Journals / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Effect of 8-week Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program on Dyspnea and Functional Capacity of Patients on Waiting List for Lung Transplantation

Pages
110–115
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, a clinicalimprovement was observed in Borg (p=0.000) and MRC scores (p=0.008).CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that 8-week outpatient PR programme consisting of training twice a week is effective to decrease perceived dyspnea and to improve exercise capacity in patients who are on the waiting list for LTx.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of comprehensive, 8-week outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programme consisting of 60-min sessions twice a week under supervision on dyspnea and exercise capacity of patients who were lungtransplantation (LTx) candidates.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2012 and December 2014, medical data of 23 patients on the waiting list for LTx whowere referred to our PR unit and completed 16-session outpatient under direct supervision were retrospectively analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data on exercise capacity as assessed by 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and the rate of perceived dyspnea as assessed by the Borg scale and MedicalResearch Council (MRC) dyspnea scale were recorded.RESULTS: Of 23 patients 57% were males; the mean age was 35±10 (range: 16–48) years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, a clinicalimprovement was observed in Borg (p=0.000) and MRC scores (p=0.008).CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that 8-week outpatient PR programme consisting of training twice a week is effective to decrease perceived dyspnea and to improve exercise capacity in patients who are on the waiting list for LTx.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of comprehensive, 8-week outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programme consisting of 60-min sessions twice a week under supervision on dyspnea and exercise capacity of patients who were lungtransplantation (LTx) candidates.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2012 and December 2014, medical data of 23 patients on the waiting list for LTx whowere referred to our PR unit and completed 16-session outpatient under direct supervision were retrospectively analyzed. Data on exercise capacity as assessed by 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and the rate of perceived dyspnea as assessed by the Borg scale and MedicalResearch Council (MRC) dyspnea scale were recorded.RESULTS: Of 23 patients 57% were males; the mean age was 35±10 (range: 16–48) years. Four patients were operated early, as an appropriate donor was available. Diagnosis was as follows: bronchiectasis (n=10, 44%), silicosis (n=7, 30%), sarcoidosis (n=2, 9%), idiopathicpulmonary firosis (n=1, 4%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n=1, 4%), and others (n=2, 9%). At the end of the program, therewas a signifiant improvement (median: 60 m) in 6MWT scores (360 [70–254] m vs. 300 [139–489] m; p=0.018). In addition, a clinicalimprovement was observed in Borg (p=0.000) and MRC scores (p=0.008).CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that 8-week outpatient PR programme consisting of training twice a week is effective to decrease perceived dyspnea and to improve exercise capacity in patients who are on the waiting list for LTx.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇ, L., PEHLİVAN, E., BALCI, A., BAKAN, N. D. (2020). Effect of 8-week Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program on Dyspnea and Functional Capacity of Patients on Waiting List for Lung Transplantation. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 110–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/417946

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Florian, J, Rubin A, Mattiello R, et al. Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on quality of life and functional capacity in patients on waiting lists for lung transplantation. J Bras Pneumol 2013
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Hook JL, Lederer DJ. Selecting lung transplant candidates: where do current guidelines fall short? Expert Rev Respir Med 2012
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Rochester CL. Pulmonary rehabilitation for patients who undergo lung-volume-reduction surgery or lung transplantation. Respir Care 2008
  4. Foster S, Thomas HM 3rd. Pulmonary rehabilitation in lung disease other than chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Pehlivan E, Balcı A, Kılıç L, et al. Preoperative Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Lung Transplant: Effects on Pulmonary Function, Exercise Capacity, and Quality of Life
  6. First Results in Turkey. Exp Clin Transplant 2018
  7. Ries AL, Bauldoff GS, Carlin BW, et al. Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Joint ACCP/AACVPR Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2007
  8. [CrossRef] 7. Nici L, Donner C, Wouters E, et al. American Thoracic Society/ European Respiratory Society statement on pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006
  9. [CrossRef] 8. Wijkstra PJ, Wempe JB. New tools in pulmonary rehabilitation. Eur Respir J 2011
  10. [CrossRef] 9. Mathur S, Hornblower E, Levy RD. Exercise training before and after lung transplantation. Phys Sportsmed 2009
  11. [CrossRef] 10. Langer D. Rehabilitation in patients before and after lung transplantation. Respiration 2015
  12. [CrossRef] 11. Gloeckl R, Halle M, Kenn K. Interval versus continuous training in lung transplant candidates: a randomized trial. J Heart Lung Transplant 2012
  13. [CrossRef] 12. Li M, Mathur S, Chowdhury NA, et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation in lung transplant candidates. J Heart Lung Transplant 2013
  14. [CrossRef] 13. Rochester CL, Fairburn C, Crouch RH. Pulmonary rehabilitation for respiratory disorders other than chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Chest Med 2014
  15. [CrossRef] 14. Trojetto T, Elliott RJ, Rashid S, et al. Availability, characteristics, and barriers of rehabilitation programs in organ transplant populations across Canada. Clin Transplant 2011
  16. E571-8. [CrossRef] 15. Wickerson L, Rozenberg D, Janaudis-Ferreira T, et al. Physical rehabilitation for lung transplant candidates and recipients: An evidence-informed clinical appro