Journals / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Turkish Thoracic Society Consensus Report: Interpretation of Spirometry

Türk Toraks Derneği Spirometri Değerlendirme Uzlaşı Raporu

Pages
69–89
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This report is prepared to provide a basis for a standardized asssessment in our pulmonary function test in our country.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Currently, the criteria for applying and evaluating spirometer measurements have been defined by American and European Respiratory Societies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Several pulmonary function test laboratories in Turkey as well as in the world use these standards.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This report is prepared to provide a basis for a standardized asssessment in our pulmonary function test in our country.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Currently, the criteria for applying and evaluating spirometer measurements have been defined by American and European Respiratory Societies. Several pulmonary function test laboratories in Turkey as well as in the world use these standards. However, different interpretation results are observed in different pulmonary function test laboratories. This report is prepared to provide a basis for a standardized asssessment in our pulmonary function test in our country.

Özet

Günümüzde spirometre ölçümlerinin uygulama ve yorumlamanitelik güvencesi ''American Thoracic Society / European Respiratory Society'' standartları ile belirlenmiştir. Dünyada olduğu gibiülkemizde de birçok laboratuvar bu standartları kullanmaktadır.Buna karşın, farklı laboratuvarlardan farklı değerlendirmesonuçları görebilmek mümkündür. Bu rapor, ülkemizdeki solunum fonksiyon testi laboratuvarlarında yapılan değerlendirmelerin standardizasyonunu sağlamak amacı ile hazırlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUBAY, G., DİLEKTAŞLI, A. G., BÖREKÇİ, Ş., YILDIZ, Ö., KIYAN, E., GEMİCİOĞLU, B. (2019). Turkish Thoracic Society Consensus Report: Interpretation of Spirometry. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 69–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/418003

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Solunum fonksiyon testleri. Toraks Kitapları, Sayı 16. Saryal SB, Ulubay G, editörler. İstanbul: AVES yayıncılık, ADA ofset Matbacılık Ticaret Limited Şirketi, 2012
  2. Klinik solunum fonksiyon testleri. Yıldırım N, Demir T, editörler. İkinci baskı, İstanbul: Macenta Eğitim Yayıncılığı Ltd Şti, 2011
  3. Manual of pulmonary function testing. Ruppel GL. Seventh edition. St. Louis, Mosby, 1998
  4. Ulubay G, Köktürk N, Görek Dilektaşlı A, et al. Turkish Thoracic Society national spirometry and laboratory standards. Turk Thorac J 2017;65:117-30. [CrossRef] 5. Cotes JE, Chinn DJ, Miller MR. Lung Function: physiology, measurement and application in medicine. Sixth edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006: 111-7. [CrossRef] 6. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco, et al. ATS/ERS Task Force: Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J 2005;26:948-68. [CrossRef] 7. Culver BH, Graham BL, Coates AL, et al. Recommendations for a Standardized Pulmonary Function Report. An Official American Thoracic Society Technical Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;196:1463-72. [CrossRef] 8. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global Strategy For The Diagnosis, Management, And Prevention Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (Revised 2018). Available from: URL: http://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ GOLD-2018-v6.0-FINAL-revised-20-Nov_WMS.pdf
  5. Kronik Obstrüktif Akciğer Hastalığı Koruma, Tanı ve Tedavi Raporu 2014. Turk Thorac J 2014;15(Suppl 2):1-85
  6. Global Initiative for Asthma Management and Prevention, 2018. Available from: www.ginaasthma.org
  7. Türk Toraks Derneği, Astım Tanı ve Tedavi Rehberi, 2016 Güncellemesi. Available from: http://www.toraks.org.tr/book. aspx?list=2212&menu=288
  8. Roberts SD, Farber MO, Knox KS, et al. FEV1/FVC ratio of 70% misclassifies patients with obstruction at extremes of age. Chest 2006;130:200-6. [CrossRef] 13. Vollmer WM, Gislason P, Burney P, et al. Comparison of spirometry criteria for the diagnosis of COPD: results from the BOLD study. Eur Respir J 2009;34:588-97. [CrossRef] 14. Quanjer PH, Brazzale DJ, Boros PW, Pretto JJ. Implications of adopting the Global Lungs Initiative 2012 all-age reference equations for spirometry. Eur Respir J 2013; 42:1046-54. [CrossRef] 15. Jing J, Huang T, Cui W, et al. Should FEV1/FEV6 replace FEV1/ FVC ratio to detect airway obstruction? Chest 2009;135:991-8. [CrossRef] 16. Demir T, Ikitimur H, Koç N, Yıldırım N. The role of FEV6 in the detection