Journals / International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Analysis of scientific production on strategic alliances in the period 1980-2018

Pages
396–412
Publication Date
2020-07-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that research on strategic alliances has evolved over the period 1980 and 2018, moving from a stream of research focused on the motivations for forming and structuring strategic alliances in the period 1980-1995, from another stream focused on the learning, performance and failure of strategic alliances in the period 1995 and 2001 to a new stream characterized by the emergence of new terms such as absorptive capacity with a strong emphasis on the management and transfer of knowledge within strategic alliances.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study takes an integrated approach of quantitative and qualitative studies to understand and analyze the scientific research published on strategic alliances between 1980 and 2018 in the Web of Science database and to reveal the evolution of themes in this area.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The qualitative study includes a content analysis of the articles carried out to discover the content of the most cited articles on strategic alliances.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that research on strategic alliances has evolved over the period 1980 and 2018, moving from a stream of research focused on the motivations for forming and structuring strategic alliances in the period 1980-1995, from another stream focused on the learning, performance and failure of strategic alliances in the period 1995 and 2001 to a new stream characterized by the emergence of new terms such as absorptive capacity with a strong emphasis on the management and transfer of knowledge within strategic alliances.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Srategic alliance · citation analysis · co-occurrence analysis

Abstract

This study takes an integrated approach of quantitative and qualitative studies to understand and analyze the scientific research published on strategic alliances between 1980 and 2018 in the Web of Science database and to reveal the evolution of themes in this area. The quantitative study adopts bibliometric techniques based on citation and co-occurrence analyses of keywords. The qualitative study includes a content analysis of the articles carried out to discover the content of the most cited articles on strategic alliances. The results show that research on strategic alliances has evolved over the period 1980 and 2018, moving from a stream of research focused on the motivations for forming and structuring strategic alliances in the period 1980-1995, from another stream focused on the learning, performance and failure of strategic alliances in the period 1995 and 2001 to a new stream characterized by the emergence of new terms such as absorptive capacity with a strong emphasis on the management and transfer of knowledge within strategic alliances.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACHELHİ, H., BERKA, S. (2020). Analysis of scientific production on strategic alliances in the period 1980-2018. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 396–412. https://ajindex.com/articles/414634

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Ahuja, G. (2000). The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of inter-firm linkages. 27. Albig,W. (1952). Berelson, bernard. Content analysis in communication research. The annals of the ame-rican academy of political and social science, 283(1), 197‑198. Anand, B., & Khanna, T. (2000). Do firms learn to create value ? The case of alliances. Strategic mana-gement journal, 21, 295‑315. Archambault, E., & Gagné, E. V. (s. D.). The use of bibliometrics in the social sciences and humanities. Final report, 79. Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. (2000). Don’t go it alone: alliance network composi-tion and startups’ performance in canadian biotechnology. Strategic management journal, 21(3), 267‑294. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 42(1), 1. Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (2016). From translations to problematic net-works: an introduction to co-word analysis: social science information. Cole, F. J., & Nellie B. (1917). The history of comparative anatomy: a statistical analysis of the litera-ture. Science progress (1916-1919), 11(44), 578‑596. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (1998). Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner coopera-tion in alliances. The academy of management review, 23(3), 491. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2000a). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of manage-ment, 26(1), 31‑61. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2000b). Instabilities of strategic alliances: an internal tensions perspective. Organization science, 11(1), 77‑101. Doz, Y. L. (1996). The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: initial conditions or learning processes ? Strategic management journal, 17, 55‑83. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization science, 7(2), 136‑150. Ferreira, M. P., Storopoli, J. E., & Serra, F. R. (2014). Two decades of research on strategic alliances: analysis of citations, co-citations and themes researched. Revista de administração contemporânea, 18(spe), 109‑133. Gomes, E., Barnes, B. R., & Mahmood, T. (2016). A 22 year review of strategic alliance research in the leading management journals. International business review, 25(1), 15‑27. Grant, R. M., & Bade