Journals / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation / 2022 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 3

The Relationship of Comorbidities with Intensive Care Unit Admission and Mortality in Patients with COVID-19

Pages
187–193
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Those with a Charlson Comorbidity Index score greater than 5.5 could be more associated with negative outcomes and mortality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Comorbid conditions are known to be associated with poor prognosis in coronavirus disease 2019.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 150 patients who presented to the emergency department of our hospital with various complaints and symptoms were diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 as a result of the testing and received inpatient treatment (87 males, mean age 61.6 ± 13.8 years) were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Those with a Charlson Comorbidity Index score greater than 5.5 could be more associated with negative outcomes and mortality.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Comorbid conditions are known to be associated with poor prognosis in coronavirus disease 2019. This study aimed to investigate the effects of comorbidity burdens of inpatients, identified by the Charlson Comorbidity Index, on their mortalities. Methods: A total of 150 patients who presented to the emergency department of our hospital with various complaints and symptoms were diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 as a result of the testing and received inpatient treatment (87 males, mean age 61.6 ± 13.8 years) were included in the study. Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were calculated. Patients were classified into 2 groups based on the state of exitus: group 1, those who did not survive; 33 patients, 19 males; 68.3 ± 11.8 years and group 2, those who survived; 117 patients, 68 males; 59.7 ± 13.8 years. Results: In all patients, the exitus rate was 22%, the rate of intensive care follow-up was 46%, and the intubation rate was 37.3%. The Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2. Multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that the Charlson Comorbidity Index score was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 1.990, 95% CI: 1.314-3.015, P =.001). The cut-off value for the Charlson Comorbidity Index to predict in-hospital mortality was 5.5, with 81.8% sensitivity and 73.5% specificity. Conclusions: The Charlson Comorbidity Index score, which can be obtained at the time of admission, could be associated with the prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Those with a Charlson Comorbidity Index score greater than 5.5 could be more associated with negative outcomes and mortality.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, B., ERDEN, S., ÖZ, A., KARABAĞ, T. (2022). The Relationship of Comorbidities with Intensive Care Unit Admission and Mortality in Patients with COVID-19. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 3, 187–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/417323

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Drosten C, Günther S, Preiser W, et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003
  2. 348(20):1967-1976. [CrossRef] 2. de Groot RJ, Baker SC, Baric RS, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): announcement of the coronavirus Study Group. J Virol. 2013
  3. 87(14):7790-7792. [CrossRef] 3. Zaki AM, van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med. 2012
  4. 367(19):1814- 1820. [CrossRef] 4. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized PatientsWith 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020
  5. 323(11):1061-1069. [CrossRef] 5. Liu J, Liu Y, Xiang P, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts critical illness patients with 2019 coronavirus disease in the early stage. J Transl Med. 2020
  6. 18(1):206. [CrossRef] 6. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020
  7. 323(13):1239-1242. [CrossRef] 7. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987
  8. 40(5):373-383. [CrossRef] 8. Ouellette JR, Small DG, Termuhlen PM. Evaluation of Charlson-age comorbidity index as predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients with colorectal carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004
  9. 8(8):1061-1067. [CrossRef] 9. Gopalswamy N, Malhotra V, Reddy N, et al. Long-term mortality of patients admitted to the intensive care unit for gastrointestinal bleeding. South Med J. 2004
  10. 97(10):955-958. [CrossRef] 10. Perkins AJ, Kroenke K, Unützer J, et al. Common comorbidity scales were similar in their ability to predict health care costs and mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004
  11. 57(10):1040-1048. [CrossRef] 11. Bernardini J, Callen S, Fried L, Piraino B. Inter-rater reliability and annual rescoring of the Charlson comorbidity index. Adv Perit Dial. 2004
  12. Goldstein LB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB, Horner RD. Charlson index comorbidity adjustment for ischemic stroke outcome studies. Stroke. 2004
  13. 35(8):1941-1945. [CrossRef] 12. Sağlık Bakanlığı TC. COVID-19 (SARS-Cov-2 enfeksiyonu) rehberi. https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/38657/0/covi d19salginyonetimivecalismarehberipdf.pdf. 13