Journals / Central Bank Review / 2021 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4

Liquidity transformation, collateral assets and counterparties

Pages
119–129
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Riskier and larger institutions are more likely to pre-position collateral in the FLS, but these counterparties do not subsequently draw upon FLS more than others do.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We investigate if the Bank of England's liquidity facilities encourage some counterparties to participate more than others and if the use of some collateral assets is promoted more than others.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Between 2010 and 2016, there was regular usage of two facilities: Indexed Long-Term Repos (ILTR) and the Funding for Lending Scheme (FLS).We show that participation in ILTR is consistent with safe counterparties using the facilities to meet their liquidity needs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Riskier and larger institutions are more likely to pre-position collateral in the FLS, but these counterparties do not subsequently draw upon FLS more than others do.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

We investigate if the Bank of England's liquidity facilities encourage some counterparties to participate more than others and if the use of some collateral assets is promoted more than others. Between 2010 and 2016, there was regular usage of two facilities: Indexed Long-Term Repos (ILTR) and the Funding for Lending Scheme (FLS).We show that participation in ILTR is consistent with safe counterparties using the facilities to meet their liquidity needs. Collateral assets used for FLS are less liquid. Riskier and larger institutions are more likely to pre-position collateral in the FLS, but these counterparties do not subsequently draw upon FLS more than others do.

🔖

Cite This Article

ROURE, C. D., MCLAREN, N. (2021). Liquidity transformation, collateral assets and counterparties. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4, 119–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/415022

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Adams-Prassl, A., Boneva, T., Golin, M., Rauh, C., 2020b. Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: evidence from real time surveys. J. Publ. Econ. 189, 104245. Adams-Prassl, A., Boneva, T., Golin, M., Rauh, C., 2020a. Furloughing. Fiscal Studies 41 (3), 591e622. Aldan, A. €Oztürk S., 2020. Kadın is¸ gücüne katiliminda artıs¸ ın belirleyicileri: kus¸ ak etkisinin ayrıs¸ tırılması. Dogus¸ Üniversitesi Dergisi 21 (2), 141e156. Alon, T., Doepke, M., Olmstead-Rumsey, J., Tertilt, M., 2020. This Time It's Different: the Role of Women's Employment in a Pandemic Recession (No. W27660). National Bureau of Economic Research. Alon, T., Coskun, S., Doepke, M., Koll, D., Tertilt, M., 2021. From Mancession to Shecession: Women's Employment in Regular and Pandemic Recessions (No. W28632). National Bureau of Economic Research. Aran, M.A., Aktakke, N., Kibar, Z.S., Üçkardes¸ ler, E., 2021. How to assess the child poverty and distributional impact of Covid-19 using household budget surveys: an application using Turkish data. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 1e41. Aum, S., Lee, S.Y.T., Shin, Y., 2021. Covid-19 doesn't need lockdowns to destroy jobs: the effect of local outbreaks in Korea. Lab. Econ. 70, 101993.
  2. Brodeur, A., Gray, D.M., Islam, A., Bhuiyan, S., 2021. A literature review of the economics of Covid-19. J. Econ. Surv. 35 (4), 1007e1044. Bui, T.T.M., Button, P., Picciotti, E.G., 2020. Early evidence on the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the recession on older workers. Public Policy & Aging Report 30 (4), 154e159. Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y.,Weber, M., 2020. Labor Markets during the Covid-19 Crisis: A Preliminary View (No. W27017). National Bureau of Economic Research. Cortes, G.M., Forsythe, E.C., 2020. The Heterogeneous Labor Market Impacts of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Upjohn Institute Working. Paper 20-327.
  3. Crossley, T.F., Fisher, P., Low, H., 2021. The heterogeneous and regressive consequences of Covid-19: evidence from high quality panel data. J. Publ. Econ. 193, 104334. Demir Seker, S., Nas-Ozen, S.E., Acar-Erdogan, A., 2020. Jobs at Risk in Turkey: Identifying the Impact of Covid-19, vol. 2004. Social Protection and Jobs Discussion Paper. Duman, A., 2020. Wage Losses and Inequality in Developing Countries: Labor Market and Distributional Consequences of Covid-19 Lockdowns in Turkey, vol. 602. GLO Discussion Paper. Farre, L., Fawaz, Y., Gonzalez, L., Graves, J., 2020. How the Covid-19 Lockdown Affected Gender Inequality in Paid and Unpaid Work in