Journals / Journal of Eta Maritime Science / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

The Impact of Uncertainty on National Port Throughput: Evidence From European Countries

Pages
66–73
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, the present results show cross-sectional dependencies in uncertainty and port throughput variables, indicating that collaborative efforts by European nations are needed to avoid the risks associated with economic policy uncertainties due to the integrated structure of the countries

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the effect of economic policy uncertainties on national port throughputs of selected European countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, we used quarterly observations of 21 European countries covering the periods between 2005 Q1 and 2018 Q3.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, the present results show cross-sectional dependencies in uncertainty and port throughput variables, indicating that collaborative efforts by European nations are needed to avoid the risks associated with economic policy uncertainties due to the integrated structure of the countries
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study investigates the effect of economic policy uncertainties on national port throughputs of selected European countries. For this purpose, we used quarterly observations of 21 European countries covering the periods between 2005 Q1 and 2018 Q3. The Granger non- causality test was used for heterogeneous panel data models and we found that economic policy uncertainties have a considerable impact on port throughputs in the selected sample. Causality tests on individual country level have shown that uncertainties in Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Poland, Slovenia, Spain, and the United Kingdom have an influence over their port throughputs. Moreover, the present results show cross-sectional dependencies in uncertainty and port throughput variables, indicating that collaborative efforts by European nations are needed to avoid the risks associated with economic policy uncertainties due to the integrated structure of the countries

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞLAM, B. B., TEPE, R., AÇIK, A. (2021). The Impact of Uncertainty on National Port Throughput: Evidence From European Countries. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 66–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/413816

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. A.J.E. Corres and A.A. Pallis, “Flag state performance: an empirical analysis,” WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, vol. 7, pp. 241-261, April 2008
  2. J.N.K. Mansell, Flag state responsibility: historical development and contemporary Issues. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009
  3. J. Chen, S. Zhang, L. Xu, Z. Wan, Y. Fei and T. Zheng, “Identification of key factors of ship detention under port state control.” Marine Policy, vol. 102, pp. 21-27, April 2019
  4. L. Fan, M. Luo, and J. Yin, “Flag choice and port state control inspections empirical evidence using a simultaneous model”, Journal Transport Policy, vol. 35, pp. 350-357, Sept 2014
  5. M. Perepelkin, S. Knapp, G. Perepelkin, De, and M. Pooter, “An improved methodology to measure flag performance for the shipping industry,” Marine Policy, vol. 34, pp. 395-405, May 2010
  6. H. Ban, and D. Jang, “Recent developments in regional memorandums of understanding on port state control,” Ocean Development and International Law, vol. 243, pp. 170-187, May 2012
  7. P. Cariou, M.Q. Meija Jr and F.C. Wolff, “On the effectiveness of port state control inspections,” Transportation Research Part E, vol. 44, pp. 491-503, May 2008
  8. J. Hare, and J. Ga, “Port State Control: Strong Medicine to Cure a Sick Industry. Journal of International Comparative Law, vol. 26, pp. 571-594, 1996
  9. S. Knapp and P.H. Franses, “Econometric analysis on the effect of port state control inspections on the probability of casualty: can targeting of substandard ships for inspections be improved?,” Marine Policy, vol. 31 pp. 550-563, Jul 2007
  10. C. Heij, G. Bijwaard and S. Knapp, “Ship inspection strategies: effects on maritime safety and environmental protection”. Transportation Research Part D, vol. 16, pp. 42-48, Jan 2011
  11. İ.B. Aydemir, “The Analysis of Defects Determined at The Ships in The Context of Ship Inspection Report Programme (SIRE) (published master thesis).” Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, 2015
  12. M. Bayram, “Analysis of Turkish flagged ships detained at Paris, Mediterranean, and Blacksea memorandums (published master thesis).” Karadeniz Technical University, 2010
  13. Paris MoU Port State Control, “Port State Progression Detention Rate Down,” Paris MoU Port State, St. Petersburg, Russia, Annual Report 2019 January 12, 2020
  14. F. Piniella, E. Rodríguez-Díaz, and J.I. Alcaide, “A Comparative Analysis of vessels detained under the PSC Agreements of Paris, Tokyo and Viña del Mar,