Journals / International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 5 S

Adverb formation process in Albanian and Bodo Languages: A comparative study

Pages
1842–1850
Publication Date
2017-10-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As CA provides better understanding of linguistic difference between two languages, this study may be applied to the field of translation and might help the learners of Albanian and Bodo languages.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the Albanian and Bodo languages in regard to the morphological processes in adverb formation and the aim is to reveal the similarities and differences between these languages in regard to the type of the word before formation such as a)noun, b)adjective, c)pronoun, d)number, e)verb, f)adverb and the type of morphological processes in the formation such as a)prefixation, b)suffixation, c)compounding, d)reduplication.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To achieve this, the contrastive analysis (CA) is applied which is composed of three steps as (1) description; (2) juxtaposition; (3) comparison (Krzeszowski 1990: 35).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As CA provides better understanding of linguistic difference between two languages, this study may be applied to the field of translation and might help the learners of Albanian and Bodo languages.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Contrastive study · morphological process · Albanian language

Abstract

This study examines the Albanian and Bodo languages in regard to the morphological processes in adverb formation and the aim is to reveal the similarities and differences between these languages in regard to the type of the word before formation such as a)noun, b)adjective, c)pronoun, d)number, e)verb, f)adverb and the type of morphological processes in the formation such as a)prefixation, b)suffixation, c)compounding, d)reduplication. To achieve this, the contrastive analysis (CA) is applied which is composed of three steps as (1) description; (2) juxtaposition; (3) comparison (Krzeszowski 1990: 35). This contrastive study shows that these languages share lesser degree of similarities and more of differences in regard to both the type of the word in the pre-formation form and the type of the morphological process in the adverb formation process. In regard to the type of the word in the pre-formation as an adverb, it is found that Albanian and Bodo languages have both common points and differences in terms of the noun and adjective category, however they totally differ from each other in terms of numeral, pronoun and verb categories. As for the morphological processes realized in the adverb formation in Albanian and Bodo languages, both languages have prefixation, suffixation and compounding processes. However, Albanian language has also reduplication in the adverb formation while Bodo has not. As CA provides better understanding of linguistic difference between two languages, this study may be applied to the field of translation and might help the learners of Albanian and Bodo languages.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜÇLÜ, R. (2017). Adverb formation process in Albanian and Bodo Languages: A comparative study. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 5 S, 1842–1850. https://ajindex.com/articles/414860

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Adejumo, A., & Osunbade, N. (2014). A Practical Approach to Word Formation Processes in English. International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature, 2(11), 49-58.
  2. Brahma, D. (2016). Adverb formation process of the Bodo language. Language in In-dia, 16(2). Bodo language. (2017). In Encyclopaedia Britannica Online. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Bodo-language
  3. Booij, G. (2012). The grammar of words: an introduction to linguistic morphology (p.77). Oxford University Press.
  4. Camaj, M. (1984). Albanian grammar: with exercises, chrestomathy and glossaries (p. 64). Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. Dash, N. S., Bhattacharyya, P., & Pawar, J. D. (Eds.). (2016). The wordnet in Indian lan-guages (pp. 14). Springer. Frucht, R. C. (Ed.). (2005). Eastern Europe: an introduction to the people, lands, and cul-ture (pp. 718). ABC-CLIO. Genesin, M. and Matzinger, J. (2015).
  5. Albanian. Müller, A. (Ed.). (2015). Word-formation: an international handbook of the languages of Europe. (p. 3134). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. Göksel, A., & Kerslake, C. (2004). Turkish: A comprehensive grammar (pp.43,90). New York: Routledge. Kulla, A. (2010). The Albanian Linguistic Journey from Ancient Illyricum to EU: Lexical Borrowings (pp.6). (Master Thesis). Linköping University Kurani, A., & Muho, A. (2014). A Morphological Comparative Study between Albanian and English Language. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 14. Nuhiu, M. (2014). Morphological contrastive analysis of adverbs in English and Albanian language. European Journal of Research on Education, Special Issue: Contemporary Studies in Education, 98-102. Štekauer, P., Valera, S., & Kőrtvélyessy, L. (2012). Word-formation in the world's lan-guages: a typological survey (P.322). Cambridge University Press.
  6. Xhina, O. (2013). Prefixation in English and Albanian languages. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(8), 253.