Journals / Resilience / 2018 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Gender Sensitive Disaster Risk Management

Toplumsal Cinsiyete Duyarlı Afet Risk Yönetimi

Journal
Resilience
Pages
1–12
Publication Date
2018-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

During the planning processes, there is an urgent need for the raising awareness, and train the trainers and practitioners in the emergency and disaster management field, as well as policy makers in all level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Studies on disaster resilience point out the necessity of participation of all parts of communities in disaster management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Strategies based on gender-sensitive disaster mitigation planning are more successful to reduce all vulnerabilities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:During the planning processes, there is an urgent need for the raising awareness, and train the trainers and practitioners in the emergency and disaster management field, as well as policy makers in all level.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:toplumsal cinsiyet · zarargörebilirlik · kapasite

Abstract

Studies on disaster resilience point out the necessity of participation of all parts of communities in disaster management. Lessons from previous disasters indicated that existing social vulnerabilities based on gender roles are reducing local disaster resilience and preparedness capacities. Strategies based on gender-sensitive disaster mitigation planning are more successful to reduce all vulnerabilities. During the disaster mitigation and preparedness stages, a more proactive and gender based risk management framework, helps to recognize more women participation and improve capasities, as well as encourage gender equality and empower women. Gender-sensitive approach should be integrated into the disaster risk management and given equally place to women in planning. Designing gender-sensitive planning is right strategy for improving disaster capacity and resilience. During the planning processes, there is an urgent need for the raising awareness, and train the trainers and practitioners in the emergency and disaster management field, as well as policy makers in all level.

Özet

Afete dirençli toplumlar için afet risk yönetiminin yaygınlaştırılmasını gerektirmektedir. Toplumda mevcut olan sosyal zarargörebilirlikler (kırılganlıklar) bir afet durumunda müdahaleyi daha karmaşık hale getirmekte, iyileştirmeyi daha da zorlaştırmaktadır. Toplumun bireylere kadın veya erkek olarak yüklediği sosyokültürel roller ve sorumluluklar (toplumsal cinsiyet) bu kırılganlıkları arttırmakta afet risklerini daha da yönetilemez hale getirmektedir. Kadınları afetlerde mağdur ve riskli gruplardan kabul eden genel yaklaşım bulunmaktadır. Buna karşılık, toplumsal cinsiyete dayalı kapasite ve yeteneklerini geliştirmeyi amaçlayan yaklaşımların daha başarılı olduğu saptanmıştır. Bu makalede afet yönetiminin zarar azaltma, hazırlık ve müdahale evrelerinde yapılan planlamaların toplumsal cinsiyet bakımından yeniden gözden geçirilmesi, toplumsal cinsiyet duyarlığının geliştirilmesine yönelik stratejik planlama önerileri tartışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKAY, N., İLKKARACAN, İ. (2018). Gender Sensitive Disaster Risk Management. Resilience, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 1–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/415477

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Açıkalın O. (2017). Deprem Bağlamında Dirayetli Toplumun Neresindeyiz: Yüzyılın Hesabı. Yeni İnsan Yay.138. Ariyabandu M.M., Wickramasinghe M. (2003). Gender Dimensions in Disaster Management: A Guide for South Africa. Sri Lanka: ITGD South Africa Publication. Bradshaw S. (2004). Socio-economic Impacts of Natural Disasters: A Gender Analysis https://www.gdnonline.org/sourcebook/chapt/doc_view.php?id=2&docid=50
  2. Dedeoğlu N. (2011). Van Depremi’nden alınacak dersler. Toplum ve Hekim, 26 (5): 378-382.
  3. Ecevit Y. (2011). Toplumsal Cinsiyet Sosyolojisi ed. Ecevit Y., Karkıner N. (T.C. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını, No: 2307, Eskişehir). El-Masri R., Harvey C., Garwood R. (2013). Shifting Sands: Changing gender roles among refugees in Lebanon. Oxfam, 43. EMI (2015). The Natural Disaster Risk Management Program, http://emi-megacities.org/ndrmp/
  4. Enarson E. (2012). Women Confronting Natural Disaster: from vulnerability to resilience. Lynne Rienner Publ. US. 245s. Ferris D.E. (2012). Disaster Risk Management: A gender-sensitive approach is a smart approach, in Chapter 4: The Year of Recurring Disasters: A Review of Natural Disasters. 2012 (https://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2013/03/natural-disaster-review-ferris
  5. Fordham M. (2008). The Place of Gender in Earthquake Vulnerability and Mitigation, 2 Ocak 2009, http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/RMS/july2000/Papers/fordham0208.pdf
  6. Hattatoğlu D. (2011). Gender and Labor within the Turkish Context of Local Development in the Era of Globalization, Analyzing Gender, Intersectionality, and Multiple Inequalities: Global, Transnational and Local Contexts’de, E. Ngan-Ling Chow, M. Texler Segal, L. Tan (ed.), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, s.139 – 159. Hemachandra K., Amaratunga D., Haigh R. (2018). Role of women in disaster risk governance. Procedia Eng., 212: 1187-1194.
  7. İlkkaracan A.İ. (2008). Birleşmiş Milletler CEDAW Sürecinde Sivil Toplum Örgütleri, Türkiye Gölge Raporları, Kadının İnsan Hakları (KİH)-Yeni Çözümler Derneği, İstanbul, 182 s. İnal E., Erbaydar Paksoy N. (2016). 2012-2023 Ulusal Deprem Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı’nın toplumsal cinsiyet bakış açısı ile incelenmesi. Fe Dergi, Cilt 8, Sayı 1. IASC (2018). Gender Handbook for Humanitarian Action. https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/system/files/2018-iasc_gender_handbook_for_humanitarian_action_eng_0.pdf
  8. Işık Ö., Özer N., Sayın N., Mishal A., Gündoğdu O., Özçep F. (2015). Are women in Turkey both risks and resources in disaster management. Int’l J. Res. Publi