Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Determining Environmental Factors Affecting Bird Diversity

Pages
244–251
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it is thought that the results of this research will be important both in terms of studies conducted in Çandır District and in terms of studies on bird diversity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim of study: The main purpose of the study is to determine the site factors affecting bird diversity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: In present study, Observations were conducted regularly in a total of 43 sample sites in Çandır District, throughout each month in 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it is thought that the results of this research will be important both in terms of studies conducted in Çandır District and in terms of studies on bird diversity.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2016 · 43 sample
⚙️Variables:Alpha Species Diversity · Bird Density · Correlation

Abstract

Aim of study: The main purpose of the study is to determine the site factors affecting bird diversity. Area of study: This study was performed in the Çandır District, Isparta which is located inner part of the Western Mediterranean region. Material and methods: In present study, Observations were conducted regularly in a total of 43 sample sites in Çandır District, throughout each month in 2016. Also, each sample site was observed using point-counting techniques from the direct observation techniques. In the present study, alpha diversity (Species richness, Menhinick, Margalef, Shannon-Wiener, Brillouin, Simpson, Berger-Parker, and Fisher’s Alpha) values were calculated, and significant variables were determined by using correlation analysis. Main results: A significant correlation (p=0.05) was determined between alpha diversity values and both environmental and climatic variables. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to compare alpha diversity indexes with each other. Species richness, Shannon, and Brillouin indexes were determined as the variables having the strongest correlation with environmental variables. Highlights: A better understanding of factors affecting bird species diversity, which are sensitive species of ecosystems, is of great importance for the detection and monitoring of future changes. Especially when it is considered in terms of parameter selection for modeling studies, the mentioned importance increases even more. Therefore, it is thought that the results of this research will be important both in terms of studies conducted in Çandır District and in terms of studies on bird diversity.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜEL, H., ÖZDEMİR, S., R, D. A., ERTUĞRUL, E. (2021). Determining Environmental Factors Affecting Bird Diversity. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 244–251. https://ajindex.com/articles/415603

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Berger, W. H. & Parker, F. L. (1970). Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science, 168(3937), 1345-1347.
  2. Burger, J. & Gochfeld, M. (2004). Marine birds as sentinels of environmental pollution. EcoHealth, 1(3), 263-274.
  3. Donald, P. F., Pisano, G., Rayment, M. D. & Pain, D. J. (2002). The common agricultural policy EU enlargement and the conservation of Europe’s farmland birds. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environments, 89, 167-182.
  4. Grumbin, R. E. (1994). What is ecosystem management?. Conservation Biology, 8 (1), 27–38. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010027. Hitch, A. T. & Leberg, P. L. (2007). Breeding distributions of North American bird species moving north as a result of climate change. Conservation Biology, 21(2), 534-539.
  5. Jost, L. (2006). Entropy and diversity. Oikos, 113(2), 363-375.
  6. Katayama, N., Amano, T., Naoe, S., Yamakita, T., Komatsu, I., Takagawa, S. I., Sato, N., Ueta, M. & Miyashita, T. (2014) Landscape heterogeneity–biodiversity relationship: effect of range size. Plos One, 9(3), e93359. Kosicki, J. Z. & Chylarecki, P. (2012). Effect of climate, topography and habitat on species-richness of breeding birds in Poland. Basic and applied ecology, 13(5), 475-483.
  7. Li, Y., Brose, U., Meyer, K. & Rall, B. C. (2017). How patch size and refuge availability change interaction strength and population dynamics: a combined individual-and population-based modeling experiment. PeerJ, 5, e2993. Margalef, R. (1968). Perspectives in Ecological Theory: IL, 111. Chicago: University of Chicago press. Mert, A. & Kıraç, A. (2017). Habitat suitability mapping of Anatololacerta danfordi (Günter, 1876) in Isparta-Sütçüler District. Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research, 1(1), 16-22, ISSN, 2587-0742.
  8. Negiz, M. G. & Özkan, K. (2019). Reproducing a component diversity index for regional biodiversity assessments. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 28(12 A), 9746-9752.
  9. Oğurlu, İ. (2000). Biyolojik Mücadele: S.D.Ü. Yayın no:8, O.F. Yayın no:1. Isparta: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Yayınları.
  10. Özdemir, S., Negiz, M. G., Turhan, U. U., Şenol, A. & Arslan, M. (2017). Indicator plant species of alpha diversity in Kuyucak Mountain district. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 18(2), 102-109.
  11. Özkan, K. (2007). Ecological properties of Yazili Canyon nature park. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Forestry, General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks, Technical Report of GEF Project, 104. Özkan, K.