Journals / Genel Türk Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4

THE APPEARANCE AND FORMATION OF THE ANCIENT TURKIC WRITTEN LANGUAGE

Pages
261–272
Publication Date
2020-07-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The author conducted an analysis of these historical values and proved it was the own creation nomadic people.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are three different opinions about the origin of old turkic rune alphabet.
📊
Key Findings & Data:They are Aramey, Sogdian and it's an own Central asian nomads creation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The author conducted an analysis of these historical values and proved it was the own creation nomadic people.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ancient Turkic Language · Runic · Phonogram

Abstract

There are three different opinions about the origin of old turkic rune alphabet. They are Aramey, Sogdian and it's an own Central asian nomads creation. Due to the results of last years archeological excavations carried out on the territory of a place of residence of ancient nomads (modern north places –north of Huang-he, Mongolian territory) and preserved monuments, official Chinese sources (V B.C.- VI A.D. ) concerning to shuji writing we have got the possibility to pay attention to the third opinion about the origin of writing. The author analyzed every petroglyth or tanba preserved in Central and Middle Asia and every writing of different periods. The author conducted an analysis of these historical values and proved it was the own creation nomadic people.

Özet

There are three different opinions about the origin of Old Turkic rune alphabet. They are Aramey, Sogdian and it's an own Central asian nomads creation. Due to the results of last years archeological excavations carried out on the territory of a place of residence of ancient nomads (modern north places –north of Huang-he, Mongolian territory) and preserved monuments, official Chinese sources (V B.C.- VI A.D. ) concerning to shuji writing, we have got the possibility to pay attention to the third opinion about the origin of writing. The author analyzed every petroglyph or tanba preserved in Central and Middle Asia and every writing of different periods. The author conducted an analysis of these historical values and proved it was the own creation nomadic people.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARTKOZHA, K., KHARJAUBAY, J. (2020). THE APPEARANCE AND FORMATION OF THE ANCIENT TURKIC WRITTEN LANGUAGE. Genel Türk Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4, 261–272. https://ajindex.com/articles/416030

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Batsaıhan Z. Sıunnugıın «kemu» bıchıg, tuunıı holbogdol. // SA.T.XIV. UB.1994.108-115 p
  2. Bıchurın N.Ia. (Iaknıf). Sobranıe svedenıı o narodah, obıtavshıh v Sredneı Azıı v drevnıe vremena. М-Л.1950.т.І
  3. Damdınsúren A. Arheologıın shınjılgeegeer oldson hunnugıın bıchgıın dursgaluud. // SA.T.V.fasc.1-13. UB.1972.99-111 тал
  4. Huang bo rong.Xian dai han yu, Beijing.2004.163 5. Istrin V.А. Vozniknovenie i razvitie pis’ma. М.1965
  5. Jungo tarıhnamalaryndaǵy qazaqqa qatysty derekter. t.II. Pekın.2003
  6. Kyzlasov I.L. Runıcheskıe pısmennostı Evrazııskıh stepeı. М.1994
  7. Lıvshıts V.A. O proıshojdenıı drevneturkskoı runıcheskoı pısmennostı // Arheologıcheskıe ıssledovanııa drevnogo ı srednevekovogo Kazahstana.А-А.1980.с.3-13
  8. Mongolyn arheologı. UB.2002
  9. Nemeth J. Die inscriften des Schatzcs von Nage-Szent-Miklos. Leipzig.1932
  10. Novogradova E.A. V strane petroglıfov ı edelveısov. М.1982
  11. Novogradova E.A. Arashan-had – drevneıshıı pamıatnık ızobrazıtelnogo ıskusstva Vostochnyı Mongolıı. // Istorııa ı kultury Tsentralnoı Azıı. М.1983.p.303-310
  12. Okladnıkov A.P. Tsentralnoazıatskıı ochag pervobytnogo ıskusstva. Novosıbırsk.1972
  13. Qazaq tіlі grammatıkasy. А.2002
  14. Sartqoja Q. Baıyrgy turіk jazuynyn genezısі. Astana. 2003
  15. Sartqojauly Q. Altaıdan tabylǵan ejelgі túrіk jazuu // Uluslararasi Turkoloji kongresi. Turkstan.2009. c.137-145
  16. Sherbak A.M. Turkskaıa runıka. St-B.2001
  17. Sherbak A.M. Neskolko slov o prıemah chtenııa runıcheskıh nadpıseı, naıdennyh na Donu // СА. 1954.p.269-282
  18. Sherbak A.M. O runıcheskoı pısmennostı v yugo-vostochnoı Evrope // СТ. 1971.№4.p.76-82
  19. Zhonggou gudai huo bi fa zhan shi, Beijing. 1958, 71-72