SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sinop Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Stem and leaf anatomy and achen structure of Senecio vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris, Senecio lividus L. and Senecio viscosus L.

Senecio vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris, Senecio lividus L., Senecio viscosus L. (Asteraceae) türlerinde gövde ve yaprak anatomisi ile aken yapısı

Hatice Nurhan BÜYÜKKARTAL
Hatice ÇÖLGEÇEN
Ümit BUDAK
Pages
63–76
Publication Date
2018-05-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study aims to identify morphological, anatomical andhistological differences between these species and contribute to the resolution of taxonomic problems of the genus.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Genus Senecio (Asteraceae) is represented by 52 taxa in Flora of Turkey (43 species, 3 subspecies and 6 varietes). 20 of these 52 taxa are endemic to Turkey and the endemism ratio is 40%.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study is comprises the species of Senecio vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris, Senecio lividus L. and Senecio viscosus L. distrubuted in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study aims to identify morphological, anatomical andhistological differences between these species and contribute to the resolution of taxonomic problems of the genus.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Senecio · anatomi · aken

Abstract

Genus Senecio (Asteraceae) is represented by 52 taxa in Flora of Turkey (43 species, 3 subspecies and 6 varietes). 20 of these 52 taxa are endemic to Turkey and the endemism ratio is 40%. This study is comprises the species of Senecio vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris, Senecio lividus L. and Senecio viscosus L. distrubuted in Turkey. Stem and leaf anatomy of the species wereexamined by light microscopy, and achene fruit structure was examined by light and transmission electron microscopy. This study aims to identify morphological, anatomical andhistological differences between these species and contribute to the resolution of taxonomic problems of the genus.

Özet

Senecio cinsi Türkiye Florası’nda 50 takson ile temsil edilmektedir (41 tür, 3 alttür ve 6 varyete). 50 taksonun 20’si Türkiye için endemiktir ve endemizm oranı % 40’dır. Türkiye’de bulunan Senecio cinsine ait Senecio vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris, Senecio lividus L., Senecio viscosus L. türlerinde gövde ve yaprak anatomisi ışık mikroskopisi ile aken meyve yapısı ışık mikroskopisi ve geçirmeli elektron mikroskopisi (TEM) ile incelenip, morfolojik, anatomik ve histolojik farklılıklar ortaya çıkartılarak cinsin taksonomik problemlerinin çözümlenmesine katkıda bulunmak amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKKARTAL, H. N., ÇÖLGEÇEN, H., BUDAK, Ü. (2018). Stem and leaf anatomy and achen structure of Senecio vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris, Senecio lividus L. and Senecio viscosus L.. Sinop Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 63–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/415142

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Erik S, Tarıkahya B, 2004. Türkiye Florası Üzerine Kebigeç, 17: 139-163
  2. Nordenstam B, 2007. The Euro-Med Notulae 3, eds: Greuter, W., Eckhard, R.S., Willdenowia, 37 (1): 139-89
  3. Mabberley DJ, 1997. The plant-book: a portable dictionary of the vascular plants. Cambridge University Press, New York
  4. Hamzaoğlu E, Budak Ü, Aksoy A, 2009. A new taxon of Senecio (Asteraceae) From Karaman (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Botany 33: 285-289
  5. Chater AO, Walters SM, 1976. Senecio L. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA (eds) Flora Europaea vol 4, pp 191-205, Cambridge Univ Press
  6. Feınbrun-Dothan N, 1978. Senecio L. edn: Feinbrun-Dothan N. Flora Palaestina, vol 3 The Israel Academy Sciences and Humanities. Jerusalem pp 354-7
  7. Nordenstam B, 1989. Senecio L. Iranecio B.Nord., Flora Iranica ed: Rechinger, K.H., Compositae VII, vol: 164, Akademische Druck- u. Verlegsanstalt, Graz, Austria, pp: 53-95
  8. Shıshkın BK, 1995. Senecio L. Flora of the U.S.S.R, eds: Shishkin BK, Bobrov EG, vol: 26, Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh & Koeltz Scientific Books, Dehra Dun, pp: 801-908
  9. Boıssıer E, 1875. Flora Orientalis, vol: 3, pp: 83-414
  10. Matthews VA, 1975a. Senecio L., Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, ed: Davis, P.H., vol: 5, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp: 80-97
  11. Matthews VA, 1975b. Notes Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, vol: 33, 434
  12. Kıt Tan, 2000. Senecio L. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, eds: Güner A, Özhatay N, Ekim T, Başer KHC, vol: 11, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp: 156-157
  13. Algan G, 1981. Bitkisel dokular için mikroteknik, Fırat Üniversitesi Yayınları, Bot. No 1, 94 sy
  14. Luft JH, 1961. Improvements in Epoxy resin embedding methods. J. Biophys. Biocha. Cytol. 9: 409
  15. Stempak JG, Ward RT, 1964. An improved staining method for electron microscopy, J. Cell Biol. 22: 697
  16. Sato JE, 1967. A modified method for bad staining of thin sections, Journal of Electron Microscopy, 16: 133
  17. Metcalfe CR, Chalk L, 1979. Anatomy of dicotyledons I. London-Oxford University press London
  18. İnceer H, Aksu Kalmuk N, İmamoğlu KV, Duman Ö, Hayırlıoğlu-Ayaz S, Arslan G, 2016. Micromorphological, anatomical and cytogenetial studies in endemic Crepis macropus Boiss. & Heldr: (Asteraceae) from Turkey, Acta Bot. Croat. 75(2): 173-178
  19. Zarembo EV, Boyko EV, 2008. Carpology of some East Asian Cardueae (Asteraceae). Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid