Journals / Türkiye Acil Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Kazazedenin bakış açısıyla iş eğitimi ve güvenliğinin değerlendirilmesi

Assessment of vocational training and workplace safety from the perspective of the ınjured worker

Pages
105–113
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions Our study suggested that unqualified workers with low-level training do not receive sufficient vocational training and that they work in un- safe and stressful environments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives To determine the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of oc- cupational accident patients who were admitted to a third level emer- gency unit and assess vocational training and workplace safety from the injured workers’ perspective.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods A questionnaire was given to 506 patients aged 15 years and older be- tween April and May 2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions Our study suggested that unqualified workers with low-level training do not receive sufficient vocational training and that they work in un- safe and stressful environments.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives To determine the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of oc- cupational accident patients who were admitted to a third level emer- gency unit and assess vocational training and workplace safety from the injured workers’ perspective. Methods A questionnaire was given to 506 patients aged 15 years and older be- tween April and May 2011. Results The average age of the patients was 33 years old. The sector with the high- est numbers of injuries was the metal and metal-based products industry (29.1%). The hour in which accidents occurred most often was the sixth hour (16.8%). Most of the injuries were minor (85.8%). The most frequent type of injury was penetrating wounds (35.6%). The most commonly affected area was the extremities (51.8%). 95.5% of the patients were treated as outpa- tients. Patients who were high school graduates were revealed to have had more training in comparison to primary and intermediate school graduates (p=0.001). The most common reasons for primary school graduates to ex- perience occupational accidents were found to be the lack of necessary pre- cautions inside the working environment, insufficient measures taken to prevent accidents, and a stressful workplace environment (p=0.016). Work- ers between the ages of 15 and 25, along with those who had worked for less than six months, were exposed to more occupational accidents when compared with all other workers (p=0.002, p=0.001, respectively). Conclusions Our study suggested that unqualified workers with low-level training do not receive sufficient vocational training and that they work in un- safe and stressful environments.

Özet

Amaç Amacımız üçüncü basamak bir acil servise başvuran iş kazası hastalarının, sosyo-demografik, klinik özelliklerini belirlemek ve yaralanmış işçinin ba- kış açısıyla iş eğitimi ve iş yeri güvenliğini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem Nisan ve Mayıs aylarında, 15 yaş ve üzerindeki, toplam 506 hastaya anket uygulaması yapıldı. Bulgular Hastaların ortalama yaşı 33 yıl idi. En sık yaralanmanın olduğu sektör, metal ve metalden mamul eşya sanayiydi (%29.1). En sık kazanın ger- çekleştiği saat, çalışmanın altıncı saatiydi (%16.8). Yaralanmalar sık- lıkla minördü (%85.8). En sık yaralanma mekanizması penetran (delici) yaralanmalardı (%35.6). En sık etkilenen bölge ekstremitelerdi (%51.8). Hastaların %95.5’i ayaktan tedavi ve taburcu oldu. Lise mezunları, ilk ve ortaokul mezunlarına göre daha fazla iş eğitimi verildiğini belirtmiştir (p=0.001). İlkokul mezunlarına göre iş kazalarının en sık nedenleri, işye- rinde gerekli önlemlerin alınmaması, yeterli tedbirlerin olmaması veya işyerinin stresli olmasını daha fazla ifade ettikleri saptandı (p=0.016). 15- 25 yaş grubunda olan veya çalışma süresi altı ayı geçmeyen çalışanların, diğer tüm çalışanlara göre daha sık kaza yaşadıkları gözlendi (sırasıyla, p=0.002, p=0.001). Sonuç Çalışmamız düşük eğitim düzeyine sahip vasıfsız işçilerin, yeterli iş eğitimi almadıklarını, iş yeri güvenliği yetersiz ve stresli iş ortamlarında çalıştıkla- rını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ADA, E., SEVER, M., AKSAY, E. (2013). Kazazedenin bakış açısıyla iş eğitimi ve güvenliğinin değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Acil Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 105–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/417038

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Yardım N, Cipil Z, Vardar C, et al. Mortality rates due to oc- cupational accidents and diseases between 2000-2005 in Turkey. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 2007;34:264-271. Available in: http:// www.dicle.edu.tr/fakulte/tip/dergi/yayin/5.Isveisci sag.pdf
  2. Republic of Turkey, Social Insurance Institution. Yearly Statis- tical Report (2010). Turkish Social Insurance Institution Web Site. Accessed date: June 12, 2012. Available at: http://www. sgk.gov.tr/wps/portal/tr/kurumsal/istatistikler/sgk_istatis- tik_yilliklari/
  3. Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). Labor Force Statistics (2007). Accessed June 07, 2012. Available at: http://tuikapp. tuik.gov.tr/isgucuapp/isgucu.zul?dil=2
  4. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Accessed January 27, 2011. Available in:
  5. Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) for Doctors. Appen- dix 5. Trauma Scores: Revised and Pediatric. 7th ed. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2004
  6. Ince H, Ince N, Taviloğlu K, Güloğlu R. A different approach to trauma scoring. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2006;12:195- 200
  7. Karim B. Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) Score. Overview of the anatomical scoring tool. London, UK, March 10, 2007. Ac- cessed June 17, 2011. Available in: http://www.trauma.org/ index.php/main/article/510/
  8. Committee on Medical Aspects of Automotive Safety: rating the severity of tissue damage. The Abbreviated scale. J Am Med Assoc 1971;215:277-80
  9. Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 1974;14:187-96
  10. Karim B. Injury Severity Score. Overview and Desktop Calcula- tor. London, UK, March 10, 2007. Accessed June 17, 2011. Avail- able in:
  11. Stephenson S, Henley G, Harrison JE, Langley JD. Diagnosis based injury severity scaling: investigation of a method us- ing Australian and New Zealand hospitalisations. Inj Prev 2004;10:379-83
  12. Santana VS, Xavier C, Moura MC, Oliveira R, Espírito-Santo JS, Araújo G. Severity of occupational injuries treated in emer- gency services. Rev Saude Publica 2009;43:750-60
  13. Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma 1987;27:370-8
  14. Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Wolfe R. TRISS: does it get better than this? Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:181-6
  15. Larsson T. The diffusion of employer responsi