Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4

MODEL-BASED ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF RECYCLE RATIOS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF AN A²O PROCESS

Pages
1741–1751
Publication Date
2021-10-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that not only IR ratio but also RAS ratio affects both nitrogen and phosphorus removal processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study presents findings of a modeling work in which the effects of internal recycle (IR) and return activated sludge (RAS) ratios on the treatment performance of an A²O process were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Simulations were performed using activated sludge model no.3 extended with biological phosphorus removal processes at an influent wastewater temperature of 20°C.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that not only IR ratio but also RAS ratio affects both nitrogen and phosphorus removal processes.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:A²O process · internal recycle · return activated sludge

Abstract

This study presents findings of a modeling work in which the effects of internal recycle (IR) and return activated sludge (RAS) ratios on the treatment performance of an A²O process were investigated. Simulations were performed using activated sludge model no.3 extended with biological phosphorus removal processes at an influent wastewater temperature of 20°C. The results showed that not only IR ratio but also RAS ratio affects both nitrogen and phosphorus removal processes. The removal efficiencies for total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) changed between 71%–83% and 53%–80%, respectively, at different IR and RAS ratios. On the other hand, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN), and total suspended solids (TSS) removal efficiencies stayed relatively constant at around 90%, 96%, and 93%, respectively, with varying IR and RAS ratios. Results indicated that an optimum set of IR and RAS ratios can be found out by activated sludge modeling. For A²O process, an IR ratio of 2.5 to 3.5 at a RAS ratio of 0.75 to 0.90 offer the best performance in terms of both TN and TP removal efficiencies.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, N. M., DEMİR, S. (2021). MODEL-BASED ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF RECYCLE RATIOS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF AN A²O PROCESS. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4, 1741–1751. https://ajindex.com/articles/418054

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Yuan C., Wang B., Peng Y., Li X., Zhang Q., Hu T., “Enhanced nutrient removal of simultaneous partial nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal (SPNDPR) in a single-stage anaerobic/micro-aerobic sequencing batch reactor for treating real sewage with low carbon/nitrogen”, Chemosphere, 257, 127097, 2020
  2. Pelaz L., Gomez A., Letona A., Garralon G., Fdz-Polanco M., “Nitrogen removal in domestic wastewater. Effect of nitrate recycling and COD/N ratio”, Chemosphere, 212, 8-14, 2018
  3. Bertanza G., Menoni L., Capoferri G.U., Pedrazzani R., “Promoting biological phosphorus removal in a full scale pre-denitrification wastewater treatment plant”, Journal of Environmental Management, 254, 109803, 2020
  4. Ji B., Zhu L., Wang S., Qin H., Ma Y., Liu Y., “A novel micro-ferrous dosing strategy for enhancing biologicalphosphorus removal from municipal wastewater”, Science of the Total Environment, 704, 135453, 2020
  5. Campo R., Sguanci S., Caffaz S., Mazzoli L., Ramazzotti M., Lubello C., Lotti T., “Efficient carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus removal from low C/N real domestic wastewater with aerobic granular sludge”, BioresourceTechnology, 305, 122961, 2020
  6. Li L., Song K., Yeerken S., Geng S., Liu D., Dai Z., Xie F., Zhou X., Wang Q., “Effect evaluation of microplastics on activated sludge nitrification and denitrification”, Science of the Total Environment, 707, 135953, 2020
  7. Tian M., Zhao F., Shen X., Chu K., Wang J., Chen S., Guo Y., Liu H., “The first metagenome of activated sludge from full-scale anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A2O) nitrogen and phosphorus removal reactor using Illumina sequencing”, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 35, 181-190, 2015
  8. Han Y., Yang K., Yang T., Zhang M., Li L., “Bioaerosols emission and exposure risk of a wastewater treatment plant with A2O treatment process”, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 169, 161-168, 2019
  9. Liu W., Wu Y., Zhang S., Gao Y., Jiang Y., Horn H., Li J., “Successful granulation and microbial differentiation of activated sludge in anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic (A2O) reactor with two-zonesedimentation tank treating municipal sewage”, Water Research, 178, 115825, 2020
  10. Peng S., Deng S., Li D., Xie B., Yang X., Lai C., Sun S., Yao H., “Iron-carbon galvanic cells strengthened anaerobic/anoxic/oxic process (Fe/C-A2O) for high-nitrogen/phosphorus and low-carbon sewage treatment”, Science of the Total Environment, 722, 137657, 2020
  11. Baeza J.A., Gabriel D., Lafuente J., “Effect of in