Journals / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Modified STOP-BANG Questionnaire with National Anthropometric Obesity Indexes

Pages
103–107
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sensitivityfor moderate (AHI≥15) and severe OSA (AHI≥30) was identical for both questionnaires.CONCLUSION: The STOP-BANG questionnaire has an excellent sensitivity, but modest specificity and adding national obesity indexesfor neck circumference achieved similar results in terms of sensitivity and specificity with the original questionnaire.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a very common sleep-related disorder and has many medical complications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We used 40 cm and 36 cm as the cut-off values for neck circumference, thus scoring patients accordingly andcreating a modified STOP-BANG score with national anthropometric obesity indexes.RESULTS: The median neck circumferences were 41 (39-44) cm, 40 (37-42) cm, and 43 (40-45) cm for total population, female gender,and male gender, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Sensitivityfor moderate (AHI≥15) and severe OSA (AHI≥30) was identical for both questionnaires.CONCLUSION: The STOP-BANG questionnaire has an excellent sensitivity, but modest specificity and adding national obesity indexesfor neck circumference achieved similar results in terms of sensitivity and specificity with the original questionnaire.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a very common sleep-related disorder and has many medical complications. Althoughthe STOP-BANG questionnaire is an attractive screening tool because of high sensitivity, it lacks power in specificity. The aim of thepresent study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of standard STOP-BANG and a modified STOP-BANG questionnaire,using national cut-off values for neck circumference that determined OSA, in a sleep center population.MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred eighty-five participants who were referred to the sleep-disordered breathing clinic wereconsecutively enrolled. We used 40 cm and 36 cm as the cut-off values for neck circumference, thus scoring patients accordingly andcreating a modified STOP-BANG score with national anthropometric obesity indexes.RESULTS: The median neck circumferences were 41 (39-44) cm, 40 (37-42) cm, and 43 (40-45) cm for total population, female gender,and male gender, respectively. The mean STOP-BANG score was 4.5±1.5, and the mean modified STOP-BANG score was 4.9±1.5.Discrimination of OSA measured by area under the curve for both questionnaires is comparable (p>0.05). Sensitivity to define OSA(apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)≥5) was 92.2% and 93.8% for original and modified STOP-BANG questionnaire, respectively. Sensitivityfor moderate (AHI≥15) and severe OSA (AHI≥30) was identical for both questionnaires.CONCLUSION: The STOP-BANG questionnaire has an excellent sensitivity, but modest specificity and adding national obesity indexesfor neck circumference achieved similar results in terms of sensitivity and specificity with the original questionnaire.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, N. A. A., DİLEKTAŞLI, A. G., ÇETİNOĞLU, E. D., URSAVAŞ, A., KARADAĞ, M. (2019). Diagnostic Accuracy of a Modified STOP-BANG Questionnaire with National Anthropometric Obesity Indexes. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 103–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/418020

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kapur VK, Auckley DH, Chowdhuri S, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnostic Testing for Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Sleep Med 2017
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Chung F, Yegneswaran B, Liao P, et al. STOP questionnaire: a tool to screen patients for obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology 2008
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Bille J, Bille-Hasselstrøm C, Petersen CG. Translation and validation of the Stop-Bang Questionnaire for obstructive sleep apnoea into Danish. Dan Med J 2015
  4. A5158. 4. Reis R, Teixeira F, Martins V, et al. Validation of a Portuguese version of the STOP-Bang questionnaire as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea: Analysis in a sleep clinic. Rev Port Pneumol (2006) 2015
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Ha SC, Lee DL, Abdullah VJ, et al. CA. Evaluation and validation of four translated Chinese questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea patients in Hong Kong. Sleep Breath 2014
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Acar HV, Kaya A, Yücel F, et al. Validation of the STOP-Bang Questionnaire: an Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Screening Tool in Turkish Population Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2013
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Nagappa M, Liao P, Wong J, et al. Validation of the STOP-Bang Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea among Different Populations: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis. PLoS One 2015
  8. e0143697. [CrossRef] 8. Nagappa M, Wong J, Singh M, et al. An update on the various practical applications of the STOP-Bang questionnaire in anesthesia, surgery, and perioperative medicine. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2017
  9. Chung F, Yang Y, Brown R, Liao P. Alternative scoring models of STOP-bang questionnaire improve specificity to detect undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med 2014
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Nahapetian R, Silva GE, Vana KD, et al. Weighted STOP-Bang and screening for sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep Breath 2016
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Farney RJ, Walker BS, Farney RM, et al. The STOP-Bang equivalent model and prediction of severity of obstructive sleep apnea: relation to polysomnographic measurements of the apnea/hypopnea index. J Clin Sleep Med 2011
  12. 65B. [CrossRef] 12. Chung F, Chau E, Yang Y, et al. Serum bicarbonate level improves specificity of STOP-Bang screening for obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 2013
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Sangkum L, Klair I, Limsuwat C, et al. Incorporating body-typ