Journals / İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 2

The correlation between botanical source and the biologically active compounds of propolis

Pages
81–87
Publication Date
2019-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results; the balsamic contents of the propolis samples ranged between 59.97 and 83.31%, total phenolic contents were ranged between 27.56±0.05 and 171.93±0.28 mgGAE/g.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:DOI: 10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2019.435408In this research, five propolis samples collected from Turkey were investigated to observe the correlation between botanical sources and chemical contents of the samples and in this way emphasize the influence of botanical sources of propolis on its chemical characterization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the microscopic analysis results; two samples that were collected from Rize (P1 and P2), were characterized as most probably being chesnut propolis; while one sample collected from Tekirdağ (P3) was evaluated as being a mixed type, in the other Tekirdağ sample (P4), the pollens belonging to the taxa of the Brassicaceae family were found as dominant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results; the balsamic contents of the propolis samples ranged between 59.97 and 83.31%, total phenolic contents were ranged between 27.56±0.05 and 171.93±0.28 mgGAE/g.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 · 1 sample
⚙️Variables:Propolis · chestnut · microscopic

Abstract

DOI: 10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2019.435408In this research, five propolis samples collected from Turkey were investigated to observe the correlation between botanical sources and chemical contents of the samples and in this way emphasize the influence of botanical sources of propolis on its chemical characterization. As a first step, to determine the botanical sources of the samples, microscopic analysis was performed. According to the microscopic analysis results; two samples that were collected from Rize (P1 and P2), were characterized as most probably being chesnut propolis; while one sample collected from Tekirdağ (P3) was evaluated as being a mixed type, in the other Tekirdağ sample (P4), the pollens belonging to the taxa of the Brassicaceae family were found as dominant. The sample collected from Sivas (P5); was also recognized as mixed type. The second step of the research was the chemical analyses of the propolis samples. According to the results; the balsamic contents of the propolis samples ranged between 59.97 and 83.31%, total phenolic contents were ranged between 27.56±0.05 and 171.93±0.28 mgGAE/g. The minimum flavone and flavonol content of 0.28±0.01% was found in the P1 sample described as chesnut propolis and colected from Rize. The maximum value 5.1±0.07% was found in the P4 sample as was total phenolic content. Flavanones and Dihydroflavonols contents varied between 6.58±0.009-12.94±0.007%. According to the GC-MS results the investigated samples contained compounds belonging to the various groups. With regard to the Excel correllation, the balsamic content showed a negative correlation with total phenolic content, flavone and flavonol content, flavanones and dihydroflavonols content.Cite this article as: Gençay Çelemli Ö, Atakay M, Sorkun K (2019). The correlation between botanical source and the biologically active compounds of propolis. Istanbul J Pharm 49 (2): 81-87.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELEMLİ, Ö. G., ATAKAY, M., SORKUN, K. (2019). The correlation between botanical source and the biologically active compounds of propolis. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 2, 81–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/41757

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahn MR, Kumazawa S, Usui Y, Nakamura M, Matsuka M, Zhu F, Nakayama T (2007). Antioxidant activity and constituents of propolis collected in various areas of China. Food Chem 101: 1383-1392.
  2. Barth OM (1998). Pollen analysis of Brazilian propolis. Grana 37: 97-101.
  3. Bonvehi JS, Coll FV, Jorda RE (1994). The composition, active components and bacteriostatic activity of propolis in dietetics. J American Oil Chemists’ Society 71: 529-532.
  4. Burdock GA (1998). Review of the Biologşcal Properties and Toxicity of Nee Propolis (propolis). Food Chem Toxicol 36: 347-363.
  5. Chen CN, Weng MS, Wu CL, Lin JK (2004). Comparison of Radical Scavenging Activity, Cytotoxic Effects and Apoptosis Induction in Human Melanoma Cells by Taiwanese Propolis From Different Sources. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 1: 175-185.
  6. Choi YM, Noh DO, Cho SY, Suh HJ, K.m KM, Kim JM (2006). Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of propolis from several regions of Korea. Food Sci Technol 39: 756-761.
  7. Choi SJ, Shimomura K, Kumazawa S, Ahn MR (2013). Antioxidant properties and phenolic composition of propolis from diverse geographic regions in Korea. Food Sci Technol Res 19: 211-222.
  8. Cottica SM, Sawaya ACHHF, Eberlin MN, Franco SLF, Zeoula LM, Visentainer JV (2011). Antioxidant activity and Composition of propolis obtained by different method of extraction. J Braz Chem Soc 22: 929-935.
  9. Cunha IBS, Sawaya ACHF, Caetano FB, Shimizu MT, Marcucci MC, Drezza FT, Povia GS, Carvalho PO (2004). Factors that influence the yield and composition of Brazilian Propolis Extracts. J Braz Chem Soc 15: 964-970.
  10. Çelemli ÖG, Sorkun K (2012). The plant choices of Honey Bees to Collect Propolis İn Tekirdağ-Turkey. Hacettepe J Biol Chem 40: 45-51.
  11. Daleprane JB, Abdalla D S (2013). Emerging Roles of Propolis: Antioxidant, Cardioprotective, and Antiangiogenic Actions. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med doi: 10.1155/2013/175135. E. Gençay, Ö (2004). Identification of Botanical Origin and Chemical Composition of Propolis From Kemaliye-Erzincan Region. Master Thesis. Gençay Ö, Salih B (2008). GC-MS Analysis of Propolis Samples From Different Regions of Turkey, Four Different Regions of Brazil and One From Japan. Mellifera 9: 19-28.
  12. Ghisalberti EL (1979). Propolis: a review. Bee World 60: 59-84. Gómez-Caravaca AM, Gómez-Romero M, Arráez-Román D, Segura-Carretero A, Fernández-Gutiérrez A (2006). Advances in the analysis of phenolic compounds in products derived from bees. J Pharm Biomed Anal 41: 1220-1234.
  13. Gülçin İ, Bursal E,