Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2016 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5

Embolization with Gamma Knife Radiosurgery of Giant Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations

Pages
709–713
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Repeated Gamma Knife radiosurgery should be a treatment option when there is a small nidus remnant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: Giant arteriovenous malformations (i.e., those greater than 6 cm maximum diameter or volume > 33 cc) are difficult to treat and often carry higher treatment morbidity and mortality rates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In our study, we reviewed the angiographic results and clinical outcomes for 11 patients with giant arteriovenous malformations who were treated between 1994 and 2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Repeated Gamma Knife radiosurgery should be a treatment option when there is a small nidus remnant.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: Giant arteriovenous malformations (i.e., those greater than 6 cm maximum diameter or volume > 33 cc) are difficult to treat and often carry higher treatment morbidity and mortality rates. In our study, we reviewed the angiographic results and clinical outcomes for 11 patients with giant arteriovenous malformations who were treated between 1994 and 2012. MATERIAL and METhODS: The patients selected included 9 males (82%) and 2 females (18%). Their presenting symptoms were hemorrhage (n=2; 18%), seizure (n=7; 64%), and headache (n=2; 12%). Nine patients were Spetzler-Martin Grade III, 2 were Spetzler-Martin Grade IV. The mean arteriovenous malformation volume was 41 cc (33-52 cc). The mean age of the patients was 45.1 years (24-57 years) and the mean radiation dose delivered to the margin of the nidus was 14.2 Gy. RESULTS: Ten patients received pre-Gamma Knife radiosurgery embolization and Gamma Knife radiosurgery, 1 patient received pre-Gamma Knife radiosurgery embolization and Gamma Knife radiosurgery twice and the interval between Gamma Knife radiosurgeries was 3 months. The complete obliteration rate following Gamma Knife radiosurgery was 36%, subtotal obliteration (> 70% decreased size of nidus) was 36%, and partial obliteration was 28%. One patient experienced a small hemorrhage after embolization. CONCLUSION: Combined embolization and Gamma Knife radiosurgery showed successful obliteration of the arteriovenous malformation nidus. The use of embolization to initially reduce nidus size followed by Gamma Knife radiosurgery improves the treatment results. Repeated Gamma Knife radiosurgery should be a treatment option when there is a small nidus remnant.

🔖

Cite This Article

CHUN, D. H., KIM, M. S., KİM, S. T., PAENG, S. H., JEONG, H. W., LEE, W. H. (2016). Embolization with Gamma Knife Radiosurgery of Giant Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5, 709–713. https://ajindex.com/articles/417689

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Andrade-Souza YM, Ramani M, Scora D, Tsao MN, terBrugge K, Schwartz ML: Embolization before radiosurgery reduces the obliteration rate of arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 60:443-451, 2007 2. Anson JA, Spetzler RF: Giant arteriovenous malformations. In: Carter LP, Spetzler RF, Hamilton MG (eds), Neurovascular Surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995:1017-1028 3. Blackburn SL, Ashley WW, Rich KM, Simpson JR, Drzymala RE, Ray WZ, Moran CJ, Cross III DT, Chicoine MR, Dacey Jr RG: Combined endovascular embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of large arteriovenous malformations: Clinical article. J Neurosurg 114:1758-1767, 2011 4. Chang SD, Marcellus ML, Marks MP, Levy RP, Do HM, Steinberg GK: Multimodality treatment of giant intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 53(1):1-13, 2003 5. Connors JJ, Wojak JC: Interventional Neuroradiology: Strategies and Practical Techniques. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1999 6. Dalyai R, Theofanis T, Starke RM, Chalouhi N, Ghobrial G, Jabbour P, Dumont A, Fernando GL, Gordon DS, Rosenwasser RH: Stereotactic radiosurgery with neoadjuvant embolization of large arteriovenous malformations: An institutional experience. BioMed Res Int 2014:1-8, 2014 7. Debrun GM, Aletch V, Ausman JI, Charbel F, Dujovny M: Embolization of the nidus of brain arteriovenous malformations with n-butyl cyanoacrylate. Neurosurgery 40:112-120, 1997 8. Deruty R, Pelissou-Buyotat I, Amat D, Mottolese C, Bascoulergue Y, Turjman F, Gerard JP: Complications after multidisciplinary treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 138:119-131, 1996 9. Drake CG. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Considerations for and experience with surgical treatment in 166 cases. Clin Neurosurg 26:145-208, 1979 10. Firlik AD, Levy EI, Kondziolka D, Yonas H: Staged volume radiosurgery followed by microsurgical resection: A novel treatment for giant cerebral arteriovenous malformationsTechnical case report. Neurosurgery 43:1223-1228, 1998 11. Fleetwood IG, Marcellus M, Levy RP, Marks MP, Steinberg GK: Deep arteriovenous malformations of the basal ganglia and thalamus: Natural history. J Neurosurg 98:747-750, 2003 12. Fournier D, terBrugge KG, Willinsky R, Lasjaunias P, Montanera W: Endovascular treatment of intracerebral arteriovenous malformations; experience in 49 cases. J Neurosurg 75:228- 233, 1991 13. Frizzel RT, Fisher WS: Cure, morbidity, and mortality associated with embolization of brain arteriovenous