Journals / Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20

NATO'nun Yeni Ortaklık Politikası Çerçevesinde “Küresel Ortaklar” ile İlişkileri

Relations With “Global Partners” in the Framework of NATO's New Partnership Policy

Pages
0–85
Publication Date
2014-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Clearly, in an age of austerity, and with its new partnership policy, NATO aims to focus more on developing its relations with global partners

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this article is to discuss all aspects of NATO’s approach to global partners, as well as how the Alliance’s new partnership policy can affect relations with these countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article examines the implications of the change in US foreign policy for NATO and it asserts that the impact of the financial crisis on defence budgets of NATO member states and the shifting American strategic focus to the Asia Pacific region will also force NATO to focus on finding new global partners from this region where there is no possibility for Alliance expansion in the short to medium term.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Clearly, in an age of austerity, and with its new partnership policy, NATO aims to focus more on developing its relations with global partners
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:NATO · NATO’nun Ortaklık Politikası

Abstract

The aim of this article is to discuss all aspects of NATO’s approach to global partners, as well as how the Alliance’s new partnership policy can affect relations with these countries. This article examines the implications of the change in US foreign policy for NATO and it asserts that the impact of the financial crisis on defence budgets of NATO member states and the shifting American strategic focus to the Asia Pacific region will also force NATO to focus on finding new global partners from this region where there is no possibility for Alliance expansion in the short to medium term. Clearly, in an age of austerity, and with its new partnership policy, NATO aims to focus more on developing its relations with global partners

Özet

Bu makalenin amacı, NATO’nun küresel ortaklar ile geliştirdiği ilişkileri ve İttifak’ın yeni ortaklık politikasının söz konusu ilişkileri nasıl etkileyeceğini tüm yönleriyle tartışmaktır. Makale ABD dış politikasındaki değişimlerin NATO’nun ortaklık politikasına yönelik yansımalarını ele almaktadır ve NATO’nun yeni ortaklık politikasının dünyanın çeşitli bölgelerinde ve özellikle İttifak’ın kısa vadede genişleme imkânının olmadığı Asya Pasifik Bölgesi’nde yeni küresel ortaklar yaratacağı iddiasındadır. ABD’nin stratejik önceliklerini Asya Pasifik Bölgesi’ne kaydırması, NATO’nun bu bölgeden küresel ortaklar bulmasını sağlayacaktır. Makalede bu süreç Transatlantik ilişkilerin bir ayrışmadan ziyade bir değişim süreci içerisinde olduğunun kanıtı olarak değerlendirilmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

BAĞBAŞLIOĞLU, A. (2014). NATO'nun Yeni Ortaklık Politikası Çerçevesinde “Küresel Ortaklar” ile İlişkileri. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20, 0–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/414954

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Books HOOK, Glen D., Julie Gilson, Christopher W. Hughes and Hugo Dobson, Japan’s International Relations Politics, Economics and Security., Third Ed. Routhledge, Wiltshire, 2012.
  2. KAY, Sean, “Partnerships and Power in American Grand Strategy”, NATO: The Power of the Partnerships, Eds. Hakan Edström, Janne Haaland Matlary ve Magnus Petersson, Palgrave, Hampshire, 2011.
  3. KRAMER, Franklin D., NATO Global Partnerships: Strategic Opportunities and Imperatives in a Globalized World, Atlantic Council, Washington. MOORE, Rebecca R., “Partnership Goes Global: The Role of Nonmember, Non-European Union States in the Evolution of NATO”, NATO in Search of a Vision, eds. Gülnur Aybet and Rebecca Moore. Georgetown University Press, Washington, 2010.
  4. OĞUZLU, Tarık, NATO Ortaklıkları ve Türkiye: Barış İçin Ortaklık, Akdeniz Diyaloğu, İstanbul İşbirliği Girişimi, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul, 2013
  5. SCHREER, Benjamin, “The Evolution of NATO’s Strategy in Afghanistan” Pursuing Streategy: NATO Operations from the Gulf War to Gaddafi, eds. Hakan Edström and Dennis Gyllensporre. Palgrave, Hampshire, 2012. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), SIPRI Yearbook 2012:
  6. Armaments, Disarmaments and International Security, Summary. Solna: SIPRI, 2012.
  7. Papers ASMUS, Ron, “Rethinking NATO Partnerships for the 21st Century”. NATO Review, 2008 http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2008/03/ART4/ EN/index.htm, (Access date: 20.02.2014).
  8. BAĞBAŞLIOĞLU, Arif, “Beyond Afghanistan NATO’s Partnership with Central Asia and South Caucasus: A Tangled Partnership?”, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2014, Vol. 5 No.1 http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1879366513000274, (Access date: 20.02.2014).
  9. BOZGENAU, Cristina (2012). ““Pooling and Sharing” and “Smart Defence” Beyond the Concept”, Paper presented in the International Scientific Conference with the theme Complex and Dynamic Nature of the Security Environment, 22-23 November 2012, Bucharest: Carol I National Defence University, 2012.
  10. DAALDER, Ivo ve James Goldgeier, “Global NATO”, Foreign Affairs, 2006, Vol. 85, No.5. GHECIU, Alexandra, “In Search of Smart Defense in the Euro Atlantic Area”, CIPS Policy Brief, 2012, No 20, http://cips.uottawa. ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/CIPS_PolicyBrief_Gheciu_Sept 2012.pdf, (Access date: 20.02.2014).
  11. GIEGERICH, Bastian, “NATO’s Smart Defence: Who’s Buying?”. Survival, 2012, Vol. 54, No. 3. KAMP, Karl-Heinz, “‘Global Partnership’ A New Conflict Within NATO?”, Analysis and A