SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marine Science and Technology Bulletin / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

A Bibliometric Review and Science Mapping Research of Oil Spill Response

Müge BÜBER
Burak KÖSEOĞLU
Pages
123–134
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further research is recommended in light of longer-term data and the diverse Web of Science (WoS) categories found in oil spill science, which may be visualized using a variety of bibliometric visualization applications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to evaluate the research output of oil spill response and citations from 2000 to 2022 through a bibliometric analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The primary findings were as follows: there has been a noticeable increase in the number of publications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further research is recommended in light of longer-term data and the diverse Web of Science (WoS) categories found in oil spill science, which may be visualized using a variety of bibliometric visualization applications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Bibliometric Analysis · Network Mapping · Science Mapping

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the research output of oil spill response and citations from 2000 to 2022 through a bibliometric analysis. The primary findings were as follows: there has been a noticeable increase in the number of publications. The most active journal was Marine Pollution Bulletin. Environmental sciences ranked as the most popular subject area. The United States of America (USA) published the greatest number of single-authored, internationally collaborative, first-authored papers. Oil spill(s) was the most widely queried research term, ranking first in the article title, abstract, and author keyword analysis, respectively. The Deep-Water Horizon disaster, the largest marine oil spill in 2010, was the most frequently analyzed oil spill accident in the research as a sample. This study makes a significant contribution to the field of oil spill response science by being one of the few that applies network visualization and mapping technique. Further research is recommended in light of longer-term data and the diverse Web of Science (WoS) categories found in oil spill science, which may be visualized using a variety of bibliometric visualization applications.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜBER, M., KÖSEOĞLU, B. (2022). A Bibliometric Review and Science Mapping Research of Oil Spill Response. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 123–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/413695

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adebajo, M. O., Frost, R. L., Kloprogge, J. T., Carmody, O., & Kokot, S. (2003). Porous materials for oil spill cleanup: a review of synthesis and absorbing properties. Journal of Porous Materials, 10(3), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027484117065
  2. Alves, T. M., Kokinou, E., Zodiatis, G., Lardner, R., Panagiotakis, C., & Radhakrishnan, H. (2015). Modelling of oil spills in confined maritime basins: The case for early response in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Environmental Pollution, 206, 390-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.07.042
  3. Atlas, R. M., & Hazen, T. C. (2011). Oil biodegradation and bioremediation: A tale of the two worst spills in US history. Environmental Science and Technology, 45(16), 6709–6715. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2013227
  4. Bonvicini, S., Bernardini, G., Scarponi, G. E., Cassina, L., Collina, A., & Cozzani, V. (2022). A methodology for response gap analysis in offshore oil spill emergency management. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 174, 113272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113272
  5. Boopathy, R. (2000). Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Bioresource Technology, 74(1), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00144-3
  6. Bucelli, M., Landucci, G., Haugen, S., Paltrinieri, N., & Cozzani, V. (2018). Assessment of safety barriers for the prevention of cascading events in oil and gas offshore installations operating in harsh environment. Ocean Engineering, 158, 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.02.046
  7. Chang, S. E., Stone, J., Demes, K., & Piscitelli, M. (2014). Consequences of oil spills: a review and framework for informing planning. Ecology and Society, 19(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06406-190226
  8. Chen, D., Liu, Z., Luo, Z., Webber, M., & Chen, J. (2016). Bibliometric and visualized analysis of emergy research. Ecological Engineering, 90, 285-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.026
  9. Chen, J., Di, Z., Shi, J., Shu, Y., Wan, Z., Song, L., & Zhang, W. (2020). Marine oil spill pollution causes and governance: A case study of Sanchi Tanker collision and explosion. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 122978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122978
  10. Chen, J., Zhang, W., Wan, Z., Li, S., Huang, T., & Fei, Y. (2019). Oil spills from global tankers: Status review and future governance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.020
  11. Choi, S. J., Kwon, T. H., Im, H., Moon, D. I., Baek, D. J., Seol, M. -L., Duarte, J. P., & Choi, Y. -K. (2011). A po