Journals / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

MRI in Evaluation of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules

Pages
90–96
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Using theseMRI parameters might decrease unnecessary biopsy rates and complications of biopsies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), T2-weighted image (T2WI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps’ threshold values before computed tomography (CT)-guided transthorasicbiopsy in solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) by describing tumoral cell density.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had SPN were prospectively evaluated with MRI (T1WI, T2WI) and DWI (b=0, b=500,b=1000).The ADC maps were created for each patient.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Before the biopsy, lesion muscle ratios (LMR) at T2WI, ADC value, and lesionspinal cord ratio at each b values were noted.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Using theseMRI parameters might decrease unnecessary biopsy rates and complications of biopsies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), T2-weighted image (T2WI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps’ threshold values before computed tomography (CT)-guided transthorasicbiopsy in solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) by describing tumoral cell density.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had SPN were prospectively evaluated with MRI (T1WI, T2WI) and DWI (b=0, b=500,b=1000).The ADC maps were created for each patient. Before the biopsy, lesion muscle ratios (LMR) at T2WI, ADC value, and lesionspinal cord ratio at each b values were noted. The measurements were correlated with the histopathological results.RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were included in the study: 30.2% (n=16) were female, and 69.8% (n=37) were male. Among them, 17lesions (32.1%) were benign, and 36 lesions (67.9%) were malignant. The age varied between 40 and 82 years, with a mean of 61.7±9.1years. The SPN diameters were between 10 and 30 mm, and the median was 24 mm. The LSR0 and LMR values were not statisticallysignificant in detecting malignancy. LSR500 >0.53 value can predict malignancy with 100% sensitivity and 70.6% specificity. LSR1000>0.53 can predict malignancy with 88.9% sensitivity and 88.2% specificity. Setting the cut-off value at 0.9×10-3, the ADC values had asensitivity of 72.2% and a specificity of 88.2% for predicting malignancy.CONCLUSION: For SPN follow-up, a new following-up protocol can be safely established using DWI and ADC mapping. Using theseMRI parameters might decrease unnecessary biopsy rates and complications of biopsies.

🔖

Cite This Article

FATİHOĞLU, E., BİRİ, S., AYDİN, S., ERGÜN, E., KOŞAR, P. N. (2019). MRI in Evaluation of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 90–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/418004

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Murthy SC, Rice TW. The solitary pulmonary nodule: a primer on differential diagnosis. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Winer-Muram HT. The solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiology 2006
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Zerhouni EA, Stitik FP, Siegelman SS, Naidich DP, et al. CT of the pulmonary nodule: a cooperative study. Radiology 1986
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Siegelman SS, Zerhouni EA, Leo FP, et al. CT of the solitary pulmonary nodule. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Sener RN. Diffusion MRI: apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the normal brain and a classification of brain disorders based on ADC values. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2001
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Kang Y, Choi SH, Kim YJ, et al. Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-bvalue diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade. Radiology 2011
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Tatli S, Gerbaudo VH, Feeley CM, et al. PET/CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses: initial experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Jin KN, Park CM, Goo JM, et al. Initial experience of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of lung nodules using C-arm conebeam CT systems. Eur Radiol 2010
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Ost D, Fein AM, Feinsilver SH. Clinical practice. The solitary pulmonary nodule. N Engl J Med 2003
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Tang AW, Moss HA, Robertson RJ. The solitary pulmonary nodule. Eur J Radiol 2003
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Lillington GA. Management of solitary pulmonary nodules. How to decide when resection is required. Postgrad Med 1997
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Bekci TT, Senol T, Maden E. The efficacy of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA15- 3), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels in determining the malignancy of solitary pulmonary nodules. J Int Med Res 2009
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Ors F, Deniz O, Bozlar U, et al. High-resolution CT findings in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis: correlation with the degree of smear positivity. J Thorac Imaging 2007
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Basile A, Gregoris A, Antoci B, et al. Malignant change in a benign pulmonary hamarto