Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5

Comparative analysis of epidemiological and clinical characteristics of appendicitis among children and adults

Pages
526–533
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

RESULTS: No significant differences were found with respect to gender, rates of perforation and negative appendectomy, laboratory findings, and overall outcomes between children and adults.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate whether there are some differences between pediatric and adult patients with appendicitis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 279 pediatric and 275 adult patients with respect to demographics, past medical history, duration of symptoms, laboratory and radiological findings, operation notes, pathological reports, length of hospital stay and post-operative outcomes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:RESULTS: No significant differences were found with respect to gender, rates of perforation and negative appendectomy, laboratory findings, and overall outcomes between children and adults.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate whether there are some differences between pediatric and adult patients with appendicitis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 279 pediatric and 275 adult patients with respect to demographics, past medical history, duration of symptoms, laboratory and radiological findings, operation notes, pathological reports, length of hospital stay and post-operative outcomes. RESULTS: No significant differences were found with respect to gender, rates of perforation and negative appendectomy, laboratory findings, and overall outcomes between children and adults. However, our study suggests that the diagnosis is more difficult in children, the most preferred radiologic diagnostic methods are abdominal ultrasound and plain X-ray in children vs. computed tomography in adults, air-fluid levels and right-sided scoliosis are more commonly detected on X-ray in children, appendiceal perforation is more common at both extreme of ages, the appendix is perforated earlier and length of hospital stay is longer in children, and misdiagnosis at first admission in children and advanced age in adults were the risk factors associated with the complications. CONCLUSION: The present study found some important differences between childhood and adulthood appendicitis. If these differences are considered when evaluating the patients, more desired outcomes can be achieved for both clinicians and patients. Keywords: Abdominal pain; adult; appendicitis; child.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARMAĞAN, H. H., DUMAN, L., CESUR, Ö., KARAIBRAHIMOGLU, A., BİLALOĞLU, E., HATİP, A. Y., SAVAŞ, M. Ç. (2021). Comparative analysis of epidemiological and clinical characteristics of appendicitis among children and adults. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5, 526–533. https://ajindex.com/articles/413958

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Granan LP, Forssblad M, Lind M, Engebretsen L. The Scandinavian ACL registries 2004-2007: Baseline epidemiology. Acta Orthop 2009;80:563–7
  2. Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A. The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975;106:216–31
  3. Hospodar SJ, Miller MD. Controversies in ACL reconstruction: Bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains the gold standard. Sports Med Arthrosc 2009;17:242–6
  4. Biau DJ, Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Schranz P, Nizard R. ACL reconstruction: A meta-analysis of functional scores. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;458:180–7
  5. Tashman S, Collon D, Anderson K, Kolowich P, Anderst W. Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2004;32:975–83
  6. Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T. Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2008;24:137–45
  7. Streich NA, Friedrich K, Gotterbarm T, Schmitt H. Reconstruction of the ACL with a semitendinosus tendon graft: A prospective randomized single blinded comparison of doublebundle versus single-bundle technique in male athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008;16:232–8
  8. Noyes FR, McGinniss GH, Mooar LA. Functional disability in the anterior cruciate insufficient knee syndrome. Review of knee rating systems and projected risk factors in determining treatment. Sports Med 1984;1:278–302
  9. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR, McCloskey JW. Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati knee rating system in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior cruciate ligament- reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med 1999;27:402–16
  10. Li RC, Maffulli N, Hsu YC, Chan KM. Isokinetic strength of the quadriceps and hamstrings and functional ability of anterior cruciate deficient knees in recreational athletes. Br J Sports Med 1996;30:161–4
  11. Sapega AA, Moyer RA, Schneck C, Komalahiranya N. Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Anatomical and biomechanical considerations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:259– 67
  12. Muneta T Sekiya I, Yagishita K, Ogiuchi T, Yamamoto H, Shinomiya K. Two-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using semitendinosus tendon with Endobuttons: Operative technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy 1999;15:618–24
  13. Yasuda K, Kondo