Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5

Course of Aggressive Somatotroph, Corticotroph and Mammotroph Tumors under Temozolomide: Report of Three Cases and Review of the Literature

Pages
826–838
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A review of the literature demonstrated 67.3%, 60% and 26.7% overall response rates to TMZ treatment inprolactinoma, corticotropinoma and somatostatinoma cases, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Treatment of aggressive pituitary tumors may be challenging.
📊
Key Findings & Data:TMZ with a schedule of 150–200 mg/m2 for 5 days every 28 days was administered to all patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A review of the literature demonstrated 67.3%, 60% and 26.7% overall response rates to TMZ treatment inprolactinoma, corticotropinoma and somatostatinoma cases, respectively.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Treatment of aggressive pituitary tumors may be challenging. Temozolomide (TMZ) is a promising agent when conventional treatmentmethods fail. We present three patients with aggressive pituitary tumors with atypical morphology, who were resistant to conventionaltreatments and treated with TMZ. The first case had a somatotroph adenoma, the second a corticotroph adenoma, and the third amacroprolactinoma. We also reviewed the literature reporting TMZ efficacy in somatotroph, corticotroph and mammotroph tumorsof the pituitary gland. TMZ with a schedule of 150–200 mg/m2 for 5 days every 28 days was administered to all patients. Eventhough only the case of macroprolactinoma had a favorable response to TMZ treatment among our patients, both radiologicaland hormonal recurrence occurred 30 months after the cessation of TMZ treatment. TMZ treatment was then administered again.Cases of somatotroph and corticotroph adenomas had progressed under TMZ treatment and the patients were lost due to masseffect of the tumor. A review of the literature demonstrated 67.3%, 60% and 26.7% overall response rates to TMZ treatment inprolactinoma, corticotropinoma and somatostatinoma cases, respectively. There is still a need to define response criteria uniformlyto TMZ treatment in aggressive pituitary tumors. The duration of response should be reported for reliable evaluation of results.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDOĞAN, B. İ., ÜNLÜTÜRK, U., EMRAL, R., GÜLLÜ, S. (2018). Course of Aggressive Somatotroph, Corticotroph and Mammotroph Tumors under Temozolomide: Report of Three Cases and Review of the Literature. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5, 826–838. https://ajindex.com/articles/417660

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Al-Shraim M, Asa SL: The 2004 World Health Organization classification of pituitary tumors: What is new? Acta Neuropathol 111:1-7, 2006
  2. Annamalai AK, Dean AF, Kandasamy N, Kovacs K, Burton H, Halsall DJ, Shaw AS, Antoun NM, Cheow HK, Kirollos RW, Pickard JD, Simpson HL, Jefferies SJ, Burnet NG, Gurnell M: Temozolomide responsiveness in aggressive corticotroph tumours: A case report and review of the literature. Pituitary 15:276-287, 2012
  3. Arnold PM, Ratnasingam D, O’Neil MF, Johnson PL: Pituitary carcinoma recurrent to the lumbar intradural extramedullary space: Case report. J Spinal Cord Med 35:118-121, 2012
  4. Asimakopoulou A, Tzanela M, Koletti A, Kontogeorgos G, Tsagarakis S: Long-term remission in an aggressive Crooke cell adenoma of the pituitary, 18 months after discontinuation of treatment with temozolomide. Clin Case Rep 2:1-3, 2014
  5. Baker SD, Wirth M, Statkevich P, Reidenberg P, Alton K, Sartorius SE, Dugan M, Cutler D, Batra V, Grochow LB, Donehower RC, Rowinsky EK: Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of 14C-temozolomide following oral administration to patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res 5:309-317, 1999
  6. Batisse M, Raverot G, Maqdasy S, Durando X, Sturm N, Montoriol PF, Kemeny JL, Chazal J, Trouillas J, Tauveron I: Aggressive silent GH pituitary tumor resistant to multiple treatments, including temozolomide. Cancer Invest 31:190- 196, 2013
  7. Bengtsson D, Schroder HD, Andersen M, Maiter D, Berinder K, Feldt Rasmussen U, Rasmussen AK, Johannsson G, Hoybye C, van der Lely AJ, Petersson M, Ragnarsson O, Burman P: Long-term outcome and MGMT as a predictive marker in 24 patients with atypical pituitary adenomas and pituitary carcinomas given treatment with temozolomide. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100:1689-1698, 2015
  8. Besser GM, Burman P, Daly AF: Predictors and rates of treatment-resistant tumor growth in acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 153:187-193, 2005
  9. Biller BM, Grossman AB, Stewart PM, Melmed S, Bertagna X, Bertherat J, Buchfelder M, Colao A, Hermus AR, Hofland LJ, Klibanski A, Lacroix A, Lindsay JR, Newell-Price J, Nieman LK, Petersenn S, Sonino N, Stalla GK, Swearingen B, Vance ML, Wass JA, Boscaro M: Treatment of adrenocorticotropindependent Cushing’s syndrome: A consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:2454-2462, 2008
  10. Blevins LS Jr, Christy JH, Khajavi M, Tindall GT: Outcomes of therapy for Cushing’s disease due to adrenocorticotropinsecreting pituitary macroadenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:63-67, 1998
  11. Bode H, Seiz M, Lammert A, Broc