Journals / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation / 2022 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1

Pressure-Regulated Volume Control and Pressure-Control Ventilation Modes in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Failure

Pages
18–23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The pressure-regulated volume-control mode seems to be a safer option for physicians who do not have enough experience in using pressurecontrol ventilation mode.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The objective of this study is to present our experience using the pressure-regulated volume control and the pressure-control ventilation modes in children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patient’s ventilation parameters (of the first 7 days of ventilation or of the whole ventilation period, if the patient had been ventilated less than 7 days), SpO2, blood gases, and demographic data were collected from the pediatric intensive care unit database.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The pressure-regulated volume-control mode seems to be a safer option for physicians who do not have enough experience in using pressurecontrol ventilation mode.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The objective of this study is to present our experience using the pressure-regulated volume control and the pressure-control ventilation modes in children. Methods: Patients with acute respiratory failure ventilated with pressure-regulated volume control or pressure-control modes were retrospectively evaluated. The patient’s ventilation parameters (of the first 7 days of ventilation or of the whole ventilation period, if the patient had been ventilated less than 7 days), SpO2, blood gases, and demographic data were collected from the pediatric intensive care unit database. Results: Sixty-one patients (median age 12 [4.8-36.4] months) were enrolled in the study. The pressure-control ventilation mode was used on 40 patients (65.6%) and the pressure-regulated volume-control mode was used on 21 (34.4%) patients. Twenty-eight patients (45.9%) had hypoxemic respiratory failure and 44 (72.1%) had hypercapnic respiratory failure. The median positive end-expiratory pressure was higher in pressure-control ventilation mode (5.4 [4.2-6.3] cmH2O) than the pressure-regulated volume-control mode (4.05 [3.68-4.41] H2O, P < .001). Pressure-control mode was used more frequently in hypoxemic cases but both modes were used equally in hypercapnic cases. Hypoxic respiratory failure (yes/no), odds ratio: 3.9 (95% CI 1.2-12.3, P = .02), Ph (nadir), odds ratio: 0.004 (95% CI 0.000-0.275, P = .01), and base excess, odds ratio: 0.88 (95% CI 0.79-0.98, P = .02) were associated with intensive care mortality. Conclusions: Although the pressure-control ventilation mode was preferred more frequently in hypoxemic respiratory failure, there was no significant difference between the 2 respiratory modes in terms of length of pediatric intensive care unit stay, MV duration, and mortality. The pressure-regulated volume-control mode seems to be a safer option for physicians who do not have enough experience in using pressurecontrol ventilation mode.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIHTIR, H. S., AKÇAY, N., ŞEVKETOĞLU, E. (2022). Pressure-Regulated Volume Control and Pressure-Control Ventilation Modes in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Failure. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1, 18–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/415305

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kneyber MCJ, de Luca D, Calderini E, et al. Recommendations for mechanical ventilation of critically ill children from the Paediatric Mechanical Ventilation Consensus Conference (PEMVECC). Intensive Care Med. 2017
  2. 43(12):1764-1780. [CrossRef] 2. Duyndam A, Ista E, Houmes RJ, van Driel B, Reiss I, Tibboel D. Invasive ventilation modes in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2011
  3. 15(1):R24. [CrossRef] 3. Branson RD, Chatburn RL. Controversies in the critical care setting. Should adaptive pressure control modes be utilized for virtually all patients receiving mechanical ventilation? Respir Care. 2007
  4. 52(4):478-85. 4. Tekgüç H, Can FK, Şik G, et al. Daily practice of mechanical ventilation and weaning in Turkish PICUs: A Multicenter Prospective Survey. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020
  5. 21(5):e253-e258. [CrossRef] 5. Farias JA, Frutos F, Esteban A, et al. What is the daily practice of mechanical ventilation in pediatric intensive care units? A multicenter study. Intensive Care Med. 2004
  6. 30(5):918-925. [CrossRef] 6. Shahriari A, Sheikh M. Is the pressure control mode for pediatric anesthesia machines really required? Anesthesiol Pain Med. 2016
  7. 6(2):e35350. [CrossRef] 7. Feldman JM. Optimal ventilation of the anesthetized pediatric patient. Anesth Analg. 2015
  8. 120(1):165-175. [CrossRef] 8. Wolfler A, Calderoni E, Ottonello G, et al. Daily practice of mechanical ventilation in Italian pediatric intensive care units: a prospective survey. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011
  9. 12(2):141-146. [CrossRef] 9. Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group. Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: consensus recommendations from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015
  10. 16(5):428-439. [CrossRef] 10. Greenspan JS, Shaffer TH, Fox WW, Spitzer AR. Assisted ventilation: physiologic implications and complications. In: Polin RA, Fox WW, Abman SH, eds. Fetal Neonatal Physiol. Elsevier
  11. Chacko B, Peter JV, Tharyan P, John G, Jeyaseelan L. Pressurecontrolled versus volume-controlled ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015
  12. CD008807. [CrossRef] 12. Orban JC, Walrave Y, Mongardon N, et al. Causes and characteristics of death in intensive care units: A prospective multicenter study. Anesthesiology. 2017
  13. 126(5):882-889. [CrossRef] 13. Sarkar M, Niranjan N, Banyal PK. Mechanisms of hypoxemia. L