Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2009 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Siyatik sinirin yüksek divizyon varyasyonları ve piriformis-siyatik sinir ilişkisi

Variations in the high division of the sciatic nerve and relationship between the sciatic nerve and the piriformis

Pages
139–144
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These variations require reviewing the piriformis syndrome.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The sciatic nerve (SN) separates into its branches, the tibial and common fibular nerves, outside the pelvis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, it may rarely be separated within the pelvis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These variations require reviewing the piriformis syndrome.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The sciatic nerve (SN) separates into its branches, the tibial and common fibular nerves, outside the pelvis. However, it may rarely be separated within the pelvis. In such cases, the tibial nerve and the common fibular nerve may leave the pelvis through different routes. These variations may cause nerve compressions under other anatomic structures, resulting in non-discogenic sciatica. The aim of this study was to define the level of the SN exit and of the SN division. MATERIAL and METHOD: 50 gluteal regions were examined in 25 formalin-fixed adult male cadavers. RESULTS: In 52% of the cases, the SN exited the pelvis as a whole nerve without any division, whereas in 48% a high division was observed. Branches of the SN left the pelvis through the infrapiriform foramen (IP) as two separate nerves In 24%. One branch of the SN left the pelvis through the IP and other through a different route in another 24%. CONCLUSION: The differences in the exit routes of these two nerves are important in clarifying the clinical etiology of nondiscogenic sciatica. These variations require reviewing the piriformis syndrome.

Özet

AMAÇ: Siyatik sinir (SS) çoğunlukla, pelvis dışında tibial (TS) ve common fibular (CFS) dallarına ayrılır. Ancak bazan pelvis içinde de dallara ayrılabilir. Bu durumlarda iki sinir farklı yollardan geçerek pelvisten çıkabilirler. Bu varyasyonlar, nondiskojenik siyatika ile sonuçlanan sinir basılarına neden olabilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, SS'nin farklı bölünme mesafelerini ve pelvisten çıkış varyasyonlarına dikkat çekmektir. GEREÇ-YÖNTEM: 25 formalin ile fikse erişkin erkek kadavranın 50 gluteal bölgesi disseke edilerek değerlendirildi. BULGULAR: SS, %52 oranında dallarına ayrılmadan bütün olarak çıkmakta, %48'inde ise yüksek bölünme göstermektedir. %24'ünde SS'nin ayrılmış dalları infrapiriform foramen (IP)'den geçerek pelvisten çıkarken diğer %24'ünde ise dallardan biri IP dışında farklı bir yoldan geçer. SONUÇ: SS'nin dallarının farklı yollardan geçerek pelvisten çıkması non-diskojenik siyatika klinik etiyolojisinin tanımlanmasında önem taşır. Bu varyasyonlar piriformis sendromunu değerlendirmek için gereklidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜVENÇER, M., İYEM, C., AKYER, Ş. P., TETİK, S., NADERİ, S. (2009). Siyatik sinirin yüksek divizyon varyasyonları ve piriformis-siyatik sinir ilişkisi. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 139–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/417785

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Arifoğlu Y, Sargon MF, Tanyeli E, Yazar F: Double superior gemellus together with double piriformis and high division of the sciatic nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 19: 407–408, 1997 2. Babinski MA, Machado FA, Costa WS: A rare variation in the high division of the sciatic nerve surrounding the superior gemellus muscle. Eur J of Morphol 41(1): 41–42, 2003 3. Barton PM: Piriformis syndrome: A rational approach to management. Pain 47: 345–352, 1991 4. Beaton LE, Anson BJ: The relation of the sciatic nerve and its subdivisions to the piriformis muscle. Anat Rec 70: 1–5, 1937 5. Beaton LE: The sciatic nerve and piriform muscle: Their interrelationa possible cause of coccgodynia. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 20: 686–688, 1938 6. Broadhurst NA, Simmons N, Bond MJ: Piriformis syndrome: Correlation of muscle morphology with symptoms and signs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85: 2036–2039, 2004 7. Chen WS: Bipartite piriformis muscle: An unusual cause of sciatic nerve entrapment. Pain 58: 269–272, 1994 8. Chiba S: Multiple positional relationships of nerves arising from the sacral plexus to the piriformis muscle in humans. Kaibogaku Zasshi 67(6): 691–724, 1992 9. Foster MR. Piriformis syndrome. Orthopedics 25(8): 821–825, 2002 10. Güvençer M, Akyer PŞ, İyem C, Tetik S, Naderi S: The topographic location and the relation of the piriformis muscle and the sciatic nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 30: 467–474, 2008 11. Kırıcı Y, Yazar F, Ozan H: The neurovascular and muscular anomalies of the gluteal region: an atypical pudendal nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 21(6): 393–396, 1999 12. Kırıcı Y, Ozan H: Double gluteus maximus muscle with associated variations in the gluteal region. Surg Radiol Anat 21(6): 397–400, 1999. 13. Kosukegawa I, Yoshimoto M, Isogai S, Nonaka S, Yamashita T: Piriformis syndrome resulting from a rare anatomic variation. Spine 31(18): 664–666, 2006 14. Machado FA, Babinski MA, Brasil FB, Favorito LA, Abidu-Figureiedo M, Costa MG: Anatomical variations between sciatic nerve and priform muscle during fetal period in human. Int J Morphol 21(1): 29–35, 2003 15. Mas N, Özekşi P, Özdemir B, Kapakin S, Sargon MF, Çelik HH, Yener N: A case of bilateral high division of the sciatic nerves, together with a unilateral unusual course of the tibial nerve. Neuroanatomy 2: 13–15, 2003 16. Moore KL, Dalley AF: Clinical Oriented Anatomy, 4th edition, Baltimore Lippincott Williams&Wilkins, 1999, 558 17. Ozaki S, Hamabe T, Muro T: Piriformis syndrome resulting from an anomalous relationship between the