Journals / Acta Medica / 2021 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4

Conventional Synthetic Dmards in Psoriatic Arthritis: Changing Practice in Biologic Era; Real-Life Results from HURBIO-PsA Registry

Pages
296–302
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall prescription of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs at first and last follow-up visit were compared.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Psoriatic arthritis is a chronic musculoskeletal disorder which may affect skin, joints, bone and enthesis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Psoriatic arthritis patients who received at least 1 dose of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, using at least 1 conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (methotrexate, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine) at the time of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs starting visit and registered in the Hacettepe University BIOlogical Database- Psoriatic Arthritis were included in this retrospective longitudinal analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall prescription of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs at first and last follow-up visit were compared.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: Psoriatic arthritis is a chronic musculoskeletal disorder which may affect skin, joints, bone and enthesis. Conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs are first-line treatment options and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs are recommended in psoriatic arthritis patients who are intolerant/not controlled well with conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Although survival data of the conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs without concomitant biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs are available, the effect of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on the retention of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs is still a question of interest. Materials and Methods: Psoriatic arthritis patients who received at least 1 dose of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, using at least 1 conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (methotrexate, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine) at the time of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs starting visit and registered in the Hacettepe University BIOlogical Database- Psoriatic Arthritis were included in this retrospective longitudinal analysis. Demographic and disease-specific data at first and last followup visit were collected. Unadjusted retention rate of each conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs was assessed. Overall prescription of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs at first and last follow-up visit were compared. Results: A total of 266 (191(71.8%) female) patients was included. Median follow-up duration under biologic treatment was 43.4 (19.4- 80.1) months. Median retention duration of each conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were similar. Between the first and last visit; there was a 29.3% decrease in methotrexate use (61.7% vs. 43.6%; p<0.001), 8.4% decrease in leflunomide use (31.2% vs. 28.6%; p=0.30), 30.0% decrease in sulfasalazine use (11.3% vs. 7.9%; p=0.05), 31.1% decrease in hydroxychloroquine use (16.9% vs. 11.7%; p=0.001), 12.5 % decrease in glucocorticoids use (51.1% vs. 44.7%; p=0.015). At last visit, 59 (22.2%) patients were conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs -free: 20 (7.5%) patients were using only glucocorticoids, 39 (14.7%) patients were conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs + glucocorticoid-free. Conclusion: Although conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs were significantly discontinued in an important percent of patients after the initiation of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, percentage of patients using glucocorticoids at last visit was still high. Studies aiming to demonstrate when, in whom and how to discontinue conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs are needed.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİN, E., KALYONCU, U. (2021). Conventional Synthetic Dmards in Psoriatic Arthritis: Changing Practice in Biologic Era; Real-Life Results from HURBIO-PsA Registry. Acta Medica, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4, 296–302. https://ajindex.com/articles/417586

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Gladman DD, Antoni C, Mease P et al. Psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64 (Suppl 2): ii14-17
  2. Coates LC, Corp N, van der Windt DA et al. GRAPPA Treatment Recommendations: An Update From the 2020 GRAPPA Annual Meeting. J Rheumatol 2021; jrheum.201681
  3. Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79(6):700-12
  4. Kalyoncu U, Bayindir O, Ferhat Oksuz M et al. The Psoriatic Arthritis Registry of Turkey: results of a multicentre registry on 1081 patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017; 56(2):279- 86
  5. Jacobs ME, Pouw JN, Welsing P et al. First-line csDMARD monotherapy drug retention in psoriatic arthritis: methotrexate outperforms sulfasalazine. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60(2):780-84
  6. Xie Y, Liu Y, Liu Y. Are biologics combined with methotrexate better than biologics monotherapy in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dermatol Ther 2021:e14926
  7. Wilsdon TD, Whittle SL, Thynne TR et al.Methotrexate for psoriatic arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 1:CD012722
  8. Landi M, Zaffarana CA, Cerda O et al. Methotrexate and leflunomide survival in patients with psoriatic arthritis. International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology 2018; 13(2):102-07
  9. Lie E, van der Heijde D, Uhlig T et al. Effectiveness and retention rates of methotrexate in psoriatic arthritis in comparison with methotrexate-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69(4):671-76
  10. Kaltwasser JP, Nash P, Gladman D et al. Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis Study G: Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50(6):1939-50
  11. Malesci D, Tirri R, Buono R et al. Leflunomide in psoriatic arthritis: a retrospective study of discontinuation rate in daily clinical practice compared with methotrexate. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2007; 25(6):881-4
  12. Luzar MJ. Hydroxychloroquine in psoriatic arthropathy: exacerbations of psoriatic skin lesions. J Rheumatol 1982; 9(3):462-4
  13. Karmacharya P, Ogdie A, Eder L. Psoriatic arthritis and the association with cardiometabolic disease: a narrative review. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2021; 13:1759720X21998279.