Journals / International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research / 2016 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

Performance of strategic alliance management: Coordination-cooperation cycle

Pages
708–721
Publication Date
2016-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For improving the performance and the success of the alliance project, it is necessary that the coordination-cooperation process go through different strategic level of different partners engaged in the alliance project.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Facing environmental changing and those of competition dynamic, new types of organizations have been advanced as a response to new challenges.
📊
Key Findings & Data:That allows achieving objectives of strategic alliance and also partners’ objectives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For improving the performance and the success of the alliance project, it is necessary that the coordination-cooperation process go through different strategic level of different partners engaged in the alliance project.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cooperation · Coordination · Strategic Alliance Governance

Abstract

Facing environmental changing and those of competition dynamic, new types of organizations have been advanced as a response to new challenges. These types of organization based on cooperations between enterprises have been lately developed. The aim of this article is to understand cooperations in order to reduce the risks of their fail. Thus, understanding the governance of alliances can provide critical insights into how such ties can be better managed: we focus on the coordination-cooperation relationship. The first part of this article, we will give a theoretical back ground about cooperation and coordination. A conceptual framework of the coordination/cooperation process is developed. In the second part, we develop our vision high lightens the existence of a process coordination-cooperation which is sequenced and cycled. That allows achieving objectives of strategic alliance and also partners’ objectives. For improving the performance and the success of the alliance project, it is necessary that the coordination-cooperation process go through different strategic level of different partners engaged in the alliance project.

🔖

Cite This Article

Achelhi, H., Truchot, P. (2016). Performance of strategic alliance management: Coordination-cooperation cycle. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 708–721. https://ajindex.com/articles/414523

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Achelhi H., Truchot P., Aoussat A. (2007). Dashbord of emergence of cooperation between companies- Technopôlis case-study. International Conference for the International Association of Management of Technology- Miami. Project A B Objetif Transfer innovation competences Students Entrepreneurship Pilote Origine UE (France) Maghreb (Morocco) Budget,47 million euros,23 million euros 2. Achelhi H. and Truchot (2013) « Cooperation between European and Maghreb universities: case study » 22nd International Conference for the International Association of Management of Technology Anand BN, Khanna T. (2000). « Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances ». Strategic Management Journal, March Special Issue 21: 295–315.
  2. Ahuja, G. (2000). « Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study ». Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 425–455.
  3. Ahuja, G. (2000). « The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages » Strategic Management Journal, 21: 317–343.
  4. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2001). « How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners ». Academy of Management Executive, 15(1): 139–148.
  5. Anderson, D. & Merna, A. (2005). Project management is a capital investment process. Journal of Management in Engineering, 21, 173-178.
  6. Argyris, C. and D. Schoen (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley. Bleeke, J. and Ernst, D. (1991). The way to win in cross-border alliances, Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 127-135.
  7. Buckley, P & casson A, (1988), «A theory of co-operation in a competitive industry: SEMATECH and semiconductor industry», Academy of management Journal, 38, 113-151
  8. Callahan, J., & MacKenzie, S. (1999). « Metrics for strategic alliance control ». R&D Management, 29: 365–377.
  9. Cassar A. (2005) « Coordination and Cooperation in Local, Random and Small World Networks: Experimental Evidence » Coase, R.H. 1937 « the nature of the firm » reprinted in G.J. Stigler and K.E. Goulding (eds.) Consoli A., Tweedale J. and Jain L.,(2007) « The link between agent coordination and cooperation » - Springer Coughlan P., & Coughlan D., (2002). « Action research for operations management ». International Journal of Operations & Production Management,Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 220-240)
  10. Cullen, J. B., Johnson, J. L., & Sakano, T. (2000). « Success through commitment and trust: The soft side of strategic alliance management ». Journa