Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF VISCOUS DAMPERS CONNECTED TO ADJACENT BUILDINGS ON DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR UNDER SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION EFFECTS

Pages
51–72
Publication Date
2020-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found sufficient to connect a fluid viscous damper only to the top floor (1 FVD) or to the top and middle floor (2 FVD).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the dynamic behavior of two adjacent structures with fluid viscous damper (FVD) was investigated under the influence of earthquake and considering soil-structure interaction (SSI).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The modelling and analysis were made in two-dimensional (2D) space by using ANSYS package program.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found sufficient to connect a fluid viscous damper only to the top floor (1 FVD) or to the top and middle floor (2 FVD).
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fluid viscous dampers · adjacent buildings · soil- structure interaction

Abstract

In this study, the dynamic behavior of two adjacent structures with fluid viscous damper (FVD) was investigated under the influence of earthquake and considering soil-structure interaction (SSI). Adjacent structures with FVD’s were analysed for three different soil types. The modelling and analysis were made in two-dimensional (2D) space by using ANSYS package program. Viscous boundary conditions were used on the boundaries of 2D soil model. The analyses results were obtained in terms of displacement, acceleration, and shear force. The effect of FVD was investigated using different connection types. The damping coefficient of FVD’s was assumed constant in all analyses. When the results of the analysis are examined, it can be seen that FVD’s are effective for seismic response. However, it is necessary to consider the soil-structure interaction. Significant different structural results were obtained between fixed support and three different soil types. For example, in the same model, while the top floor displacement may reduce in Soil Type I, the top floor displacement may increase in Soil Type II. At the end of the study, it was seen that there was no need to connect the FVD to all floors. It was found sufficient to connect a fluid viscous damper only to the top floor (1 FVD) or to the top and middle floor (2 FVD). FVD’s have no effect on buildings with the similar dynamic character. In the analysis for seismic control of adjacent buildings, the effect of soil-structure interaction should certainly be taken into account.

🔖

Cite This Article

HATİPOĞLU, Y. S., DÜZGÜN, O. A. (2020). INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF VISCOUS DAMPERS CONNECTED TO ADJACENT BUILDINGS ON DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR UNDER SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION EFFECTS. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 51–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/417157

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. B. F. Spencer Jr and S. Nagarajaiah, “State of the art of structural control,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 129, no. 7, pp. 845–856, 2003
  2. R. E. Klein and M. D. Healey, “Semi-active control of wind induced oscillations in structures,” in Structural control, Springer, 1987, pp. 354–369
  3. M. Kunieda, “Earthquake prevent design and earthquake proof design for structures,” J. JSME, vol. 79, no. 689, pp. 361–365, 1976
  4. R. E. Christenson, B. F. Spencer Jr, and E. A. Johnson, “Coupled building control using active and smart damping strategies,” Optim. Control Civ. Struct. Eng., pp. 187–195, 1999
  5. C. C. Patel and R. S. Jangid, “Seismic response of dynamically similar adjacent structures connected with viscous dampers,” IES J. Part A Civ. Struct. Eng., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2010
  6. G. P. Cimellaro and D. Lopez-Garcia, “Seismic response of adjacent buildings connected by nonlinear viscous dampers,” in Structural Engineering Research Frontiers, 2007, pp. 1–12
  7. C. C. Patel and R. S. Jangid, “Influence of soil-structure interaction on response of adjacent SDOF structures connected by viscous damper,” 2008
  8. C. C. Patel, “Dynamic response of viscous damper connected similar multi-degree of freedom structures,” Int. J. Earth Sci. Eng., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1068–1071, 2011
  9. C. C. Patel and R. S. Jangid, “Dynamic response of adjacent structures connected by friction damper,” Earthquakes Struct., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 149–169, 2011
  10. A. A. Farghaly, “Optimization of Viscous Dampers with the Influence of Soil Structure Interaction on Response of Two Adjacent 3-D Buildings under seismic load,” Optimization, vol. 4, no. 01, 2014
  11. Y. L. Xu, Q. He, and J. M. Ko, “Dynamic response of damper-connected adjacent buildings under earthquake excitation,” Eng. Struct., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 135–148, 1999
  12. X. X. Qi and K. L. Chang, “Study of application of viscous dampers in seismic joints, proceeding of the International Conference on Structural Dynamics,” Vib. Noise Control. Hong Kong, 1995
  13. Z. Yang, Y. L. Xu, and X. L. Lu, “Experimental seismic study of adjacent buildings with fluid dampers,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 197–205, 2003
  14. A. V Bhaskararao and R. S. Jangid, “Optimum viscous damper for connecting adjacent SDOF structures for harmonic and stationary white‐noise random excitations,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 563–571, 2007
  15. A. V Bhaskararao and R. S. Jangid, “Optimal damping of viscous damper used