The Reasons of Prohibition of Some Religious Publications in the Single Party Era

Kamil COŞTU

Journals / darulfunun ilahiyat / 2015 / Sayı: 33

The Reasons of Prohibition of Some Religious Publications in the Single Party Era

Tek Parti Dönemindeki Bazı Dinî Yayınların Yasaklanma Sebepleri

Kamil COŞTU

Journal: darulfunun ilahiyat
Issue: 2015 · Sayı: 33
Pages: 97–122
Publication Date: 2016-04-01
DOI: —

🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.

DergiPark Record ↗

✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight

⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the degrees related to the banned publications were looked at, it is understood that many works were prohibited with a wrong article of the press law.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯

Objective & Hypothesis: Every political understanding prohibited some publications such as newspapers, magazines and books because it perceived them as opposite to its criteria.

📊

Key Findings & Data:Even during the single party years, which were the same as other terms, some religious publications were inhibited from publication by the politicians because of not being suitable for domestic and international political views.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:When the degrees related to the banned publications were looked at, it is understood that many works were prohibited with a wrong article of the press law.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Tek partili dönem · Matbuat Kanunu · kararname

Abstract

Every political understanding prohibited some publications such as newspapers, magazines and books because it perceived them as opposite to its criteria. Even during the single party years, which were the same as other terms, some religious publications were inhibited from publication by the politicians because of not being suitable for domestic and international political views. When the publications distorting religion were banned in the M Kemal Ataturk’s era, both “prayer magazine” and works written by those criticized the single-party mentality were under the same prohibition in the Ismet Inonu’s years. Generally, founding will did not consult with the Leadership of Religious Affairs about the issue banning in decision-making process. When the degrees related to the banned publications were looked at, it is understood that many works were prohibited with a wrong article of the press law.

Özet

Her siyasî anlayış, kendi kriterlerine uygun olmadığını düşündüğü bazı gazete, mecmua ve kitap gibi çeşitli yayınları yasaklamıştır. Tek partili yıllarda da diğer dönemlerde olduğu gibi bazı dinî muhtevalı yayınların basımı, iç ve dış siyasete uygun görülmeyerek engellenmiştir. M. Kemal Atatürk döneminde daha çok dini tahrif edici yayınlar yasaklanırken; İsmet İnönü’lü yıllarda “dua mecmuası” ve tek parti zihniyetini eleştiren kişilerin eserleri de bu tür bir akıbete maruz kalmıştır. Kurucu irade bu kararı alırken çoğu zaman Diyanet İşleri Reisliği’nin konu hakkındaki fikrine başvurmamıştır. Mezkûr dönemde yasaklanan yayınlarla ilgili kararnamelere bakıldığında ise, pek çok eserin Matbuat Kanunu’nun yanlış maddesi ile memnu kılındığı anlaşılmaktadır.

Keywords

Tek partili dönem Matbuat Kanunu kararname yasaklanmış dinî yayınlar Diyanet İşleri Reisliği the Single Party Period the Press Law degree banned religious publications the Leadership of Religious Affairs

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞTU, K. (2016). The Reasons of Prohibition of Some Religious Publications in the Single Party Era. darulfunun ilahiyat, Sayı: 33, 97–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/41453

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

Kaynak, kaynak