Journals / Acta Medica / 2021 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4

An Evaluation of Information Sources Regarding Drug Use and/or Poisoning Cases of Community Pharmacists in Ankara, Turkey

Pages
309–318
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To equip community pharmacists properly, authorities, professional institutions, and universities need to contribute to the process in different ways together with pharmacists being aware of their responsibilities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Exploring and categorizing the drug and/or poisoning information resources available in community pharmacies in Ankara according to some variables, and revealing common opinions regarding the future of the profession and information resources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It had four headings on the pharmacists’ demographics, their general information resources, specific resources in specific topics, and 4 suggestions regarding the future of pharmacy and drug information resources.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To equip community pharmacists properly, authorities, professional institutions, and universities need to contribute to the process in different ways together with pharmacists being aware of their responsibilities.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Exploring and categorizing the drug and/or poisoning information resources available in community pharmacies in Ankara according to some variables, and revealing common opinions regarding the future of the profession and information resources. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted as an online questionnaire for community pharmacists in Ankara. It had four headings on the pharmacists’ demographics, their general information resources, specific resources in specific topics, and 4 suggestions regarding the future of pharmacy and drug information resources. Results: The number of participants was 134 as 17.9% of 746 e-mail addresses. Mean ages±standart deviation were 40.9±12.0 years. The top 3 information sources on poisonings were the internet, colleagues, and physicians with 74.6%, 43.3%, and 30.6%, respectively. Participants in the “colleagues” group in terms of poisoning preferences had a shorter period after graduation (p=0.001). In the drug information inquiries package inserts, internet and colleagues were preferred mostly, with 69.4%, 63.4%, and 35.8%, respectively. Age groups and graduation years were statistically different regarding the “package inserts” and “colleagues” groups (p=0.012 and p=0.001, and p=0.019 and p<0.001, respectively). The most “totally agreed” suggestion was accepting the pharmacies’ being important drug and/or poison information resources for consumers with 68.7%. Conclusion: The pharmacists have been fulfilling their duty of “being an information resource” through rather limited resources. To equip community pharmacists properly, authorities, professional institutions, and universities need to contribute to the process in different ways together with pharmacists being aware of their responsibilities.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİKER, A., KARA, E., KARAHAN, S. (2021). An Evaluation of Information Sources Regarding Drug Use and/or Poisoning Cases of Community Pharmacists in Ankara, Turkey. Acta Medica, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4, 309–318. https://ajindex.com/articles/417588

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Carter BL. Evolution of Clinical Pharmacy in the USA and Future Directions for Patient Care. Drugs Aging. 2016 Mar;33(3):169-77
  2. Kostagiolas PA, Bairaktaris KD, Niakas D. An information behaviour investigation of the community pharmacists in Greece for developing library and information services. Health Info Libr J. 2010 Mar;27(1):46-56
  3. Iwanowicz SL, Marciniak MW, Zeolla MM. Obtaining and providing health information in the community pharmacy setting. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Jun 15;70(3):57
  4. Resmi Gazete: 6308 sayılı Eczacılar Ve Eczaneler Hakkında Kanun İle Uyuşturucu Maddelerin Murakabesi Hakkında Kanunda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun. 2012; Sept 2020 http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/ eskiler/2012/05/20120531-3.htm [5] Rae CE, Rappaport HM, Mahajan P. Drug information sources used by community pharmacists in Louisiana: a preliminary study. J Pharm Technol. 1992 Jan-Feb;8(1):30-3
  5. Ghaibi S, Ipema H, Gabay M; American Society of Health System Pharmacists. ASHP guidelines on the pharmacist’s role in providing drug information. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Apr 1;72(7):573-7
  6. Whitehead P, Atkin P, Krass I, et al. Patient drug information and consumer choice of pharmacy. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 1999 7(2): 71-79
  7. Nair K, Dolovich L, Cassels A, et al. What patients want to know about their medications. Focus group study of patient and clinician perspectives. Can Fam Physician. 2002 Jan;48:104-10
  8. Burghle A, Abrahamsen B, Lundby C, et al. Customers’ information seeking behavior prior to community pharmacy visits: A community pharmacy survey. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Oct;16(10):1442-1446
  9. Jeetu G, Girish T. Prescription drug labeling medication errors: a big deal for pharmacists. J Young Pharm. 2010 Jan;2(1):107-11
  10. Wazaify M, Maani M, Ball D. Drug information resources at community pharmacies in Amman, Jordan. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009 Jun;17(3):151-5
  11. Asmelashe Gelayee D, Binega Mekonnen G, Birarra MK. The Needs and Resources of Drug Information at Community Pharmacies in Gondar Town, Northwest Ethiopia. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8310636
  12. Udezi WA, Oparah AC, Enyi KU. An Investigation of Drug Information Needs of Nigerian Pharmacists. Drug Information Journal. 2007;41(4):471-479
  13. Yusuf H, Abdu-Aguye SN, Suleiman HO, et al. Utilization of electronic drug information resources by pharmacists practicing in hospital and community settings in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Journal of Pharmaceutical and