SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 70 - Sayı: 4

The Privatization of the Railway Service in Britain on the basis of the Provision and the Organization of the Service

Hizmet Sunumu ve Örgütlenmesi Temelinde İngiltere'de Demiryolu Hizmetinin Özelleştirilmesi

Levent DEMİRELLİ
Pages
903–930
Publication Date
2015-12-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Brown‟s government) on the basis of provision and organization of the service

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Conservative Governments of Britain in 1980s and 1990s claimed that the privatization of the railway service would result in higher competition, efficiency rates and quality of the services and inreduction of the public expenditures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Privatization has resulted in new monopolies, reduction of the quality of services and of infrastructure and in increase of the transportation prices, operation costs of the private enterprises, and the public subsidies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Brown‟s government) on the basis of provision and organization of the service
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Demiryolu hizmeti · British Rail · özelleştirme

Abstract

Conservative Governments of Britain in 1980s and 1990s claimed that the privatization of the railway service would result in higher competition, efficiency rates and quality of the services and inreduction of the public expenditures. In practice, however, these dreams of Conservatives have not come true entirely. Privatization has resulted in new monopolies, reduction of the quality of services and of infrastructure and in increase of the transportation prices, operation costs of the private enterprises, and the public subsidies. It has also caused security problems. This paper discusses the privatization process and its results between 1979 (the year that M. Thatcher came to power) and 2010 (the end of G. Brown‟s government) on the basis of provision and organization of the service

Özet

İngiltere‟de iktidarda olduğu 1980'li ve 1990'lı yıllarda Muhafazakâr Parti, demiryolu hizmetinin özelleştirilmesinin rekabet, verimlilik oranları ve hizmet kalitesindeki artışlar, kamu harcamalarında düşüşler ile sonuçlanacağını ileri sürmüştür. Fakat pratikte Muhafazakâr Parti'nin bu rüyası gerçekleşmemiştir. Aksine özelleştirme, yeni tekeller, hizmet ve altyapı kalitesinde düşüşler, taşımacılık, işletme maliyetleri, kamu sübvansiyonlarında artışlar ve güvenlik sorunları üretmiştir. Bu çalışma, 1979 yılında başlayan M. Thatcher ve 2010 yılında sonlanan G. Brown dönemleri arasında kalan sürede özelleştirme sürecini ve sonuçlarını incelemektedir. Yapılan inceleme, hizmet sunumu ve örgütlenmesi temelinde gerçekleştirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRELLİ, L. (2015). The Privatization of the Railway Service in Britain on the basis of the Provision and the Organization of the Service. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 70 - Sayı: 4, 903–930. https://ajindex.com/articles/416755

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Barda, Süleyman (1964), Münakale Ekonomisi (İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Yayını). Bradshaw, W. P. (1997), “Competition In The Rail Industry”, Oxford Review Of Economic Policy, 13 (1): 93-103.
  2. Casson, Mark (2004), “The Future Of The UK Railway System: Michael Brooke‟s Vision”, International Business Review, 13: 181-214.
  3. Charlton, Clive, Richard Gibb, Jon Shaw (1997), “Regulation And Continuing Monopoly On Britain‟s Railways”, Journal Of Transport Geography, 5 (2): 147-153.
  4. Cole, Bart ve Christine Cooper (2006), “Deskilling In The 21st Century: The Case Of Rail Privatisation”, Critical Perspectives On Accounting, 17: 601-625.
  5. Crompton, Gerald ve Robert Jupe (2003), “„A Lot Of Friction At The Interfaces‟: The Regulation Of Britain‟s Privatised Railway System”, Financial Accountability & Management, 19 (4):397-418.
  6. Crompton, Gerald ve Robert Jupe (2007), “Network Rail – Forward Or Backward? Not-For-Profit In British Transport”, Business History, 49 (6): 908-928.
  7. Curwen, Peter (1997), “The End of the Line for British Rail”, Public Money & Management, 17 (4): 55-67.
  8. Denham, Andrew ve Mark Garnett (1998), British Think-Tanks And The Climate Of Opinion (London: UCL Press). Dixon, John ve Melanie Joyner (2000), “Privatization Of British Rail: The Holy Grail Or A Poisoned Chalice?”, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 22 (3): 630-634.
  9. Else, Peter (1996), “Subsidy Requirements In A Restructured Rail Network With Particular Reference To British Rail”, Transport Policy, 3 (½): 13-15.
  10. Evans, Andrew W. (2007), “Rail Safety and Rail Privatisation in Britain”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39: 510-523.
  11. Gibb, Richard, Theresa Lowndes, Clive Charlton (1996), “The Privatization Of British Rail”, Applied Geography, 16 (1): 35-51.
  12. Glaister, Stephen (2002), “UK Transport Policy 1997-2001, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18 (2): 154-186.
  13. Haywood, Russ (2007), “Britain‟s National Railway Network: Fit For Purpose In The 21st Century?”, Journal of Transport Geography, 15: 198-216.
  14. Jupe, Robert (2009), “New Labour, Network Rail And The Third Way”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22 (5): 709-735.
  15. Jupe, Robert (2009a), “New Labour, Public-Private Partnerships And Rail Transport Policy”, Economic Affairs, 29 (1): 20-25.
  16. Jupe, Robert (2010), “A Model Or A Policy Muddle? An Evaluation Of Rail Franchising In The UK”, Public Money & Management, 30 (6): 347-354.
  17. Jupe, Robert (2011), “„A Poll Tax On Wheels‟: Might The Move To Privatise Rail In Britain Hav