SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1

Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl and fluzifob-p-butyl herbicides

Bahar ULUS
Müzeyyen ÇELİKSÖZ
Gül ÖZHAN
Pages
5–8
Publication Date
2017-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that FPE and FPB showed no evidence of DNA damage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Human populations are exposed to several toxic substances in the environment, including pesticides.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Cell viability was evaluated by MTT assay in the range of 15.6-500.0 μM exposure concentrations in mouse fibroblast (BALB/3T3) cell line.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that FPE and FPB showed no evidence of DNA damage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl · fluzifob-p-butyl · 3T3 cells

Abstract

Human populations are exposed to several toxic substances in the environment, including pesticides. Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (FPE) and fluzifob-p-butyl (FPB) herbicides are extensively used in agricultural fields due to their high target selectivity and low non-target toxicity. They are known as aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides, and acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor. In the study, we aimed to evaluate the toxic potentials of FPE and FPB herbicides. Cell viability was evaluated by MTT assay in the range of 15.6-500.0 μM exposure concentrations in mouse fibroblast (BALB/3T3) cell line. Also, we investigated their DNA damage potentials on BALB/3T3 cells by using alkaline Comet assay. The results indicated that FPE and FPB showed no evidence of DNA damage. And, the cell viability was more than 20% at 12.5-400 μM exposure concentrations. FPE and FPB might be safe according to our results and the previously studies, and there would be public health benefits from encouraging its use in the place of more toxic herbicide products.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUS, B., ÇELİKSÖZ, M., ÖZHAN, G. (2017). Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl and fluzifob-p-butyl herbicides. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1, 5–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/41791

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Abd-Alrahman SH, Elhalwagy ME, Kotb GA, Farid H, Farag AA, Draz HM, Isa AM, Sabico S (2014). Exposure to difenoconazole, diclofop-methyl alone and combination alters oxidative stress and biochemical parameters in albino rats. Int J Clin Exp Med 7 (10): 3637. • Abudayyak M, Altıncekic T, Özhan G (2017). In vitro toxicological assessment of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles in several mammalian cell types. Biol Trace Element Res 175 (2): 458-465. [CrossRef ] • Asshauer J, Dorn E, Fischer R, Kurzmeier E (1990). Behaviour of fenoxaprop-ethyl in the environment-degradation and effect in the ecosystem. Z Pflanzenkr Pflanzenschutz 12: 417-425. • Bakkali Y, Ruiz-Santaella J P, Osuna M D, Wagner J, Fischer A J, De Prado R (2007). Late watergrass (Echinochloa phyllopogon): mechanisms involved in the resistance to fenoxaprop-p-ethyl. J Agric Food Chem 55 (10): 4052-4058. [CrossRef ] • Betancourt M, Reséndiz A (2006). Effect of two insecticides and two herbicides on the porcine sperm motility patterns using computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) in vitro. Reprod Toxicol 22 (3): 508-512. [CrossRef ] • Bieringer H, Horlein G, Langeluddeke P, Handte R (1982). HOE 33171: A new selective herbicide for the control of annual and perennial warm climate grass weeds in broadleaf crops, In. Proc Brighton Crop Prot Conf-Weeds 1: 11-17. • Casas E, Bonilla E, Ducolomb Y, Betancourt M (2010). Differential effects of herbicides atrazine and fenoxapropethyl, and insecticides diazinon and malathion, on viability and maturation of porcine oocytes in vitro. Toxicol in Vitro 24 (1): 224-230. [CrossRef ] • Dorn E, Schmidt E, Rutz U, Kellner HM, Leist KH (1985). Metabolism in male and female rats after single and repeated oral administration, respectively of a low and a high dose. Hoechst-Roussel Agri-Vet Company, DPR, Pesticide Registration Library Doc. No. 51910-519031. • Extoxnet (1996). Fluazifop-p-butyl. Pesticide information profiles. Extension Toxicology Network. http://ace.orst. edu/info/extoxnet/ • Hay A (1981). Herbicide safety: Bill of health. Nature 289: 4-5. [CrossRef ] • Hongming L, Xu L, Zhaojian G, Fan Y, Dingbin C, Jianchun Z, Jianhong X, Shunpeng L, Qing H (2015). Isolation of an aryloxyphenoxy propanoate (AOPP) herbicide-degrading strain Rhodococcus ruber JPL-2 and the cloning of a novel carboxylesterase gene (feh). Braz J Microbiol 46 (2): 425- 432. [CrossRef ] • Horbowicz M, Sempruch C, Kosson R, Koczkodaj D, Walas D (2013). Effect of fluazifop-p-butyl treatment on pigments