Journals / Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters / 2022 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Minimum weight design of reinforced concrete beams utilizing grey wolf and backtracking search optimization algorithms

Pages
72–79
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, it can be deducted from optimal beam designs that the GW algorithm is more viable to minimize reinforced concrete beam design.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, optimal weight design of a reinforced concrete beam subjected to various loading conditions is investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, while the magnitudes of distributed load and twopoints load are remained constant, the distances between two-points loads are taken as 2m, 3m and 4m, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, it can be deducted from optimal beam designs that the GW algorithm is more viable to minimize reinforced concrete beam design.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this study, optimal weight design of a reinforced concrete beam subjected to various loading conditions is investigated. The purpose of the optimization is to attain the minimum weight design of the reinforced concrete beam under distributed and two-point loads. The design problem is handled under three different design load cases. The two-point loads are affected on beam-to-beam connection nodes of reinforced concrete beams. Thus, while the magnitudes of distributed load and twopoints load are remained constant, the distances between two-points loads are taken as 2m, 3m and 4m, respectively. The width and height of the rectangular cross-section of the concrete beam, and the diameters of the longitudinal and confinement steel rebars are treated as design variables of the optimum design problem. The design constraints of the optimization problem consist of the geometric constraints and necessities of the Turkish Requirements for Design and Construction of Reinforced Concrete Structures (TS500), and Turkish Building Earthquake Code (TBEC). As two novel metaheuristics, grey wolf (GW) and backtracking search (BS) optimization algorithms are selected as optimizers. Both algorithms are independently operated five times for three different design problems. Thus, the obtained results are examined statistically to compare in accordance with algorithmic performances. The optimal findings from optimization algorithms show that the GW algorithm is a little bit more robust on the exploitation phase, while the BS algorithm is stronger on the exploration phase. Moreover, it can be deducted from optimal beam designs that the GW algorithm is more viable to minimize reinforced concrete beam design.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNCA, O., ÇARBAŞ, S. (2022). Minimum weight design of reinforced concrete beams utilizing grey wolf and backtracking search optimization algorithms. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 72–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/415493

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abubakar J, Anum B, Iaren CT (2021). Design optimization of rectangular beams using genetic algorithm. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 4(2), 66–78.
  2. Alimoradi M, Azgomi H, Asghari A (2022). Trees social relations optimization algorithm: A new Swarm-Based metaheuristic technique to solve continuous and discrete optimization problems. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation: 629–664.
  3. Aydogdu I (2016). Cost optimization of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls under seismic loading using a biogeography-based optimization algorithm with Levy flights. Engineering Optimization, 49(3), 381–400,
  4. Aydogdu I (2016). New Iterative method to Calculate Base Stress of Footings under Biaxial Bending. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 8(4), 40–48.
  5. Carbas S, Toktas A, Ustun D (eds) (2021). Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms for Engineering Optimization Applications. Springer Tracts in Nature-Inspired Computing. Springer Singapore, Singapore. Chen D, Ge Y, Wan Y, Deng Y, Chen Y, Zou F (2022). Poplar optimization algorithm: A new meta-heuristic optimization technique for numerical optimization and image segmentation. Expert Systems with Applications, 117118. Civicioglu P (2013). Backtracking search optimization algorithm for numerical optimization problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219(15), 8121–8144.
  6. Coello CC, Hernández FS, Farrera FA (1997). Optimal design of reinforced concrete beams using genetic algorithms. Expert Systems with Applications, 12(1), 101–108.
  7. Erdal F, Tas S, Tunca O, Carbas S (2016). Effect of random number sequences on the optimum design of castellated beams with improved harmony search method. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 8(3), 25–39.
  8. Fahr S, Mitsos A, Bongartz D (2022). Simultaneous deterministic global flowsheet optimization and heat integration: Comparison of formulations. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 107790. Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV (2016). A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony search. Simulation, 76(2), 60–68.
  9. Goldberg DE, Holland JH (1988). Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Machine Learning, 3(2): 95–99.
  10. Hasan QF, Al-Mamany DA, Fayadh OK (2019) Design of reinforced concrete deep beams using particle swarm optimization technique. Karbala International Journal of Modern Science, 5(4), 255–265.
  11. Jin C, Chung WC, Kwon DS, Kim MH (2021). Optimization of tuned mass damper for seismic control of submerged floating tunnel. Engineering Structures, 11