Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

Parenchymal Pressure Inconsistency in Different Brain Areas After Kaolin Injection into the Subarachnoid Space of Neonatal Rats

Pages
142–148
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The present comments on the occurrence and pathogenesis of hydrocephalus are still open to debate and may require further comprehensive studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIm: To describe the relationship between the parenchymal pressure changes and the development of hydrocephalus in kaolininjected neonatal rats according to cerebral regions and time intervals of developing hydrocephalus. mATERIAl and mEThODS: Neonatal rats aged 2 to 3 days were examined in 5 groups as kaolin frontal "K-F", kaolin parietal "KP", saline frontal "SF-F", saline parietal "SF-P" and control "C", based on the injected material and injection sites.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On the 3rd, 7th, 15th, 30th and 60th days after injection, parenchymal pressures (PP) of 5-7 rats from each group were measured from different regions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The present comments on the occurrence and pathogenesis of hydrocephalus are still open to debate and may require further comprehensive studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIm: To describe the relationship between the parenchymal pressure changes and the development of hydrocephalus in kaolininjected neonatal rats according to cerebral regions and time intervals of developing hydrocephalus. mATERIAl and mEThODS: Neonatal rats aged 2 to 3 days were examined in 5 groups as kaolin frontal "K-F", kaolin parietal "KP", saline frontal "SF-F", saline parietal "SF-P" and control "C", based on the injected material and injection sites. All injections were performed into the cortical subarachnoid space of the right frontal and right parietal regions. The fifth group was injection free. On the 3rd, 7th, 15th, 30th and 60th days after injection, parenchymal pressures (PP) of 5-7 rats from each group were measured from different regions. RESulTS: We compared the control group with saline-injected and kaolin-injected groups and found statistically significant parenchymal pressure differences based on regional measurements. In the kaolin groups, the mean PP values were obviously higher than the saline-injected group. Within each kaolin-injected group, the pressure values were variable and inconsistent regarding the parenchymal regions. CONCluSION: Hydrocephalus cannot be totally explained with existent 'bulk-flow' or 'hydrodynamic' theories. Although our experimental design was planned to develop hydrocephalus according to the bulk flow theory, our results were more compatible with the hydrodynamic theory. The present comments on the occurrence and pathogenesis of hydrocephalus are still open to debate and may require further comprehensive studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

VURAL, M., COŞAN, T. E., UZUNER, K., ERKASAP, N., COŞAN, D. T., BAL, C. (2018). Parenchymal Pressure Inconsistency in Different Brain Areas After Kaolin Injection into the Subarachnoid Space of Neonatal Rats. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 142–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/417676

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Anile C, De Bonis P, Di Chirico A, Ficola A, Mangiola A, Petrella G: Cerebral blood flow autoregulation during intracranial hypertension: A simple, purely hydraulic mechanism? Childs Nerv Syst 25(3):325-335, 2009 2. Braun KP, Dijkhuizen RM, De Graaf RA, Nicolay K, Vandertop WP, Gooskens RH, Tulleken KA: Cerebral ischemia and white matter edema in experimental hydrocephalus: A combined MRI and MRS study. Brain Res 757:295-298, 1997 3. Carmelo A, Ficola A, Fravolini ML, La Cava M, Maira G, Mangiola A: ICP and CBF regulation: A new hypothesis to explain the "windkessel" phenomenon. Acta Neurochir Suppl 81: 109-111, 2002 4. Cavaglia M, Dombrowski SM, Drazba J, Vasanji A, Bokesch PM, Janigro D: Regional variation in brain capillary density and vascular response to ischemia. Brain Res 910(1-2):81-93, 2001 5. Chan GS, Ainslie PN, Willie CK, Taylor CE, Atkinson G, Jones H, Lovell NH, Tzeng YC: Contribution of arterial Windkessel in low-frequency cerebral hemodynamics during transient changes in blood pressure. J Appl Physiol 110(4):917-925, 2011 6. Cosan TE, Gucuyener D, Dundar E, Arslantas A, Vural M, Uzuner K, Tel E: Cerebral blood flow alterations in progressive communicating hydrocephalus: Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography assessment in an experimental model. J Neurosurg 94(2):265-269, 2001 7. Cosan TE, Guner AI, Akcar N, Uzuner K, Tel E: Progressive ventricular enlargement in the absence of high ventricular pressure in an experimental neonatal rat model. Childs Nerv Syst 18(1-2):10-14, 2002 8. Da Silva MC, Michowicz S, Drake JM, Chumas PD, Tuor UI: Reduced local cerebral blood flow in periventricular white matter in experimental neonatal hydrocephalus restoration with CSF shunt. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 15: 1057-1065, 1995 9. Daniel GB, Edwards DF, Harvey RC, Kabalka GW: Communicating hydrocephalus in dogs with congenital ciliary dysfunction. Dev Neurosci 17(4):230-235, 1995 10. Del Bigio MR, Vriend JP: Monoamine neurotransmitters and amino acids in the cerebrum and striatum of immature rats with kaolin-induced hydrocephalus. Brain Res 798(1-2):119- 126, 1998 11. Egnor M, Zheng L, Rosiello A, Gutman F, Davis R: A model of pulsations in communicating hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 36:281-303, 2002 12. Greitz D: The hydrodynamic hypothesis versus the bulk flow hypothesis. Neurosurg Rev 27(4):299-300, 2004 13. Hochwald GM, Nakamura S, Camins MB: The rat in experimental obstructive hydrocephalus. Kinderchir 34:403- 410, 1981 14. Idris Z, Mustapha M, Abdul