Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2009 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Lomber istmik spondilolistesizde Laminanın yeniden yerleştirilmesi (Laminoplasty) cerrahisi: Bir prospektif klinik çalışma

Replacement of vertebral Lamina (Laminoplasty) in surgery for lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. A prospective clinical study

Pages
113–120
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the anterior fusion rate was 95%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: The use of lamina as a graft for fusion in isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis (LIS) is not known.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL and METHOD: Twenty cases that have been operated in our clinic due to G1 and G2 ISL between February 2003 and December 2006 were clinically and radiologically examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the anterior fusion rate was 95%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of lamina as a graft for fusion in isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis (LIS) is not known. In the present prospective clinical study, we used the laminoplasty technique and reported on its outcomes. MATERIAL and METHOD: Twenty cases that have been operated in our clinic due to G1 and G2 ISL between February 2003 and December 2006 were clinically and radiologically examined. The clinical assessment of the patients was carried out with the Prolo Economic and Functional scale. RESULTS: Both interbody fusion and laminoplasty procedures concerning 88 pedicles in total were performed on 20 cases of which 10 were at the L4-5 level, whereas 6 were at the L5-S1 level and 2 were at the L3-4-5 level. Five (25%) cases also had coexisting spinal stenosis. 19 (95%) patients had solid fusion but one (5%) had no solid fusion formation while having posterior fusion along with a clinical neurological examination result similar to the one obtained during the preoperative period. In conclusion, the anterior fusion rate was 95%. The most remarkable finding among the patients was the recovery observed at the 2nd month. The Prolo scale results of the cases were good and the follow-up time was 23.5 months. CONCLUSION: The laminoplasty technique is a method which presents advantages in isthmic spondylolisthesis cases such as short duration of operation, absence of graft donor site complications, preservation of the osteoligamentous structures of the posterior column and a high probability of achievement of fusion through only a posterior approach at a single session; therefore, we believe it is an alternative surgical technique.

Özet

AMAÇ: Lomber istmik spondilolistesizde (LİS) daha önce laminanın füzyon amaçlı yeniden kullanılması tekniği bilinmemektedir. Biz lomber laminoplasti tekniğini bu çalışmada uyguladık. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇ: Kliniğimizde Şubat 2003 - Aralık 2006 arasında opere edilen toplam Evre 1 ve 2 20 olgu prospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Olgular klinik ve radyolojik olarak incelenmiştir. Hastalar Prolo ekonomik ve fonksiyonel skala ile inceleme altına alınmıştır. BULGULAR: Hem cisimler arası füzyon hemde laminoplasti işlemi ile totalde 88 pedikül içeren 20 olgu opere edilmiştir ki bunların 10 tanesi L4-5 seviyesi, 6'si L5-S1, ve 2'de L3-4-5 seviyesi idi. 5 olguya (%25) spinal stenosis eşlik ediyordu. 19 olguda (% 95) solid füzyon oluşmuştu, bir olguda (%5) posterior füzyon oluşumu varken cisimler arası füzyon oluşmamıştı ama nörolojik muayenesinde postoperatif dönemle aynı idi. Sonuçta füzyon oranı %95 idi. En dikkati çeken bulgu, olguların 2. ayda şikayetlerinin tamamının düzelmiş olması idi. Prolo skalasının sonucu da iyi bulundu ve olgular toplam 23.5 ay izlendiler. SONUÇ: Posterior osseoligamentöz yapıları korunması, nöral dokuların korunması,tek seansta cerrahinin bitmesi,greft için dönor saha gerekmemesi, kısa operasyon süresi ve yüksek füzyon oranı ile istmik lomber spondilolistesiz tedavisinde laminoplasti tekniği alternatif cerrahi tekniktir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOTİL, K., AKÇETİN, M., TARI, R., TON, T., BİLGE, T. (2009). Lomber istmik spondilolistesizde Laminanın yeniden yerleştirilmesi (Laminoplasty) cerrahisi: Bir prospektif klinik çalışma. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 113–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/417784

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Antoniades SB, Hammerberg KW, DeWald RL: Sagittal plane configuration of the sacrum in spondylolisthesis. Spine 25: 1085-1091, 2001 2. Bednar DA: Surgical management of lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis via posterior reduction with minimal laminectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 5(2):105-109, 2002 3. Benini A, Plotz G: Reduction and stabilization without laminectomy for unstable degenerative spondylolisthesis: a preliminary report. Neurosurgery 37(4):843-844,1995 4. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Eisenberg BA, Baldus CR, Lenke LG: Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion. Spine 15
  2. 24(16):1721-1727, 1999 5. Cabukoglu C, Guven O, Yildirim Y, Kara H, Ramadan SS: Effect of sagittal plane deformity of the lumbar spine on epidural fibrosis formation after laminectomy: an experimental study in the rat. Spine 15
  3. 29(20):2242-2247, 2004 6. Csécsei GI, Klekner AP, Dobai J, Lajgut A, Sikula J: Posterior interbody fusion using laminectomy bone and transpedicular screw fixation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Surg Neurol 53(1):2-6, 2000 7. Deguchi M, Rapoff AJ, Zdeblick TA: Posterolateral fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: Analysis of fusion rate and clinical results. J Spinal Disord 11(6):459-464, 1998 8. Dimar JR, Glassman SD, Burkus KJ, Carreon LY: Clinical outcomes and fusion success at 2 years of single-level instrumented posterolateral fusions with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2/compression resistant matrix versus iliac crest bone graft. Spine15
  4. 31(22):2534-2539, 2006 9. Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN. Brower R, Montgomery DM: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: A prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine 22(24):2807-2812, 1997 10. Fraser RD: Interbody posterior and combined lumbar fusion. Spine 20: 167-177, 1995 11. Gibson S, McLeod I, Wardlaw D, Urbaniak S: Allograft versus autograft in instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized control trial. Spine 1
  5. 27(15):1599-1603, 2002 12. Gill GG: Long-term follow-up evaluation of a few patients with spondylolisthesis treated by excision of the loose lamina with decompression of the nerve roots without spinal fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 182:215-219,1984 13. Harvey CJ, Richenberg JL, Saifuddin A, Wolman RL: The radiological investigation of lumbar spondy