Journals / International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research / 2016 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Croatian academics’ attitudes on the importance of academic profession competencies

Pages
116–130
Publication Date
2016-01-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Some of these questions are related to discussions on approaches to acquiring new and/or redefining existing competencies of the academic profession and systems of support for acquiring and redefining academic profession’ competencies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Academic profession is faced with changes and challenges in social environment that occur in the global area of higher education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was conducted on a sample of 1130 academics of all academic positions from seven public universities in Croatia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Some of these questions are related to discussions on approaches to acquiring new and/or redefining existing competencies of the academic profession and systems of support for acquiring and redefining academic profession’ competencies.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Academic profession · Academic profession competencies · (Senior) Academics

Abstract

Academic profession is faced with changes and challenges in social environment that occur in the global area of higher education. These challenges call for (re)defining the existing and introducing new competencies for performing everyday academic duties. The research findings presented in this paper, attempt to answer the research question What are the competencies academics need at the start of their senior academic career? The research was conducted on a sample of 1130 academics of all academic positions from seven public universities in Croatia. The online survey examined the attitudes about how important each competency is to successfully perform the role of a senior academic as well as their assessment of the mastery of each competency. The evaluation scale contained 41 items - academic profession competencies. This paper will present the results of the rankings on the scale evaluating the importance of academic profession competencies and corresponding discussion about new research questions that has been opened. Some of these questions are related to discussions on approaches to acquiring new and/or redefining existing competencies of the academic profession and systems of support for acquiring and redefining academic profession’ competencies.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURK, M., LEDİĆ, J. (2016). Croatian academics’ attitudes on the importance of academic profession competencies. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 116–130. https://ajindex.com/articles/414477

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Altbach, P. G. (2000). The Deterioration of the Academic Estate: International Patterns of Academic Work. In Altbach, P. G. (Eds.), The Changing Academic Workplace: Comparative Perspectives, New York: Boston College Center for International Higher Education, 1-24
  2. Altbach, P. G. (2002). Centers and peripheries in the academic profession: The special challenges of developing countries. In Altbach, P. G. (Eds.), The Decline of the Guru: The Academic Profession in Developing and Middle-Income Countries, New York: Boston College Center for International Higher Education and Palgrave Publishers, 1-22
  3. Altbach, P. G., Davis, T. M. (1999). Global Challenge and National Response: Notes for an International Dialogue on Higher Education. In Altbach, B., P., Peterson, Mc., P. (Eds.). Higher Education in the 21st Century: GLOBAL CHALLENGE AND NATIONAL RESPONSE, 3-10, Institute of International Education. Retrieved 20.11.2012. from: http://www.iie.org/en/Research-and-Publications/Publications-and-Reports/IIE-Bookstore/RR29-Higher-Education-in-the-21st-Century-Global-Challenge-and-National-Response
  4. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution. A Report Prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education. Paris: UNESCO Arbo, P., Benneworth, P. S. (2006). Understanding the regional contribution of higher edu¬cation institutions: a literature review. IMHE ‘The Regional Contribution of Higher Edu¬cation’ project report, Paris: OECD. Beards, M., Edwards, M., Sheik, M. (2009). The secret of high productivity in the research lab. What drives research productivity? An understanding of how the world’s most successful laboratories operate reveals some answers. In Zemmel, R., Sheik, M. (Eds.). Invention reinvented, 7-14, Geneve: McKinsey & Company. Retrieved 1.6.2014. from: http://www.mckinsey.com
  5. Benneworth, P. S., Hospers, G. (2007). Urban competitiveness in the knowledge economy: Universities as new planning animateurs’, Progress in Planning, 67, 105-197.
  6. Bess, J. L. (1998). Teaching well: Do you have to be schizophrenic?. The Review of Higher education, 22, 1, 1-15
  7. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsider: priorities of the professoriate. Stanford, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Boyer, E. L. (1996). The Scholarship of Engagement. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 1, 1, 11-20. Brajdić Vuković, M. (2012). Akteri profesionalne socijalizacije mladih istraži