Journals / Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Learning Model and the Development of Micro, Small, Medium Entreprises in Indonesia

Pages
138–147
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The essence of this cultural value is a driving force for common progress which is the philosophy of the development of the people economy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to describe how the learning process is based on the value of “Gotong royong” which occurs in the MSMEs community in order to face the challenges of high competition in the current era of globalization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was conducted in the MSMEs community consisting of 43 members in various business in Malang of Indonesia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The essence of this cultural value is a driving force for common progress which is the philosophy of the development of the people economy.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The purpose of this study is to describe how the learning process is based on the value of “Gotong royong” which occurs in the MSMEs community in order to face the challenges of high competition in the current era of globalization. Gotong royong is a principle of reciprocity. It means that it does not aim to get money or other materials but it is a hope that when needed there are those who help in the community of gotong royong. This study applied a qualitative method using case study approach. This study was conducted in the MSMEs community consisting of 43 members in various business in Malang of Indonesia. The data were gathered through indepth interview, observation and a group discussion. The learning process that occurs between the community members who are members of the community raises the value of gotong royong (mutual cooperation) in accordance with the vision and mission carried out. With this spirit of gotong royong, it can overcome the difficulties together to advance together in the face of globalization. From the learning model produced, it can be used as literature for policy holders such as the cooperative and community service agencies in developing the community based on the cultural perspective of gotong royong that is characteristic of Indonesian. The essence of this cultural value is a driving force for common progress which is the philosophy of the development of the people economy.

🔖

Cite This Article

SURYANTİ, N., Wahjoedi, W., UTOMO, S. H., HARYONO, A. (2021). Learning Model and the Development of Micro, Small, Medium Entreprises in Indonesia. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 138–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/414309

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Agyapong, F. O., Agyapong, A., & Poku, K. (2017). Nexus Between Social Capital and Performance of Micro and Small Firms in an Emerging Economy: The Mediating Role of Innovation. Cogent Business and Management, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.108 0/23311975.2017.1309784 Analia, D., Syaukat, Y., Fauzi, A., & Rustiadi, E. (2020). The Impact of Social Capital on the Performance of Small Micro Enterprises. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 54(1), 81–96. https:// doi.org/10.17576/JEM-2020-5401-6
  2. A nderson, V., & Boocock, G. (20 02). Sma l l Fi r ms a nd Internationalisation. Human Resource Management Journal, 12(3), 5–24.
  3. Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571–582. https:// doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.571.1442 Awazu, Y. (2004).
  4. Informal Network Players, Knowledge Integration, and Competitive Advantage. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(3), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410541042
  5. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. New York City: General Learning Press.
  6. Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64–76. https:// doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900105 Bosch, F. A. J., Baaij, M. G., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). How Knowledge Accumulation Has Changed Strategy Consulting: Strategic Options for Established Strategy Consulting Firms. Strategic Change, 34, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.705
  7. Bowen, J. R. (1986). On the Political Construction of Tradition: Gotong Royong in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Studies, 45(3), 545–561.
  8. Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., & Nobel, R. (1999). Knowledge Transfer in International Acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 439–462
  9. Buchholz, A. S. (2013). Collective Activity as a Traditional Knowledge Behind the Physical Design. Case Of Urban Kampungs in Indonesia. The Journal of Urbanism, 1(26), 1–13.
  10. Byrom, J., Harris, J., & Parker, C. (2000). Training the Independent Retailer: An Audit of Training Needs, Materials and Systems. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(7), 366–374. https:// doi.org/10.1108/03090590010377727 Coetzer, A. (2006). Managers as Learning Facilitators in Small Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Small Business and Enter prise Development, 13(3), 351–362. https://doi. org/10.1108/14626000610680244 Conlon, T. J. (2004). A Review of Informal Learn