SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Food and Health / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of total phenolic contents and antioxidant activities of propolis in different solvents

Tuğba Nigar BOZKUŞ
Orhan DEGER
Pages
111–117
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After extraction of propolis and evaluation of the total polyphenol and flavonoid content and antioxidant capacity, we concluded that it is mostly dissolved in DMSO, and after that in ethanol, acetone, glycerol respectively, and the least in water according to our extraction and analysis methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine which solvent is the best for the solubility of the propolis by using concentrations of total polyphenols and flavonoids, ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay, and total antioxidant status (TAS) in extracts of propolis from different provinces of Türkiye prepared with water, ethanol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), glycerol and acetone.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Propolis samples were lyophilized in the same solvents except for that glycerol and acetone.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After extraction of propolis and evaluation of the total polyphenol and flavonoid content and antioxidant capacity, we concluded that it is mostly dissolved in DMSO, and after that in ethanol, acetone, glycerol respectively, and the least in water according to our extraction and analysis methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study aims to determine which solvent is the best for the solubility of the propolis by using concentrations of total polyphenols and flavonoids, ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay, and total antioxidant status (TAS) in extracts of propolis from different provinces of Türkiye prepared with water, ethanol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), glycerol and acetone. Propolis samples were lyophilized in the same solvents except for that glycerol and acetone. Total concentrations of polyphenols and flavonoids, FRAP, and TAS of both normal and lyophilized extracts were found be consistent when compared with each other. After extraction of propolis and evaluation of the total polyphenol and flavonoid content and antioxidant capacity, we concluded that it is mostly dissolved in DMSO, and after that in ethanol, acetone, glycerol respectively, and the least in water according to our extraction and analysis methods.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKUŞ, T. N., DEGER, O. (2022). Comparison of total phenolic contents and antioxidant activities of propolis in different solvents. Food and Health, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 111–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/415367

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Alencar, S.M., Oldoni, T.L.C., Castro, M.L., Cabral, I.S.R., Costa-Neto, C.M., Cury, J.A., Rosalen, P.L., Ikegaki, M. (2007). Chemical composition and biological activity of a new type of Brazilian propolis: Red propolis. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 113(2), 278-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.06.005
  2. Aliyazicioglu, Y., Demir, S., Turan, I., Cakiroglu, T.N., Akalin, I., Deger, O., Bedir, A. (2011). Preventive and protective effects of Turkish propolis on H2O2-induced DNA damage in foreskin fibroblast cell lines. Acta Biologica Hungarica, 62(4), 388-396. https://doi.org/10.1556/abiol.62.2011.4.5
  3. Arslan, S., Silici, S., Perçin, D., Koç, A.N., Er, Ö. (2012). Antimicrobial activity of poplar propolis on mutans streptococci and caries development in rats. Turkish Journal of Biology, 36, 65-73.
  4. Azarshinfam, N., Tanomand, A., Soltanzadeh, H., Rad, F.A. (2021). Evaluation of anticancer effects of propolis extract with or without combination with layered double hydroxide nanoparticles on Bcl-2 and Bax genes expression in HT-29 cell lines. Gene Reports, 23, 101031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2021.101031
  5. Bankova, V.S., De Castro, S.L., Marcucci, M.C. (2000). Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin. Apidologie, 31, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2000102
  6. Banskota, A.H., Nagaoka, T., Sumioka, L.Y., Tezuka, Y., Awale, S., Midorikawa, K., Matsushige, K., Kadota, S. (2002). Antiproliferative activity of the Netherlands propolis and its active principles in cancer cell lines. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 80(1), 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00022-3
  7. Banskota, A.H., Tezuka, Y., Adnyana, I.K., Midorikawa, K., Matsushige, K., Message, D., Huertas, A.A.G., Kadota, S. (2000). Cytotoxic, hepatoprotective and free radical scavenging effects of propolis from Brazil, Peru, the Netherlands and China. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 72(1-2), 239-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00252-X
  8. Barlak, Y., Değer, O., Uçar, M., Çakıroğlu, T.N. (2015). Effects of Turkish propolis extract on secretion of polymorphonuclear elastase following respiratory burst. Turkish Journal of Biology, 39, 194-201. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1402-48
  9. Benkovic, V., Horvat Knezevi, A., Dikic, D., Lisicic, D., Orsolic, N., Basic, I., Kosalec, I., Kopjar, N. (2008). Radioprotective effects of propolis and quercetin in γ-irradiated mice evaluated by the alkaline comet assay. Phytomedicine, 15(10), 851-858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2008.02.010 Burdock,