Journals / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5

Effect of Rebound Thymic Hyperplasia on Survival in Chemotherapy-Treated Lung Cancer

Pages
303–307
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study is to determine the overall survival effect of rebound thymic hyperplasia (RTH) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with systemic chemotherapy (CT).MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as retrospective case series.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVES: Thymus is a lymphoepithelial system in which cells responsible for the immune system are produced and directed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The frequency of RTH development and the relationship between RTH development and survival was investigated.RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 59, and nine of 13 patients (69.4%) with RTH were iden-tified as stable disease, two patients had a partial response (15.3%), and two were evaluated as progres-sive disease (15.3%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study is to determine the overall survival effect of rebound thymic hyperplasia (RTH) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with systemic chemotherapy (CT).MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as retrospective case series.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

OBJECTIVES: Thymus is a lymphoepithelial system in which cells responsible for the immune system are produced and directed. The aim of this study is to determine the overall survival effect of rebound thymic hyperplasia (RTH) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with systemic chemotherapy (CT).MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as retrospective case series. One hundred and thirty patients who met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Demographic data, type of tumor, and treatments administered were recorded. The frequency of RTH development and the relationship between RTH development and survival was investigated.RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 59, and nine of 13 patients (69.4%) with RTH were iden-tified as stable disease, two patients had a partial response (15.3%), and two were evaluated as progres-sive disease (15.3%). Of the remaining 117 patients, 78 (66.6%) had stable disease, 11 (9.4%) had com-plete response, 21 (17.9%) had partial response, and seven patients were evaluated as having progressive disease (5.9%). The patients were categorized into two groups: Group 1 - without RTH and group 2 - with RTH. Thirteen (10%) of 130 patients developed RTH (group 2), while the remaining 117 (90%) patients did not have RTH (group 1). There was no difference between the two groups (59.1 years) in terms of age (p = 0.933). The RTH developed after a median time of 4.5 months (2-7 months) after CT had been administered. Overall survival was longer in patients with RTH than in patients without RTH (20.04 months) (95% CI, 4.79-35.29) vs. 10.05 months (95% CI, 8.74-11.36; p=0.049).CONCLUSION: The developing of RTH during systemic CT may be a prognostic marker in stage 4 non-small cell lung cancer.

🔖

Cite This Article

DENİZ, S., SUSAM, S., AKSEL, N., GAYAF, M., GÜLDAVAL, F., ERBAYCU, A. E., YILMAZ, U. (2020). Effect of Rebound Thymic Hyperplasia on Survival in Chemotherapy-Treated Lung Cancer. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5, 303–307. https://ajindex.com/articles/417973

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Junqueira LC, Carneiro J. T. Junqueira's Basic Histology. Text and Atlas, Thirteenth Edition, 2009;266-8
  2. Ford ME, Stevens R, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, et al. Rebound thymic hyperplasia after pneumonectomy and chemotherapy for primary synovial sarcoma. J Thorac Imaging 2008;23:178- 81. [Crossref] 3. Sokol E, Huang E, Pytel P, et al. Rebound thymic hyperplasia following high dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplant in three neuroblastoma patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2017;64:doi: 10.1002/pbc.26226. Epub 2016 Sep 24. [Crossref] 4. Chen CH, Hsiao CC, Chen YC, et al. Rebound Thymic Hyperplasia after Chemotherapy in Children with Lymphoma. Pediatr Neonatol 2017;58:151-7. [Crossref] 5. Ackman JB, Kovacina B, Carter BW, et al. Sex difference in normal thymic appearance in adults 20-30 years of age. Radiology 2013;268:245-53. [Crossref] 6. Araki T, Nishino M, Gao W, et al. Normal Thymus in Adults: Appearance on CT and Associations with Age, Sex, BMI and Smoking. Eur Radiol 2016;26:15-24. [Crossref] 7. Nasseri F, Eftekhari F. Clinical and radiologic review of the normal and abnormal thymus: pearls and pitfalls. Radiographics 2010;30:413-28. [Crossref] 8. Sun DP, Jin H, Ding CY, et al. Thymic hyperplasia after chemotherapy in adults with mature B cell lymphoma and its influence on thymic output and CD4(+) T cells repopulation. Oncoimmunology 2016;5:e1137417. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1137417. eCollection 2016 May. [Crossref] 9. Taub DD, Longo DL. Insights into thymic aging and regeneration. Immunol Rev 2005;205:72-93. [Crossref] 10. Zhen Z, Sun X, Xia Y, et al. Clinical analysis of thymic regrowth following chemotherapy in children and adolescents with malignant lymphoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2010;40:1128-34. [Crossref] 11. DP Pamela, Maxey N, Mohammadi Z, et al. Thymic Hyperplasia after Chemotherapy: Combined Experience of Two Centers. Blood 2015;126:4633. [Crossref] 12. Fouda A, kandil S, Hamid G, et al. Rebound (reactive) thymic hyperplasia after chemotherapy in children with lymphoma. An Pediatr (Barc). 2019. pii: S1695-4033(18)30551-4. doi: 10.1016/j. anpedi.2018.10.021. [Epub ahead of print] [Crossref] 13. Sun DP, Wang L, Ding CY, et al. Investigating Factors Associated with Thymic Regeneration after Chemotherapy in Patients with Lymphoma. Front Immunol. 2016;27;7:654. [Crossref] 14. Gawande RS, Khurana A, Messing S, et al. Differentiation of normal thymus from anterior mediastinal lymphoma and lymphoma recurrence at pediatric PET/CT. Radiology 2012;262: