Journals / Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation / 2021 / Cilt: 67 - Sayı: 4

Efficacy of peloidotherapy in unilateral plantar fasciitis: A pilot study

Pages
473–481
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: These results indicate that peloidotherapy may be effective in reducing pain and improving functional status and QoL for patients with unilateral PF.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of peloidotherapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with unilateral plantar fasciitis (PF).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: This prospective, observational pilot study included a total of 80 patients (13 males, 67 females; mean age: 47.7±9.9 years; range, 28 to 68 years) with a diagnosis of unilateral PF between April 2018 and October 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: These results indicate that peloidotherapy may be effective in reducing pain and improving functional status and QoL for patients with unilateral PF.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of peloidotherapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with unilateral plantar fasciitis (PF). Patients and methods: This prospective, observational pilot study included a total of 80 patients (13 males, 67 females; mean age: 47.7±9.9 years; range, 28 to 68 years) with a diagnosis of unilateral PF between April 2018 and October 2018. The patients were divided into two equal groups. The study group (n=40) received peloidotherapy (five days per week for two weeks, total of 10 sessions) + Achilles tendon and plantar fascia stretching exercises (self-stretching for two weeks twice per day for 30 sec, 10 repeats) + heel cup treatment. The control group (n=40) received Achilles tendon and plantar fascia stretching exercises + heel cup treatment. The patients were evaluated before and after treatment using the Visual Analog Scale-pain (VAS-pain), Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS), and Heel Tenderness Index (HTI). Results: The study group showed statistically significant improvements for all parameters after treatment compared to baseline (p<0.05). Control group showed statistically significant improvements in the VAS-pain, HTI, and FAOS-QoL subscales after treatment compared to baseline (p<0.05). The study group had a better improvement in the VAS-pain, FAOS-pain, and FAOS-work daily life subscales than the control group (p<0.05). Conclusion: These results indicate that peloidotherapy may be effective in reducing pain and improving functional status and QoL for patients with unilateral PF.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAARSLAN, F., ORDAHAN, B. (2021). Efficacy of peloidotherapy in unilateral plantar fasciitis: A pilot study. Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Cilt: 67 - Sayı: 4, 473–481. https://ajindex.com/articles/414151

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Trojian T, Tucker AK. Plantar fasciitis. Am Fam Physician 2019;99:744-50
  2. Lemont H, Ammirati KM, Usen N. Plantar fasciitis: A degenerative process (fasciosis) without inflammation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003;93:234-7
  3. Goff JD, Crawford R. Diagnosis and treatment of plantar fasciitis. Am Fam Physician 2011;84:676-82
  4. Chen CM, Lee M, Lin CH, Chang CH, Lin CH. Comparative efficacy of corticosteroid injection and non-invasive treatments for plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2018;8:4033
  5. Salvioli S, Guidi M, Marcotulli G. The effectiveness of conservative, non-pharmacological treatment, of plantar heel pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Foot (Edinb) 2017;33:57-67
  6. Ordahan B, Türkoğlu G, Karahan AY, Akkurt HE. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus kinesiology taping in the management of plantar fasciitis: A randomized clinical trial. Arch Rheumatol 2017;32:227-33
  7. Dedes V, Tzirogiannis K, Polikandrioti M, Dede AM, Nikolaidis C, Mitseas A, et al. Radial extra corporeal shockwave therapy versus ultrasound therapy in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Acta Inform Med 2019;27:45-9
  8. Ersen Ö, Koca K, Akpancar S, Seven MM, Akyıldız F, Yıldız Y, et al. A randomized-controlled trial of prolotherapy injections in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil 2017;64:59-65
  9. Fraser JJ, Corbett R, Donner C, Hertel J. Does manual therapy improve pain and function in patients with plantar fasciitis? A systematic review. J Man Manip Ther 2018;26:55-65
  10. Ge W, Leson C, Vukovic C. Dry cupping for plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci 2017;29:859-62
  11. Groven MD. Peat therapeutics and balneotherapy. In: Pizzorno JE, Murray MT, editors. Textbook of natural medicine. Chapter 45. 4th ed. St. Louis: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier; 2013. p. 385-94
  12. Odabasi E, Turan M, Erdem H, Tekbas F. Does mud pack treatment have any chemical effect? A randomized controlled clinical study. J Altern Complement Med 2008;14:559-65
  13. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983;17:45-56
  14. Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 2001;22:788-94
  15. Karatepe AG, Günaydin R, Kaya T, Karlibaş U, Özbek G. Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score. Rheumat