SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Insight Turkey / 2021 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4

Turkey’s Strategic Conduct under the Changing International System

Murat YEŞİLTAŞ
Ferhat PİRİNÇÇİ
Pages
119–146
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our aim in this article is to describe how Turkey can deal with the new reality of the international system and pursue and protect its important interests by developing a comprehensive grand strategy

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article analyzes how Turkey should adjust its grand strategy under the changing international order.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It claims that the international order has undergone a significant transformation that is pushing Turkey to relocate its international position.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our aim in this article is to describe how Turkey can deal with the new reality of the international system and pursue and protect its important interests by developing a comprehensive grand strategy
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This article analyzes how Turkey should adjust its grand strategy under the changing international order. It claims that the international order has undergone a significant transformation that is pushing Turkey to relocate its international position. First, the article examines the characteristic features of the changing dynamics of the international system; it then sheds light on the new aspects of Turkey’s changing strategic landscape. By taking into consideration the transformation in Turkish foreign and security policy since the Arab Uprising, the article argues that Turkey needs a basis for determining what is important and what is not, what the primary threats to the nation’s interests are, and how best to serve those interests in a way that is attentive to the costs and risks it is willing to bear. Our aim in this article is to describe how Turkey can deal with the new reality of the international system and pursue and protect its important interests by developing a comprehensive grand strategy

🔖

Cite This Article

YEŞİLTAŞ, M., PİRİNÇÇİ, F. (2021). Turkey’s Strategic Conduct under the Changing International System. Insight Turkey, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4, 119–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/415561

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, “Türkiye’nin Salgının Önlenmesinde Örnek Alınan Bir Konuma Gelmesi Hepimizin Ortak Başarısıdır,” Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı, (May 28, 2020), retrieved September 4, 2021, from https://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/410/120316/-turkiye-nin-salginin-onlenmesinde-ornek-alinan-bir-konuma-gelmesi-hepimizin-ortak-basarisidir-. 2. Øystein Tunsjø, The Return of Bipolarity in World Politics China, the United States, and Geostructural Realism, (Columbia University Press, 2018)
  2. Clifford Kupchan, “The New Bipolarity: Reason for Cautious Optimism,” Valdai Club, (October 21, 2021), retrieved from https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/the-newbipolarity-reason-for-cautious-optimism. 3. Muhittin Ataman, “Coronavirus and International Organizations,” SETA, (April 22, 2020), retrieved from https://www.setav.org/en/coronavirus-and-international-organizations/. 4. Barış Özdal, Is the EU a Political Dwarf, a Military Worm? (Bursa: Dora, 2013)
  3. Filiz Cicioğlu, “Can the EU Leave the Confidence Crisis behind?” Kriter, Vol. 5, No. 46 (May 2020). 5. Mehmet Halil Mustafa Bektaş, “Examining the Possibility of an Eastphalian International Order,” İstanbul University Faculty of Political Science Magazine, Vol. 26, No. 2 (2017), pp. 111-130. 6. Amitav Acharya “After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order,” Ethics and International Affairs, Vol. 31, No. 3 (2017), pp. 271-285. 7. John Levis Gaddis, Strategy of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of American National Security Policy During the Cold War, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005). 8. Tayyar Arı, International Relations and Foreign Policy, (İstanbul: Alfa, 2017), pp. 156-178. 9. Arı, International Relations and Foreign Policy, pp. 156-178. 10. Nuno Monteiro, Theory of Unipolar Politics, (Cambridge University Press, 2014). 11. Acharya, “After Liberal Hegemony,” pp. 271-285. 12. Muzaffer Ercan Yılmaz, “The Rise of Ethnic Nationalism, Intra-State Conflicts and Conflict Resolution,” TESAM Akademi, Vol. 5, No. 1 (2018), pp. 11-33. 13. Acharya, “After Liberal Hegemony,” pp. 271-285. 14. “MİKTA,” Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey, retrieved April 10, 2020, from http://www. mfa.gov.tr/mikta-meksika_-endonezya_-kore_-avustralya_.tr.mfa. 15. Ziya Öniş and Mustafa Kutlay, “Rising Powers in a Changing Global Order: The Political Economy of Turkey in the Age of BRICs,” Third World Quarterly, Vol. 34. No. 8 (2013), pp. 1409-1426. 16. Matthew Stephen, “States, Norms, and Power: Emer