Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5

Effect of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt on transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pages
671–676
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as an effective treatment in HCC.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) usually occurs accompanied by portal hypertension.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS A comprehensive search of studies among PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was conducted, from the earliest publishing date to January 27th, 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as an effective treatment in HCC.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSE Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) usually occurs accompanied by portal hypertension. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as an effective treatment in HCC. Recent studies had conflicting results regarding the effectiveness and safety of TACE for HCC in patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the influence of TIPS on the effectiveness and safety of TACE for patients with HCC. METHODS A comprehensive search of studies among PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was conducted, from the earliest publishing date to January 27th, 2020. Statistical analyses were all performed using the Stata 13.0 software. I2 index statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. RESULTS Six studies with a total of 536 patients with HCC were included in the analysis. The pooled response rate was 51% (95% CI: 25% to 77%) with a significant heterogeneity (I2=93.3%, p < 0.001). The TACE + TIPS group had an inferior response rate than the non-TIPS group, but the difference had no statistical significance (p = 0.171) and heterogeneity was low (I2=0.00%, p = 0.490). Pooled hepatic failure rate was 8.8% (95% CI: 5.2% to 12.4%) with low heterogeneity (I2=0.0%, p = 0.747). But the pooled hepatic failure rate increased to 12.7% (95% CI: 5.7% to 19.7%) with low heterogeneity (I2=11.5%, p = 0.323) if the patients who received TIPS after TACE were excluded. CONCLUSION TIPS does not influence the effectiveness of TACE, but attention should be paid to the risk of hepatic failure.

🔖

Cite This Article

CHEN, X., QİU, Z. K., WANG, G. B., CHEN, X. L., ZHANG, F. J., GAO, F. (2021). Effect of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt on transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5, 671–676. https://ajindex.com/articles/413749

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2018
  2. 1301–1314. [Crossref] 2. Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018
  3. 723–750. [Crossref] 3. Thiele M, Gluud LL, Fialla AD, Dahl EK, Krag A. Large variations in risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality in treatment naïve hepatitis B patients: systematic review with meta-analyses. PloS One 2014
  4. e107177. [Crossref] 4. Rudler M, Poynard T, Thabut D. Early use of TIPS for cirrhosis and variceal bleeding. New Engl J Med 2010
  5. [Crossref] 5. Sankar K, Moore CM. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. JAMA 2017
  6. [Crossref] 6. Riggio O, Ridola L, Angeloni S, et al. Clinical efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt created with covered stents with different diameters: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Hepatol 2010
  7. 267–272. [Crossref] 7. Forner A, Gilabert M, Bruix J, Raoul JL. Treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2014
  8. 525–535. [Crossref] 8. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2012
  9. 1245–1255. [Crossref] 9. Tesdal IK, Wikström M, Flechtenmacher C, Filser T, Dueber C. Percutaneous treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2006
  10. 778–784. [Crossref] 10. Kohi MP, Fidelman N, Naeger DM, LaBerge JM, Gordon RL, Kerlan RK. Hepatotoxicity after transarterial chemoembolization and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: do two rights make a wrong? J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013
  11. 68–73. [Crossref] 11. Kuo YC, Kohi MP, Naeger DM, et al. Efficacy of TACE in TIPS patients: comparison of treatment response to chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with and without a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013
  12. 1336–1343. [Crossref] 12. Qiu B, Zhao MF, Yue ZD, et al. Combined transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and other interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol 2015
  13. 12439–12447. [Crossref] 13. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009
  14. b2535. [Crossref] 14. Lencioni R, Llovet JM. Modified RECI