoscoliosis, and COPD who have undergone tracheostomy were the luckiestgroup according to the 3-year survival rates, whereas patients with HF and cerebrovascular diseases were the unluckiest ones. The mostimportant decision triangle is the patient's acceptance (A), family support (B), and tracheostomy indication (C), and this may vary fromcountry to country depending on the beliefs of subjects

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSOY, E., OCAKLI, B. (2019). Long-Term Survival of Patients with Tracheostomy Having Different Diseases Followed up in the Respiratory Intensive Care Unit Outpatient Clinic: Which Patients are Lucky?. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 182–187. https://ajindex.com/articles/418116

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Carson SS. Outcomes of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Ambrosino N, Vitacca M. The patient needing prolonged mechanical ventilation: a narrative review. Multidiscip Respir Med 2018
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Trouillet JL, Collange O, Belafia F, et al. Tracheotomy in the intensive care unit: Guidelines from a French expert panel: The French Intensive Care Society and the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2018
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Kollef MH, Ahrens TS, Shannon W. Clinical predictors and outcomes for patients requiring tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1999
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Restrepo R, Kahn D, Patel P, et al. One Year Mortality Rates of Tracheostomy Cases: Life after the Knife. J Emerg Med Trauma Surg Care 2015
  6. Alabi BS, Afolabi OA, Dunmade AD, et al. Indications and outcome of tracheostomy in Ilorin, North Central Nigeria: 10 years review. Ann Afr Med 2018
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for diagnosis, management, and prevention of COPD (updated 2017) Available from: http://www.goldcopd.org 8. Olson AL, Zwillich C. The obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Am J Med 2005
  8. [CrossRef] 9. Lloyd-Owen SJ, Donaldson GC, Ambrosino N, et al. Patterns of home mechanical ventilation use in Europe: results from the Eurovent survey. Eur Respir J 2005
  9. [CrossRef] 10. Karakurt Z. Evde mekanik ventilasyon. Yoğun Bakım Dergisi 2004
  10. MacIntyre NR, Epstein SK, Carson S, et al. Management of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilations: report of a NAMDRC concensus conference. Chest 2005
  11. [CrossRef] 12. MacIntyre NR, Cook DJ, Ely EW Jr, et al. American College of Chest Physicians
  12. American Association for Respiratory Care
  13. American College of Critical Care Medicine. Evidence-based guidelines for weaning and discontinuing ventilatory support: a collective task force facilitated by the American College of Chest Physicians
  14. the American Association for Respiratory Care
  15. and the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 2001
  16. 120(6 Suppl):375S-95S. [CrossRef] 13. Marchese S, Lo Coco D, Lo Coco A. Outcome and attitudes toward home tracheostomy ventilation of consecutive patients: a 10-year experience. Respir Med 2008
  17. [CrossRef] 14. Gucyetmez B, Atalan HK, Cakar N
  18. Turkish Tracheotomy Survey Group. Elective trach