Journals / International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research / 2016 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Modeling student cohesiveness by waving the sociometric test with the picture apperception value test

Pages
33–44
Publication Date
2016-01-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, it is supposed also to increase student satisfaction during project works.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the main problems why students and also other categories of stakeholders within various organizations are not productive and satisfied with their jobs and organizations is because there is a lack of group cohesiveness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since the latter influence directly the performance and job satisfaction, then there are strong reasons to find effective and efficient ways to stimulate social and task cohesion.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, it is supposed also to increase student satisfaction during project works.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Student Cohesiveness · Sociometric Test · Picture Apperception Value Test

Abstract

One of the main problems why students and also other categories of stakeholders within various organizations are not productive and satisfied with their jobs and organizations is because there is a lack of group cohesiveness. Since the latter influence directly the performance and job satisfaction, then there are strong reasons to find effective and efficient ways to stimulate social and task cohesion. The aim of this study is to model student cohesiveness by using simultaneously the Sociometric Test (ST) for group formation and Picture Apperception Value Test (PAVT) for consonance or social cohesion. The study is based on the method of literature review, theory development, and simulation modeling of students’ behavior. Findings of the study shows the way how can be integrated a sociometric test with a psychometric test for a common purpose (i.e. student cohesiveness referring to their values system). During simulation modeling a relevant point to be emphasized is the role of images during PAVT that serve as a substitute mechanism of questions to be answered. They activate emotions through the brain visual cortex and in them are anchored values. Therefore, through the mention procedure it is possible to understand social cohesion of different small groups of students. Regarding originality, value, and practical applications, this framework is novel and is supposed to increase students’ productivity/performance in terms of perception, learning, and task execution. Furthermore, it is supposed also to increase student satisfaction during project works.

🔖

Cite This Article

HYSA, X. (2016). Modeling student cohesiveness by waving the sociometric test with the picture apperception value test. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 33–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/414455

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aristotle. (1998). The Nicomachean ethics. Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics. Aron, A., Fisher, H., Mashek, D.J., Strong, G., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2005). “Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense roman-tic love”. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, pp. 327–337.
  2. Aronson, E., Wilson, T.D., & Akert, R.M. (2010). Social Psychology, 7th Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Ashkanasy, N.M., Ashton-James, C.E. (2007). “Positive Emotion in Organizations: A Multi-level Framework”. In: D. Nelson & C.L. Cooper (Eds.), Positive Organiza-tional Behavior: Accentuating the Positive at Work, pp. 57-73. London: Sage Publications. Barile, S. (2011). Management Sistemico Vitale: Decisioni e scelte in ambito complesso. Avellino: International Printing. Barile, S. (Ed.) (2013). Contributions to Theoretical and Practical Advances in Man-agement: A Viable Systems Approach (VSA). Roma: Aracne. Beal, D., Cohen, R., Burke, M., & McLendon, C. (2003). “Cohesion and Performance in Groups: A Meta-Analytic Clarification of Construct Relations”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (6), pp. 989-1004.
  3. Behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bollen, K. A., Hoyle, R. H. (1990). “Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination”. Social Forces, 69, pp. 479–504.
  4. Carron, A., Brawley, L. (2012). “Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues”. Small Group Research, 43 (6), pp. 726-743.
  5. Carron, A.V. (1982). “Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations”. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4 (2), pp. 123-138.
  6. Chiocchio, F., Essiembre, H. (2009). “Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review of Disparities Between Project Teams, Production Teams, and Service Teams (English)”, Small Group Research, 40 (4), pp. 382-420.
  7. Corbetta, P. (1999). Metodologia e tecniche della ricerca sociale. Bologna: il Mulino. Dion, K.L. (2000). “Group cohesion: From ‘field of forces’ to multidimensional construct”. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, pp. 7–26.
  8. Ehrhart, M.G., Naumann, S.E. (2004). “Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A group norms approach”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, pp. 960–974.
  9. Ericson, R.F. (1969). “Organizational Cybernetics and Human Values”. Program of Policy Studies in Science and Technology, Monograph No. 4. George Washing-ton University. Espejo, R., Reyes, A. (2011). Organizational Systems: Managing Complexity with the Viable Evans, N. J., Jarvis, P. A. (1986). “The Group Attitude Scal