Journals / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

Violation of the Tobacco Control Law by Drivers in Vehicles in Two Streets in İzmir: A Descriptive Study

Pages
132–135
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In multivariate analysis, not having children increases (OR: 8.4) the risk of the violation ofthe law.CONCLUSION: The violation of the law was high, but the drivers seemed to be aware of the harms of smoking by looking at the increasedrisk of the violation in vehicles, in which no child was carried as passengers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVES: After signing and approving the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), Turkey amended laws on tobaccocontrol in 2008 and also expanded the smoking ban in 2013 to include drivers in all vehicles.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Logistic regression for the violation of the law wasconducted.RESULTS: Law violation prevalence is 7.2%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In multivariate analysis, not having children increases (OR: 8.4) the risk of the violation ofthe law.CONCLUSION: The violation of the law was high, but the drivers seemed to be aware of the harms of smoking by looking at the increasedrisk of the violation in vehicles, in which no child was carried as passengers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

OBJECTIVES: After signing and approving the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), Turkey amended laws on tobaccocontrol in 2008 and also expanded the smoking ban in 2013 to include drivers in all vehicles. Four years later, this amendment does notseem as effective. The aim of this study was to observe violation of the law by the drivers and to analyze the association between genderof the driver, type of the vehicle, approximate age group definition of the passenger (either child or adult), and the law violation in twostreets in Konak district, İzmir, Turkey.MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, two observer teams were located in two different busy streets on the sameafternoon and they collected data on the violation of the law, gender of the driver, approximate age group definition of the passengers(either adult or child), and type of the vehicle (special, taxi, or other commercial). Logistic regression for the violation of the law wasconducted.RESULTS: Law violation prevalence is 7.2%. In univariate analysis, the gender of the driver and having at least one child as a passengerwere associated with the violation of the law. In multivariate analysis, not having children increases (OR: 8.4) the risk of the violation ofthe law.CONCLUSION: The violation of the law was high, but the drivers seemed to be aware of the harms of smoking by looking at the increasedrisk of the violation in vehicles, in which no child was carried as passengers.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKOYUN, E., ALÇİÇEK, M. S., SELEK, S. (2018). Violation of the Tobacco Control Law by Drivers in Vehicles in Two Streets in İzmir: A Descriptive Study. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 132–135. https://ajindex.com/articles/418028

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ezzati M, Lopez AD. Measuring the accumulated hazards of smoking: global and regional estimates for 2000. Tob Control 2003 Mar;12:79-85
  2. Roemer R, Taylor A, Lariviere J. Origins of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Am J Public Health 2005;95:936-8. [CrossRef] 3. Bilir N. Level of Tobacco Control in Turkey (Türkiye tütün kontrolünde dünyanın neresinde?). Turk Thorac J 2009;10:31-4
  3. Elbek O, Kılınç O, Ayfer Aytemur Z, et al. Tobacco Control in Turkey. Turk Thorac J 2015;16,141-50
  4. Ay P, Evrengil E, Guner M, et al. Noncompliance to smoke-free law: which hospitality premises are more prone? Public Health 2016;141:1-6
  5. Öztürk B, Kosku H, Guven İ, et al. A Study Examining Compliance with the Anti-Tobacco Law Nb. 4207 Inside Taxis. Turk Thorac J 2017;18:88-93
  6. Gilroy I, Donnelly N, Matthews W, et al. Smoking in vehicles is lower than mobile telephone use while driving, but is socially patterned. Ir Med J 2013;106:118-20
  7. Johansson A, Halling A, Hermansson G, et al. Assessment of Smoking Behaviors in the Home and Their Influence on Children's Passive Smoking: Development of a Questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol 2005;15:453-9. [CrossRef] 9. Public Health Institution of Turkey. Global Adult Tobacco Survey Turkey 2012. Int: 2014. Report No: 948
  8. Hatsukami DK, Stead LF, Gupta PC. Tobacco addiction. Lancet 2008;371:2027-38. [CrossRef] 11. Lee S, Ling PM, Glantz SA. The vector of the tobacco epidemic: tobacco industry practices in low and middle-income countries. Cancer Causes Control 2012;23:117-29. [CrossRef]