Journals / International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

The contribution of morphological instruction to morphological awareness and reading: An integrative experiment on Turkish EFL learners

Pages
263–278
Publication Date
2019-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is concluded that morphological treatment benefited morphological awareness and in turn, reading comprehension.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study attempts to investigate the contribution of morphological instruction on awareness of morphology and its effects on reading.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants were 74 freshmen studying at Translation and Interpreting Department and were distributed into experimental and control groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is concluded that morphological treatment benefited morphological awareness and in turn, reading comprehension.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Morphology · morphological awareness · lexical teaching

Abstract

The present study attempts to investigate the contribution of morphological instruction on awareness of morphology and its effects on reading. The participants were 74 freshmen studying at Translation and Interpreting Department and were distributed into experimental and control groups. The results have shown that the experimental group outperformed the control group on all four tasks of morphological awareness including root analysis, derivations and correction of affixes. On the tasks of reading vocabulary experimental group outperformed the control group again, demonstrating positive effects of morphological instruction. It is concluded that morphological treatment benefited morphological awareness and in turn, reading comprehension. The results also demonstrate that submitting an explicit treatment to the EFL learners on morphology helps them improve morphological awareness which is correlated with reading comprehension

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBULUT, F. D. (2019). The contribution of morphological instruction to morphological awareness and reading: An integrative experiment on Turkish EFL learners. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 263–278. https://ajindex.com/articles/414584

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. Akbulut, F. D. (2017). Effects of morphological awareness on second language vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 10-26.
  3. Amirjalili, F., & Jabbari, A. A. (2018). The impact of morphological instruction on morphological awareness and reading comprehension of EFL learners. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1-30.
  4. Angelelli, P., Marinelli, C. V., & Burani, C. (2014). The effect of morphology on spelling and reading accuracy: a study on Italian children. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 1373. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01373 Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 53(10), 1–166.
  5. August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language-minority children and youth. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychol. Rev. 105, 158–173. doi:10.1037/0033- 295X.105.1.158 Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144–179. doi:10.3102/ 0034654309359353 Burani, C., Marcolini, S., De Luca, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2008). Morpheme-based reading aloud: evidence from dyslexic and skilled Italian readers. Cognition 108, 243–262. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.010 Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–154).
  6. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190. doi:10.1023/A:1008131926604 Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 291– 332. doi:10.1080/02702710390227369 Carlisle, J. F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 464–487. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.4.5.
  7. Carlisle, J. F., & Katz, L. (2006). Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading of derived words. Read. Writ. 19, 669–693. d