Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2016 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

Long-Term Benefits of Percutaneous Anatomical Restoration of Vertebral Compression Fractures Linked to Malignancy

Pages
608–614
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: Anatomical restoration (i.e., cortical ring reduction with endplate rebalancing) is potentially beneficial for a wellselected group of patients with spine metastases and long life expectancies because this procedure avoids the complications typical of these types of treatments (e.g., leakage, adjacent fractures and re-collapse).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: To evaluate the efficacy, feasibility and safety of a percutaneous anatomical vertebral body reduction for the treatment of VCF (vertebral compression fracture) linked to malignancy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL and METHODS: The retrospective study examined 32 patients with osteolytic VCF due to malignant infiltration of the vertebral body.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: Anatomical restoration (i.e., cortical ring reduction with endplate rebalancing) is potentially beneficial for a wellselected group of patients with spine metastases and long life expectancies because this procedure avoids the complications typical of these types of treatments (e.g., leakage, adjacent fractures and re-collapse).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy, feasibility and safety of a percutaneous anatomical vertebral body reduction for the treatment of VCF (vertebral compression fracture) linked to malignancy. Vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty have played essential roles in the treatment of painful vertebral metastasis, although there are few reports with long survival that have evaluated the long-term efficacy, adjacent fractures and vertebral body (VB) re-collapse associated with these procedures. We aimed to evaluate the longterm efficacy and the complications associated with malignancy and changes in spinal biomechanics. MATERIAL and METHODS: The retrospective study examined 32 patients with osteolytic VCF due to malignant infiltration of the vertebral body. A visual analogue scale, the EQ5 and radiological analysis (i.e., X-ray and CT scan) were used to assess back pain, quality of life and complications. RESULTS: Statistically significant reductions in anterior and central vertebral body heights (6.2 mm-19.6 ± 4.2 mm- and 5.8 mm16.7 ± 7.8 mm-, respectively) that resulted in reductions of the regional Cobb angles exceeding 30% were observed. There was also a statistically significant improvement in quality of life. The average survival was longer than those reported in most published articles, and the average follow-up period was 30.9 months. CONCLUSION: Anatomical restoration (i.e., cortical ring reduction with endplate rebalancing) is potentially beneficial for a wellselected group of patients with spine metastases and long life expectancies because this procedure avoids the complications typical of these types of treatments (e.g., leakage, adjacent fractures and re-collapse).

🔖

Cite This Article

NORIEGA, D. C., KRÜGER, A., RAMAJO, R. H., ARDURA, F., MUNOZ, M., ŞAHİN, S. (2016). Long-Term Benefits of Percutaneous Anatomical Restoration of Vertebral Compression Fractures Linked to Malignancy. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 608–614. https://ajindex.com/articles/417819

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Aghayev K, Papanastassiou I, Frank Vrionis F: Role of vertebral augmentation procedures in the management of vertebral compression fractures in cancer patients.? Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care 5:222-226, 2011 2. Anderson SR: Vertebroplasty. Pain Pract 1:46-52, 2001 3. Barlogie B: Treatment of multiple myeloma. Blood 103:20-32, 2004 4. Bassem G: Feasibility, safety and cement leakage in vertebroplasty of osteoporotic and malignant compression fractures. Pain Phys 15:223-228, 2012 5. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, Wark JD, Mitchell P, Wriedt C, Graves S, Staples MP, Murphy B: A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 361:557-568, 2009 6. Chen KY, Ma HI, Chiang YH: Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate for pathological fracture of the spine. J Clin Neurosci 16:1300-1304, 2009 7. Coleman RE: Skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer 80 (Suppl 8):1588-1594, 1997 8. Cortet B, Cotten A, Boutry N, Dewatre F, Flipo RM, Duquesnoy B, Chastanet P, Delcambre B: Percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteolytic metastases or multiple myeloma. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 64:177-183, 1997 9. Dolan P, Luo J, Pollintine P, Landham PR, Stefanakis M, Adams MA: Intervertebral disc decompression following endplate damage. Spine 38(17):1473-1481, 2013 10. Dudeney S: Kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteolytic vertebral compression fractures as a result of multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 20:2382-2387, 2002 11. Eleraky M, Papanastassiou I, Setzer M, Baaj A, Tran N, Vrionis F: Balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of metastatic tumors of the upper thoracic spine. J Neurosurg Spine 14:372-376, 2011 12. Fourney DR, Schomer DF, Nader R, Chalan-Fourney J, Suki D, Ahrar K, Rhines LD, Gokaslan Z: Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients. J Neurosurg 98 Suppl 1: 21-30, 2003 13. Gaitanis IN, Hadjipavlou AG, Katonis PG, Tzermiadianos MN, Pasku DS, Patwardhan AG: Balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of pathological vertebral compressive fractures. Eur Spine J 14:250-260, 2005 14. Georgy BA: Vertebroplasty technique in metastatic disease. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 20:169-177, 2010 15. Gerszten PC, Monaco EA 3rd: Complete percutaneous treatment of vertebral body tumors causing spinal canal compromise using a transpedicular cavitation, cement augmentation, and radiosurgical technique. Neurosurg Focus 27:E9, 2009 16. Hargunani R,